Skip to main content

Non-Cooperative Dynamic Games with General Utility Functions

  • Chapter
Stochastic Games And Related Topics

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLC,volume 7))

Abstract

The present paper is concerned with a general non-cooperative two-person dynamic game with Borel state and action spaces, non-Markovian transition law and with utility functions depending on the whole sequence of states and actions. The motivation for a general utility function is that in several problems in economic theory, additivity or separability of the utility function is a restrictive assumption and hard to justify, e.g. in problems of consumption and production choices over time and in the closely related problems of optimal economic growth. Dynamic games with additive utility functions have been introduced by Shapley [22] and have then been investigated by many authors (see the survey paper of Parthasarathy and Stern [16] or Kiienle [9]). In recent years several authors have considered dynamic games with more general utility functions, e.g. Sengupta [21], Iwamoto [7], Schäl [19].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ash, R. B. (1972). “Real Analysis and Probability”. New, York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fan, K. (1952). Fixed-Point and Minimax Theorems in Locally Convex Topological Linear Spaces. Proc. Nat. Akad. Sci., 38, 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Federgruen, A. (1978). On N-Person Stochastic Games with a Denumerable State Space. Adv. Appl. Prob., 10, 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frid, E. B. (1973). On Stochastic Games. Theory Prob. Appl., 18, 389–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glicksburg, I. (1952). A Further Generalization of the Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem with Application to Nash Equilibrium Points. Amer. Math. Soc., 3, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hinderer, K. (1970). “Foundation of Non-Stationary Dynamic Programming with Discrete Time Parameter”. Lecture Notes in Operations Research and Mathematical Systems, 33, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwamoto, S. (1975). Finite Horizon Markov Games with Recursive Payoff Systems. Memoirs of the Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., 29, 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kindler, J. (1975). Spiele mit abzählbarem Baum. Operations Research Verfahren, 21, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Küenle, H.-U. (1986). Stochasticsche Spiele und Entscheidungsmodelle. Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maitra A. and T. Parthasarathy 1970. On Stochastic Games. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 5 289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maitra, A. and T. Parthasarathy (1971) On Stochastic Games II. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 8, 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowak, A. S. (1984). Approximation Theorems for Zero-Sum Non-Stationary Stochastic Games. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 92, 418–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak, A. S. (1984). Noncooperative Non-Stationary Stochastic Sames. OPSEARCH, 21, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nowak, A. S. (1986). Semicontinuous Non-Stationary Stochastic Games. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 117, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parthasarathy, T. (1973). Discounted, Positive and Noncooperative Stochastic Games. Intern. J. Game Theory, 2, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parthasarathy, T. and M. Stern (1977). Markov Games-a Survey. in: E. Roxin, P. Liu and R. Sternberg (eds.) Differential Games and Control Theory, II, New York, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rieder, U. (1978). On Semi-Continuous Dynamic Games. Technical Report, University of Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rieder, U. (1979). Equilibrium Plans for Nonzero-Sum Markov Games. in: O. Moeschlin and D Pallaschke (eds.) Seminar on Game Theory and Related Topics, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schäl, M. (1975). Conditions for Optimality in Dynamic Programming and for the Limit of n-Stage Optimal Policies to Be Optimal. Zeitschrift Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, 32, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schäl, M. (1981). Stochastic Non-Stationary Two-Person Zero-Sum Games. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 61, 352–353.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sengupta, S. K. (1975). Lower Semicontinuous Stochastic Games with Imperfect Information. Ann. Statist., 3, 554–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapley, L.S. (1953). Stochastic Games. Proc. Nat. Acad.Sci., 39, 1095-1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieder, U. (1991). Non-Cooperative Dynamic Games with General Utility Functions. In: Raghavan, T.E.S., Ferguson, T.S., Parthasarathy, T., Vrieze, O.J. (eds) Stochastic Games And Related Topics. Theory and Decision Library, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3760-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3760-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5673-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3760-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics