Skip to main content

The Use of Proof Plans for Normalization

  • Chapter
Automated Reasoning

Part of the book series: Automated Reasoning Series ((ARSE,volume 1))

Abstract

We propose using proof plans to implement expression normalizers in automatic theorem proving. We outline some general-purpose proof plans and show how these can be combined in various ways to yield some standard normalizers. We claim that using proof plans facilitates the flexible application of these normalizers so that they can interact with the theorem prover in which they are embedded. We intend to extend this technique to decision procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. S. Boyer and J. S. Moore (1988): Integrating Decision Procedures into Heuristic Theorem Provers: A Case Study of Linear Arithmetic. In: J. E. Hayes, J. Richards, and D. Michie, eds.: Machine Intelligence 11, 83–124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Hodes (1971): Solving Problems by Formula Manipulation. Proceedings of the Second IJCAI, The British Computer Society, 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bundy (1988): The Use of Explicit Plans to Guide inductive Proofs. Proceedings of CADE-9, R. Lusk and R. Overbeek, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 310, Springer-Verlag, 111–120. Longer version available from Edinburgh as Research Paper No. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, J. Hesketh, and A. Smaill (in press): Experiments with Proof Plans for Induction. Journal of Automated Reasoning Earlier version available from Edinburgh as Research Paper No. 413.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.V. Desimone (1989): Learning Control Knowledge within an Explanation-Based Learning Framework. Ph. D. thesis, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Sterling, A. Bundy, L. Byrd, R. O’Keefe, and B. Silver (1989): Solving Symbolic Equations with PRESS. J. Symbolic Computation 7,71–84. Also available from Edinburgh as Research Paper No. 171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bundy, A. (1991). The Use of Proof Plans for Normalization. In: Boyer, R.S. (eds) Automated Reasoning. Automated Reasoning Series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3488-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3488-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5542-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3488-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics