Skip to main content

The Robust Design in Capture-Recapture Studies: A Review and Evaluation by Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Chapter
Wildlife 2001: Populations

Abstract

The use of capture-recapture methods in the estimation of population size, survival rates, and recruitment rates of wild animals is well established. The traditional approach has been to use the closed population models summarized by Otis et al. (1978) for short-term studies, and the Jolly-Seber open population model (Jolly 1965, Seber 1965), or some variation of it, for long-term studies. Pollock (1982) proposed a “robust” design that would allow the use of both closed and open population models in an ad hoc fashion for long-term studies. Potential advantages of this ad hoc method, over the use of the Jolly-Seber model alone, include: (1) abundance and other quantities can be estimated without assuming equal catchability, (2) all parameters can be estimated, (3) alternative estimators are available for most parameters, (4) recruitment can be separated into immigration and ’births’ with only two age-classes, (5) abundance and survival can be estimated with minimal sampling correlation, and (6) the design can be customized more finely to meet specific needs. This paper reviews the design and various methods of parameter estimation it allows for, and briefly compares the performance of available estimators using Monte Carlo simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Carothers, A. D. 1973. The effects of unequal catchability on Jolly-Seber estimates. Biometrics 29: 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. 1972. The logic of capture-recapture estimates. Biometrics 28: 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. O. 1973. Approximations of the bias in the Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model. Biometrics 29: 501–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, J. G., M. A. O’Connell, G. D. Sanders, and J. Seidensticker. 1991. Comparison of population estimators for medium-sized mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration — stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. L. 1992. The robust design in capture-recapture studies: modelling approaches and estimation methods. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, L. W., D. S. Otis, and N. R. Holler. 1982. Comparison of open and closed models for cotton rat population estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massot, M., J. Clobert, T. Pilorge, J. Lecomte, and R. Barbault. Density dependence in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara):demographic consequences of a density manipulation. Submitted to Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkins, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson. 1988. Estimation of small mammal population size. Ecology 69: 1952–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, and K. H. Pollock. 1984a. Effects of permanent trap response in capture probability on Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., and K. H. Pollock. 1990. Separate estimation of recruitment from immigration versus in situ reproduction using Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 71: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., K. H. Pollock, and J. E. Hines. 1984B. The use of a robust capture-recapture design in small mammal population studies: a field example with Microtus pennsylvanicus. Acta Theriologica 29: 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., J. R. Sauer, K. H. Pollock, and J. B. Hestbeck. 1992. Estimating transition probabilities for stage-based population matrices using capture-recapture data. Ecology 73: 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference for capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H. 1981. Capture-recapture models allowing for age-dependent survival and capture rates. Biometrics 37: 521–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H. 1982. A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 757–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., J. D. Nichols, C. Brownie, and J. E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexstad, E., and K. P. Burnham. 1991. User’s guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. 1965. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52: 249–259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S. L. 1984. The Jolly-Seber method applied to age-stratified populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 43: 1053–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C., D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, and D. L. Otis. 1982. Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kendall, W.L., Pollock, K.H. (1992). The Robust Design in Capture-Recapture Studies: A Review and Evaluation by Monte Carlo Simulation. In: McCullough, D.R., Barrett, R.H. (eds) Wildlife 2001: Populations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-876-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2868-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics