Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 4))

Abstract

Perception is man’s primary form of cognitive contact with the world around him. As all conceptual knowledge is based upon or derived from this primary form of awareness, the study of perception has always had a unique significance for philosophy and science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. JM Nielsen, Agnosia, Apraxia, Aphasia, Hafner Publishing Co., New York, 1962, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N Geschwind, ‘Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man’, Brain 88 (1965) 237–294, 585–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LJ Audus, ‘The Mechanism of the Perception of Gravity by Plants’, in Biological Receptor Mechanisms, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, University Press, Cambridge, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MW Nirenberg, in Brain Function: RNA and Brain Function in Memory and Learning (ed. by MAB Brazier ), University of California Press, Berkeley, 1964, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R Efron, ‘Biology without Consciousness - and its Consequences’, Persp. Biol. and Med. 11 (1967) 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R Efron, ‘The Duration of the Present’, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 138 (1967) 713–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ME Wilson, (a) Spatial and Temporal Summation in Defective Fields of Vision, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of London, (b) Hue Similarity, 1968. - (c) Vision Research (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H Klüver, ‘Visual Disturbances after Cerebral Lesions’, The Psychol. Bull. 24 (1927) 316–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NK Humphrey, and L Weiskrantz, ‘Vision in Monkeys after Removal of the Striate Cortex’, Nature 215 (1967) 595–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. GH Le Hardy, G Rand, and MC Rittler, Pseudoisochromatic Plates, Copyright by American Optical Co., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H Klüver, and PC Bucy, ‘Preliminary Analysis of Functions of the Temporal Lobes in Monkeys’, Arch. Neurol Psychiat. 42 (1939) 979–998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert S. Cohen Marx W. Wartofsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Efron, R. (1969). What is Perception?. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3378-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3378-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3380-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3378-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics