Skip to main content

Habitat structure and predator—prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems

  • Chapter
Habitat Structure

Part of the book series: Population and Community Biology Series ((PCBS,volume 8))

Abstract

Many common features of aquatic habitats provide complexity in an otherwise unstructured water column. Abiotic elements include consolidated and unconsolidated sediments as well as many types of rock, whereas biotic elements include woody debris, coral and oyster reef formations and emergent and submersed vegetation. Special attention has been focused on submersed vegetation and its role in the functioning of aquatic systems, because of its very frequent occurrence in both freshwater (ponds and streams) and coastal marine ecosystems (estuaries and lagoons) and, more importantly, because animal abundances in vegetated habitats are frequently several orders of magnitude greater than in nearby unvegetated areas (cf. Rosine, 1955; Gerking, 1957; Harrod, 1964 for freshwater sites; Tabb et al., 1962, Thayer et al., 1975; Livingston, 1975 for marine sites). In fact, over 70 years ago Victor Shelford (1918) recognized the importance of plant surface as a factor governing the species composition of the freshwater fauna (cited in Rosine, 1955). At about the same time, Peterson (1918) described the richness of the fauna associated with European seagrass meadows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, J. D. and Hasler, A. D. (1943) Fluctuations in the animal population of the littoral zone in Lake Mendota. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci., 35, 175–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. V. and Streams, E. A. (1986) Effects of vegetation on Notonecta (Hemiptera) distribution in ponds with and without fish. Oikos, 46, 62–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundon, J. A. and Kennedy, V. S. (1982) Refuges for infaunal bivalves from blue crab Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun) predation in Chesapeake Bay. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 65, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronmark, C. (1985) Interactions between macrophytes, epiphytes and herbivores: an experimental approach. Oikos, 45, 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R. (ed.) (1986) Complex Interactions in Lake Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F. and Hodgson, J. H. (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience, 35, 634–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R. and Lodge, D. M. (1986) Effect of submerged macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot., 26, 341–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, A. (1983) Grazing on epiphytes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 28, 124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, L. C, Heck, K. L. Jr and Abele, L. G. (1981) Experiments on competition and predation among shrimp of seagrass meadows. Ecology, 62, 1484–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. E. and Streams, F. A. (1984) Fish predation on Notonecta: relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecologia, 64, 177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E. and Crowder, L. E. (1979) Patterns of predation in simple and complex environments. In Predator Prey Systems in Fisheries Management (eds R. H. Shoud and H. Clopper), Sport Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C. and Wells, J. M. J. (1983) Refuges from fish predation: experiments with phytal meiofauna from the New Zealand rocky intertidal. Ecology, 64, 1599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. B. and Cooper, W. E. (1979) The effects of macrophyte removal on the feeding efficiency and growth of sunfishes: evidence from pond studies. In Aquatic Plants Lake Management and Ecosystem Consequences of Lake Harvesting (eds J. E. Breck, R. T. Prentki and O. L. Loucks), University of Wisconsin Institute for Earth Studies, Madison, Wis., pp. 251–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. B. and Cooper, W. E. (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology, 63, 1802–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. B., Drenner, R. W., Kerfoot, W. C, McQuee, D. J., Mills, E. L., Sommer, U., Spencer, C. M., Spencer, M. and Vanni, M. J. (1988) Food web interactions in lakes. In Complex Interactions in Lake Communities (ed. S. R. Carpenter), Springer-Verlag, London, Berlin, New York, pp. 141–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H. E. and Connell, J. H. (1987) Marine invertebrates in an algal succession. III. Mechanisms linking habitat complexity with diversity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 109, 249–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R. W. and Goldman, C. R. (1975) The effects of a benthic grazer on the primary productivity on the littoral zone of Lake Tahoe. Limnol. Oceanogr., 20, 935–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerking, S. D. (1957) A method of sampling the littoral macrofauna and its application. Ecology, 38, 219–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, M. R. (1971) Computer analysis of predation energetics in largemouth bass. In Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology (ed. B. C. Patton), Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 325–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J. J. (1964) The distribution of invertebrates on submerged aquatic plants with chalk stream. J. Anim. Ecol., 335–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K. L. and Orth, R. J. (1980) Seagrass habitats: the roles of habitat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroin-vertebrate assemblages. In Estuarine Perspectives (ed. V. S. Kennedy), Academic Press, New York, pp. 449–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K. L. and Thoman, T. A. (1981) Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic environments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 53, 125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K. L. and Wilson, K. A. (1987) Predation rates on decapod crustaceans in latitudinally separated seagrass communities: a study of spatial and temporal variation using tethering techniques. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 107, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. K. and Short, F. T. (1986) Seagrass growth and survivorship under the influence of epiphyte grazers. Aquat. Bot., 24, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huden, C. (1983) Selection of unicellular algae by the littoral amphipods Gammarus oceanicus and Calliopius laeviusculea (Crustacea). Mar. Biol., 78, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R. D. and Russell-Hunter, W. D. (1983) Bioenergetic and community changes in intertidal Aufwuchs grazed by Littorina littorea. Ecology, 64, 761–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, P. L. (1989) The effects of habitat complexity and light intensity on ambush predation within a simulated seagrass habitat. MS thesis, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S. C. (1989) The growth responses of eelgrass, Zostera marina to epiphyte fouling and herbivore grazing in a New England estuary. M Sc thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W. C. and Sih, A. (1987) Predation: Direct and Indirect Effects on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, D. H. (1981) Periphyton grazing by Amnicola limosa: An enclosure-exclosure experiment. J. Freshw. Ecol., 1, 51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiorboe, T. (1980) Distribution and production of submerged macrophytes in Tipper Grund (Rinkbing Fjord, Denmark), and the impact of waterfowl grazing. J.Appl. Ecol., 17, 675–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krecker, F. H. (1939) A comparative study of the invertebrate populations of certain submerged aquatic plants. Ecology, 20, 553–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywosz, T., Krzywosz, W. and Radziej, J. (1980) The effect of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella on aquatic vegetation and ichthyofauna of Lake Dgal Wielki. Ekol. Pol., 28, 435–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leber, K. M. (1985) The influence of predatory decapods, refuge, and microhabitat selection on seagrass communities. Ecology, 66, 1951–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. J. (1975) Impact of kraft pulp-mill effluents on estuarine and coastal fishes in Apalachee Bay, Florida, USA. Mar. Biol., 32, 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M. (1986) Selective grazing on periphyton: a determinant of freshwater gastropod microdistributions. Freshw. Biol., 16, 831–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M. and Lorman, J. G. (1987) Reductions in submersed macrophyte biomass and species richness by the crayfish Orconecterusticus. Can. J. Fish. Aq. Sci., 44, 591–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K. L. (1985) The influence of prey identity and size on selection of prey by two marine fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 98, 145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K. L. (1987) Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows: prey behavior microhabitat selection and cryptic coloration. Ecology, 68, 170–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. H., Crowder, L. B., Dumas, C. and Burkholder, J. M. Predator mediated interactions between grazers, periphyton and macrophytes. Science (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. T. and Hunter, J. R. (1970) Fishes associated with drifting kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off the coast of southern California and northern Baja California. Calif. Fish Game, 56, 288–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G. G. (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optional diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology, 62, 1370–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G. G. (1986) Predator-mediated habitat use: some consequences for species interactions. Environ. Biol. Fish., 16, 159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G. G. (1988) Competition among refuging sunfishes and the effects of fish density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology, 69, 614–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D. H. (1980) Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 383 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. G. (1979) Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 38, 225–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotri, M. E. (1977) Grazing effects of four marine intertidal herbivores on the microflora. Ecology, 58, 1020–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J., Heck, K. L. Jr and van Montfrans, J. (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator prey relationships. Estuaries, 7, 339–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T. (1980) Food webs, linkage interaction strength, and community infrastructure. J. Anim. Ecol., 49, 667–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. G. J. (1918) The sea bottom and its production offish food. A survey of the work done in connection with valuation of the Danish waters from 1883–1917. Kept. Danish Biol. Sta., 25, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H. (1982) Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): Experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density and seagrass cover. Mar. Biol., 66, 159–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prejs, A. (1984) Herbivory by temperate freshwater fishes and its consequences. Environ. Biol. Fish., 10, 281–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. H. and Breen, C. M. (1983) An investigation of macrophyte, epiphyte and grazer interactions. In Periphyton of Freshwater Ecosystems (ed. R. G. Wetzel), Dr W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 217–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosine, W. N. (1955) The distribution of invertebrates on submerged aquatic plant surfaces in Muskee Lake, Colorado. Ecology, 36, 308–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. R. (1987) Role of habitat complexity in mediating predation by the grey damselish, Abudefduf sordidus on epiphytal amphipods. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 36, 101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryer, C. H. (1987) Studies on the foraging ecology of pipefish: prey selection and habitat complexity. Dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryer, C. H. (1988) Pipefish foraging and the effect of altered habitat complexity. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 48, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J. and Stein, R. A. (1982) Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and blue gills as influenced by simulated, submerged vegetation. Trans. Am. Fish Soc., 111, 255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shacklock, P. F. and Croft, G. B. (1981) Effect of grazers on Chondrus crispus in culture. Aquaculture, 22, 331–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shacklock, P. E. and Doyle, R. W. (1983) Control of epiphytes in seaweed cultures using grazers. Aquaculture, 31, 141–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelford, V. E. (1918) Conditions of coexistence. In Freshwater Biology (eds H. B. Ward and G. C. Whipple), Wiley, NY, pp. 21–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A. W. (1980) Abundance, reproductive seasonality and habitat preferences of amphipod crustaceans in seagrass meadows of Apalachee Bay, Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci., 23, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A. W. (1982) The influence of benthic macrophytes on the foraging behavior of pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 8, 271–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabb, I. D., Dubrow, C. D. and Manning, R. (1962) The ecology of northern Florida Bay and adjacent estuary. Tech. Ser. Fla St. Bd Conserv., 39, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G. W., Wolfe, D. A. and Williams, R. B. (1975) The impact of man on seagrass systems. Am. Sci., 63, 288–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Montfrans, J., Orth, R. J. and Vay, S. A. (1982) Preliminary studies of grazing by Bittium varium on eelgrass periphyton. Aquat. Bot., 14, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, S., Valiela, I., Backus, N. and Teal, J. M. (1976) Predation by the saltmarsh killifish Fundulus heteroclitus in relation to prey size and habitat structure: consequences for prey distribution and abundance. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 23, 255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welborn, G. A. and Robinson, J. V. (1987) Macrohabitat selection as an anti-predator strategy in the aquatic insect Pachydiplax longipennis Burmeister (Odonata: Libellulidae). Oecologia, 77, 185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., Gilliam, J. F., Hall, D. J. and Mittelbach, G. O. (1985) An experimental test of the effects of predator risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology, 64, 1540–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. J., Gorden, R. W., Waite, S. W. and Powless, T. (1985) The relationship between aquatic macrophytes and sport fish production in Illinois ponds: a simple model. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgt, 3, 111–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heck, K.L., Crowder, L.B. (1991). Habitat structure and predator—prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In: Bell, S.S., McCoy, E.D., Mushinsky, H.R. (eds) Habitat Structure. Population and Community Biology Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5363-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3076-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics