Skip to main content

The Genesis of Clausal Structure

  • Chapter
The Acquisition of Verb Placement

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 16))

Abstract

Not too long ago the consensus in the field was that during the early stages of language development young children did not have grammatical categories or relations of any sort. but rather that their grammars had a semantic basis (cf. Bowerman, 1973; Schlesinger, 1971, for example). A notable problem for such analyses was to account for the transition to an adult-like, syntactically-based system. Current theories which propose that functional categories are lacking or underspecified in early grammars, face a similar challenge. The latter hypothesis, which I will henceforth refer to as the small clause hypothesis, following Radford (1986, 1990), may in fact have a harder task in that the kinds of semantic bootstrapping mechanisms which have been posited for the acquisition of lexical categories, such as Noun and Verb (cf. Wexler and Culicover, 1980; Grimshaw, 1981), do not readily extend to functional categories, such as INFL or COMP, which have no clear referential function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antinucci, F. and R. Miller: 1976, ‘How children talk about what happened’, Journal of Child Language 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E.: 1976, Language and Context, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, V.: 1967, ‘The acquisition of negation’, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, H.: 1983, ‘On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules’, in W. Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. and K. Wexler: 1988, ‘The maturation of grammatical principles’, ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M.: 1973, Early Syntactic Development, Cambridge Vniversity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.: 1973, A First Language: The Early Stages, Harvard Vniversity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R.: 1991, ‘Tense and agreement in different tenses’, ms., University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1989, ’some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chyi, C.: 1991, ‘A note on morphological overgeneralization’, ms., VCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H.: 1986, ‘Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode’, Linguistics 24,79–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H.: 1990, ‘Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis on some acquisition stages in German child language’, Language Acquisition 1, 361–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J.: 1978, ‘The verbal complex V-V in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9,151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: 1981, ‘Form, function, and the language acquisition device’, in C. Baker and J. McCarthy (eds.), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1988, ‘Functional categories and language acquisition’, paper presented at the 13th Boston University Conference on Language Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, G.: 1986, ‘A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch’, paper presented at the Workshop Uni versals in Child Language, Heidelberg University, February 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N.: 1983, ‘Acquisition of parameterized grammars’, Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N.: 1986a, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N.: 1986b, ‘Core and peripheral grammar and the acquisition of inflection’, paper presented at the 11th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N. (in prep.) ‘C projections in child language’, ms., UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams: 1988, ‘Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter’, Proceedings of NELS 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams: 1990, ‘On the interdependence of syntactic and morphological properties: Aspectual come and go’, to appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.: 1990, ‘On the syntax of inflectional paradigms’, ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1989, ‘Null subjects and clitic climbing’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Y.: 1986, ’subjects in Japanese and English’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S.: 1982, ’syntactic theory and the developing grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. and U. Bellugi: 1966, ’syntactic regularities in the speech of children’, in J. Lyons and R. J. Wales (eds.), Psycholinguistics Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1988, ’subjects’, ms, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J.: 1975, ‘Dutch as an SOV language’, Linguistic Analysis 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.: 1988, ‘Language acquisition and the form of grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.: 1989, ‘Parameter-setting, the acquisition sequence, and the form of the grammar: the composition of phrase structure’, paper presented at GLOW, Utrecht 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limber, J.: 1973, ‘The genesis of complex sentences’, in T. Moore (ed.)., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, B. and C. Platzack: 1988, ‘The acquisition of verb inflection, verb second and subordinate clauses in Swedish’, Working Papers on Scandinavian Syntax 42, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, C. and M. Emiliani: 1990, ’some Italian two year olds. Morphosyntactic competence and why it matters’, ms., University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B.: 1974, ‘How Hungarian children learn to speak’, Ph.D. dissertation, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. M.: 1990. ‘INFL-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement’. J.M. Meisel (ed.). Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, A.: 1989. ‘On the emergence of syntax: A crosslinguistic study’. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzuto, E. and M. C. Caselli: 1991. ‘The acquisition of Italian morphology in a crosslinguistic perspective: Implications for models of language development’. paper presented at the Workshop on Crosslinguistic and Crosspopulations Contributions to the Theory of Acquisition, Hebrew University. Jerusalem, Israel, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C.: 1990. ‘A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish child language’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 13. 107–126. also published in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C. and A. Holmberg: 1989. ‘The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages’, Scandinavian Working Papers in Linguistics 43.51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y.: 1989. ‘Verb movement. Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1986. ’small children’s small clauses’. Bangor Research papers in Linguistics 1. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1990, Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavendra and L. Leonard: 1989, ‘The acquisition of agglutinating languages: Emerging evidence from Tamil’. Journal of Child Language 16, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts: 1990. ‘Complex inversion in French’, Probus 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rögnvaldsson, E.: 1984. ‘Icelandic word order and ad-insertion’. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, J.: 1990. ‘The syntax of the subject in child language’. M.A. thesis, State University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I.: 1971, ‘Production of utterances and language acquisition’, in D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir, S.: 1986. Spurnarsetningar i mali tveggja islenskra barna, M.A. thesis. Univerisity of Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir, S.: 1987. ‘The development of subject-verb inversion phenomenon in the early grammars of Icelandic German and English speaking Children’, ms., University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D.: 1982. ‘Universal and particular in the acquisition of language’, in E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The Stale of the Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, H.: 1986, ‘VI, V2 and V3 in Icelandic’. in H. Haider and M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L.: 1984. ‘Parameters and effects of word order variation’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V.: 1990, ’syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children’. ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A.: 1990. ‘Markedness versus maturation: The case of SAI’. Language Acquisition 1. 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenborn, J., M. Verrips, and R. Berman: 1989. ‘Negation as a window to the structure of early child language’. ms, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. and K. Witkowska-Stadnick: 1985. ‘Basic relations in child language and the word order myth’. ms., SUNY/Fredonia and Adam Mickiewicz University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weverink, M.: 1989, ‘The subject in relation to inflection in child language’, M.A. thesis, University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K.: 1991, ‘Optional infinitives, head movement, and tbe economy of derivations in child grammar’, presented at tbe University of Maryland Conference on Verb Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. and P. Culicover: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyams, N. (1992). The Genesis of Clausal Structure. In: Meisel, J.M. (eds) The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5245-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2803-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics