Skip to main content

Judgments of Incompetence and Their Moral Presuppositions

  • Chapter
Competency

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 39))

Abstract

As I read through Dr. Knight’s paper [3], wondering what useful thing I could possibly say to a person so experienced in the day-to-day decisions concerning competence, given my own near-complete inexperience, it strikes me that this inexperience itself may have some small advantage. At least I can approach the problems afresh, innocent of partisanship toward any of the positions that have already been marked concerning the way to approach the difficult decisions that must be made by physicians and by patients. I will not be a paternalist, nor an advocate of unfettered autonomy for the patient, nor do I have an initial bias toward any of the many positions between. My contribution will be one that philosophers out of their ignorance (celebrated since Socrates) are privileged to make: the raising of questions, but most especially of questions about questions that others are asking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Hart, H. L. A.: 1949, ‘Ascription of Responsibility and Rights’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series (XLIX), 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hodson, J.: 1983, The Ethics of Legal Coercion, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Knight, J. A.: 1991, ‘Judging Competence: When the Psychiatrist Need, and Need Not, Be Involved’ in this volume, pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1982, Making Health Care Decisions, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Âİ 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pincoffs, E.L. (1991). Judgments of Incompetence and Their Moral Presuppositions. In: Cutter, M.A.G., Shelp, E.E. (eds) Competency. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3614-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3614-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5603-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3614-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics