Skip to main content

Hierarchical Generate-and-Test vs Constraint-Directed Search

A comparison in the context of layout synthesis

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’92

Abstract

Two systems for layout synthesis, Loos and Wright and the approaches underlying them are compared, Loos uses a form of hierarchical generate-and-test and Wright disjunctive constraint satisfaction, a form of constraint-directed search, Loos implements a constructive approach that adds objects sequentially, while Wright uses a reductionist approach that satisfies constraints incrementally. The comparisons are based on a series of experiments in which the systems were used to solve identical layout problems and to produce insights at very detailed levels. The conclusions are tentative, as the experiments are still going on at the time of writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baykan C.A.: 1991, Formulating spatial layout as a disjunctive constraint satisfaction problem. Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykan C.A. and Fox M.S.: 1991, Constraint satisfaction techniques for spatial planning. In P.J.W.ten Hagen, P.J.Veerkamp (Ed.), Intelligent CAD Systems HI Practical Experience and Evaluation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykan C.A. and Fox M.S.: forthcoming, WRIGHT: A constraint-based spatial layout system. In C. Tong and D. Sriram (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B., Sutherland, Georgia and Feigenbaum, E.A.: 1969, HEURISTIC DENDRAL: a program for generating explanatory hypotheses in organic chemistry. In Meltzer, B. and Michie, D. (Ed.), Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, R.F.: 1991, ABLOOS: An evolving hierarchical design framework. Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, R.F. and Flemming, U.: 1990, Planning in design synthesis - Abstraction-based LOOS. In J. Gero (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V. Vol I: Design (Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, Boston, MA). New York: Springer (Computational Mechanics Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, Charles M.: 1973, Automated space planning. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U.: 1978, Wall representations of rectangular dissections and their use in automated space allocation. Environment and Planning B, 5, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U.: 1979, Representing an infinite set of solutions through a finite set of principal options. A. Seidel and S. Danford (Eds.), Proc. 10th Conf. of the Environmental Design Research Association. Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U., Coyne, R., Glavin, T. and Rychener, M.: 1988, A generative expert system for the design of building layouts - version 2. In J. Gero (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Engineering: Design (Proceedings of the Third International Conference, Palo Alto, CA). New York: Elsevier (Computational Mechanics Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U.: 1989, More on the representation and generation of loosely packed arrangements of rectangles. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 16, 327–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U., Coyne, R. F., Glavin, T., Hung Hsi, Rychener, M. D.: 1989, A generative expert system for the design of building layouts (final report). Report EDRC 48-15-89, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox M.S., Sadeh N., and Baykan C.: 1989, Constrained heuristic search. Proceedings of IJCAI-11., IJCAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralick R.M. and Elliott G.L.: 1980, Increasing tree search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems. AI, 14, 263–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth A.K.: 1977, Consistency in networks of relations. AI, 8, 99–118.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Purdom P.W.: 1983, Search rearrangement backtracking and polynomial average time. AI, 27, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M. et al.: 1983, Basic concepts for building expert systems. In Hayes-Roth, F. et al. (Eds.), Building Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supowit, K.J. and Slutz, E.A.: 1984, Placement algorithms for custom VLSI. Computer Aided Design, 16, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flemming, U., Baykan, C.A., Coyne, R.F., Fox, M.S. (1992). Hierarchical Generate-and-Test vs Constraint-Directed Search. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’92. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2787-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2787-5_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5238-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2787-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics