Abstract
The definition of the commodity is a central issue in modeling people’s choices in the presence of uncertainty. To appreciate why, we need to consider the modeling strategy inherent in virtually all microeconomic descriptions of people’s values for commodities. Using tradeoffs to infer values is usually the first idea introduced in describing individual behavior with microeconomics. A commodity’s value is measured by how much of some other good a person will give up to get more of the defined commodity. This concept is, of course, the essence of a marginal rate of substitution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1974. “Optimal Insurance and Generalized Deductibles,” Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 1, 1–42.
Barrow, B., G. Cain, and A. S. Goldberger. 1981. “Issues in the Analysis of Selectivity Bias.” In E. Stromsdorfer and G. Parkas (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 5. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Bishop, Richard C. 1982. “Option Value: An Exposition and Extension,” Land Economics 58 (February): 1–15.
Camerer, Colin F., 1987. “Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence,” American Economic Review 77 (December): 981–987.
Cook, Philip J., and Daniel A. Graham. 1977. “The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of an Irreplaceable Commodity,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 9 (February): 143–156.
Desvousges, William H., V. Kerry Smith, and Hillery Rink. 1989. Communicating Radon Risk Effectively: Radon Testing in Maryland. Final Report for EPA Cooperative Agreement No. CR-811075, Document No. EPA-230-03-89048 Washington, D.C.: Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March.
Dittman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Erikson, Kai. 1990. “Toxic Reckoning: Business Faces a New Kind of Fear,” Harvard Business Review (January/February): 118–126.
Fischhoff, Baruch. 1989. “Risk: A Guide to Controversy,” Appendix C in Improving Risk Communication. Report by Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Freeman, A. Myrick, III. 1985. “Supply Uncertainty, Option Price, and Option Value,” Land Economics 61 (August): 176–181.
Freeman, A. Myrick, III. 1989. “Ex Ante and Ex Post Values for Changes in Risks,” Risk Analysis 9(3): 309–317.
Freeman, A. Myrick, III. 1991. “Valuing Individuals’ Changes in Risk: A General Treatment,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4 (April): 153–166.
Golding, Dominic, Sheldon Krimsky, and Alonzo Plough. 1990. Radon Risk Communication in Context: An Experiment in Massachusetts, Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Center for Environmental Management. Boston: Tufts University, January 30.
Graham, Daniel A. 1981. “Cost Benefit, Analysis Under Uncertainty,” American Economic Review 71 (December): 715–725.
Grether, David M. 1980. “Bayes Rules as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 95 (November): 537–558.
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample, Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica 47 (January): 153–161.
Ippolito, Pauline M. 1981. “Information and the Life Cycle Consumption of Hazardous Goods,” Economic Inquiry 19 (October): 529–558.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk,” Econometrica 47(1): 263–291.
Machina, Mark J. 1990. “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” In R. Brett Hammon and Rob Coppock (eds.), Valuing Health Risks, Costs and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Magat, Wesley A., W. Kip Viscusi, and Joel Huber. 1988. “Consumer Processing of Hazard Warning Information,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (June): 201–223.
McClelland, Gary H., William D. Schulze, and Don L. Coursey. 1986. “Valuing Risk: A Comparison of Expected Utility with Models from Cognitive Psychology,” University of Colorado, unpublished paper, September.
National Research Council. 1988. Health Risks of Radon and Other Internally Deposited Alpha-Emitters. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Plummer, Mark L., and Richard C. Hartman. 1986. “Option Value: A General Approach,” Economic Inquiry 24 (July): 455–472.
Slovic, Paul. 1987. “Perception of Risk,” Science 236 (April): 280–285.
Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sarah Lichtenstein. 1985. “Regulation of Risk: A Psychological Perspective.” In R. Noll (ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Smith, V. Kerry. 1983. “Option Value: A Conceptual Overview,” Southern Economic Journal 49 (January): 654–668.
Smith, V. Kerry. 1985. “Supply Uncertainty, Option Price and Indirect Benefit Estimation,” Land Economics 61 (August): 303–307.
Smith, V. Kerry. 1990. “Valuing Amenity Resources Under Uncertainty: A Skeptical View of Recent Resolutions,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19 (September): 193–202.
Smith V. Kerry, and William H. Desvousges. 1990. “Risk Communication and the Value of Information: Radon as a Case Study,” Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (February): 137–142.
Smith, V. Kerry, and F. Reed Johnson. 1988. “How Do Risk Perceptions Respond to Information? The Case of Radon,” Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (May): 1–8.
Smith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, John W. Payne. 1991. “Does Risk Information Influence Mitigation Behavior?” Working Paper, Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University.
Smith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, Ann Fisher, and F. Reed Johnson. 1988. “Learning About Radon’s Risk,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (June): 233–258.
Smith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, Ann Fisher, and F. Reed Johnson. Communicating Radon Risk Effectively: A Mid-Course Evaluation. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Vanderbilt University. 1987.
Smith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, F. Reed Johnson, and Ann Fisher. 1990. “Can Public Information Programs Affect Risk Perceptions?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9 (Winter): 41–59.
Thaler, Richard, and Sherwin Rosen. 1976. “The Value of Saving a Life: Evidence from the Labor Market,” In Nestor E. Terleckyi (ed.), Household Production and Consumption. New York: Columbia University Press.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: EPA.
Viscusi, W. Kip. 1989. “Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 (September): 235–264.
Viscusi, W. Kip. 1990. “Sources of Inconsistency in Societal Responses to Health Risks.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80 (May): 257–261.
Viscusi, W. Kip, and Charles J. O’Connor. 1984. “Adaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers? American Economic Review 74 (December): 942–956.
Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber. 1986. “Informational Regulation of Consumer Health Risks: An Empirical Evaluation of Hazard Warnings,” Rand Journal of Economics 17 (Autumn): 351–365.
Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber, 1987. “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,” Rand Journal of Economics 18 (Winter): 465–479.
Weinstein, Neil D., Peter Sandman, and Nancy E. Roberts. 1989. Communicating Effectively About Risk Magnitudes. Final Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-230-08-89-064.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, V.K. (1992). Environmental Risk Perception and Valuation: Conventional Versus Prospective Reference Theory. In: Bromley, D.W., Segerson, K. (eds) The Social Response to Environmental Risk. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2954-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2954-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5311-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2954-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive