Abstract
Rational choice theory has become very fashionable in all social sciences, from anthropology to history. Actually it is not a theory but a family of models that share two simple and attractive ideas. One of them is the version of the Rationality Postulate according to which people know what is best for them, and act accordingly. The other basic idea is that this feature of human cognition, valuation, choice, volition and action is all we need to know in order to account for social life anywhere and at any time. This is of course the Methodological Individualism Postulate. These two ideas, if true, would be extraordinarily powerful. Indeed, they would allow us to explain, predict and plan all human actions in any society. Furthermore, they would unify all of the social sciences and sociotechnologies. No wonder then that rational choice models have been mushrooming over the past half century in all of the so-called human sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abernathy, W.J. (1978), The Productivity Dilemma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Agassi, J. (1977), Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Akerlof, G.A. (1984), An Economic Theorists Book of Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, E. (1991), ‘The limbic system and culture,’ Human Nature, vol. 2, pp. 117–136.
Becker, G.S. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G.S. & W.M. Landes, eds. (1974), Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Benn, S.I. & G.W. Mortimore, eds. (1976), Rationality in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bidwell, C.E. & N.E. Friedkin (1988), ‘The sociology of education’, In N.J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 449–471.
Boudon, R. (1974), Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.
Boudon, R. (1981), The Logic of Social Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boudon, R. (1990), L’artde sepersuader des ideesfausses,fragiles ou douteuses. Paris:Fayard.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1981), The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bunge, M. (1967), Scientific Research, 2 vols. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag.
Bunge, M. (1979), ‘A systems concept of society: Beyond individualism and holism’, Theory and Decision, Vol. 10, pp. 13–30.
Bunge, M. (1989), ‘Game theory is not a useful tool for the political scientist’, Epistemologia, Vol. 12, pp. 195–212.
Bunge, M. (1992), ‘A critical examination of the foundations of rational choice theory. In J. Götschl (ed.), Towards a Theory of Man and Society. Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer.
Bunge, M. & R. Ardila (1987), Philosophy of Psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag
Coleman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cross, J.G. & M.J. Guyer (1980), Social Traps. Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan Press.
d’Encausse, H.C. (1978), Ľempire éelaté. Paris: Flammarion.
Dexter, L.A. (1990), ‘Intra-agency politics: Conflict and contravention in administrative Entities’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 2, pp. 151–172.
Dosi, G. (1982), ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories’, Research Policy, vol. 11, pp. 147–162.
Elster, J. (1989), The Cement of Society. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press. Evans, B. (1946), The Natural History of Nonsense. New York: A. A. Knopf.
Frank, R.H. (1985), Choosing the Right Pond. Human Behaviour and the Quest for Status. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, R.H. (1988), Passions Within Reason. The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York-London:WW. Norton.
Freeman, C. (1988), ‘Introduction’ to G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London-New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 1–8
Granovetter, M. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embed- deness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, pp. 481–510.
Halsey, A.H. (1990), ‘Educational systems and the economy’, Current Sociology, Vol. 38, pp. 79–101.
Hardin, G. (1958), ‘Tragedy of the commons’, Science, Vol. 162, pp. 1243–1247.
Harris, M. (1989), Our Kind. New York: Harper & Row.
Hirschman, A.O. (1977), The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Iannaccone, L.R. (1991), ‘The consequences of religious market structure’, Rationality and Society, Vol. 3, pp. 156–17.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic & A. Tversky, eds. (1982), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luce, R.D. & H. Raiffa (1957), Games and Decisions. Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Majone, G. (1989), Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Marx, K. (1859), ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy’, In K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works New York: International Publishers, 1986, pp. 181–185.
Merton, R.K. (1973), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moser, P.K., ed. (1990), Rationality in Action. Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1971), The Logic of Collective Action, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pitkin, W. (1932), A Short Introduction to the History of Human Stupidity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
Rapoport, A. (1989), Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour. Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer.
Rosegger, G. (1989), ‘Von der Ueberforderung der orthodoxen Wirtschaftstheorie –am Beispiel der technischen Wandels’, Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftsforschung, Vol. 5, pp. 23–35.
Stevens, G., D. Owens and E.C. Schaefer (1990), ‘Education and attractiveness in marriage choices’, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 53, pp. 62–70.
Stinchcomb, A.L. (1990) ‘Comment’, Rationality and Society, Vol. 2, pp. 214–223.
Swedberg, R. (1990), Economics and Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press. Tsebelis, (1990), ‘Penalty has no impact on crime: A game-theoretic analysis’, Rationality and Society, Vol. 2, pp. 255–268.
Von Neumann, J. & O. Morgenstern (1947), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bunge, M. (1995). The Poverty of Rational Choice Theory. In: Jarvie, I.C., Laor, N. (eds) Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 161. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4211-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0471-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive