Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 40))

Abstract

In this paper, I will present evidence that every verb of action is embedded in the object complement of a two-place predicate whose subject is identical to the subject of the action verb, and whose phonological realization in English is do. That is, such sentences as (1) will be derived from such structures as that shown in (2) by some rule such as that shown in (3).1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, S. R., ‘Pro-Sentential Forms and Their Implications for English Sentence Structure’, NSF-20 p. VI–1–43, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E. and Harms, R., Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E. and Peters, S., ‘Pseudo-cleft Sentences’, unpublished University of Texas ditto, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Current Issues in Linguistic Theory’, in The Structure of Language, Readings in the Philosophy of Language (ed. by J. Fodor and J. Katz), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y. (1964), p. 50–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Remarks on Nominalizations’, in Readings in Transformational Grammar (ed. by R. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum), Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass., 1970, p. 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and Halle, M., The Sound Pattern pf English, Harper and Row, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D., ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by N. Rescher), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa. (1967), p. 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraci, R., ‘On the Deep Question of Pseudo-clefts’, unpublished MIT ditto, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C., ‘The Case for Case’, in Bach and Harms, (1968), p. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, D. T, Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and Katz, J. J., The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, J., ‘On the Derivation of Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses’, unpublished paper, 1970,

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., ‘Stative Verbs and Adjectives’, in Mathematical Linguistics and Machine Translation, Report NSF-17, the Computation Laboratory of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., ‘On Derivational Constraints’, in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics, Chicago, III., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., Irregularity in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Ross, J. R., ‘A Criterion for Verb Phrase Constituency’, in Mathematical Linguistics and Machine Translation, Report NSF-17, the Computation Laboratory of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Ross, J. R., Abstract Syntax (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R., Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. G., ‘Do from Occur’, Working-Papers in Linguistics No. 3, pp. 1–21, Technical Report No. 69–4 to the National Science Foundation from the Computer and Information Science Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, R. and Klima, E., ‘Rules for English Pronominalization’, Language 34 (1963), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J., ‘A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences’, Foundations of Language 3 (1967), p. 390–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J., ‘The Role of Semantics in Grammar’, in Bach and Harms, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J., ‘English as a VSO Language’, Language 46 (1970), 286–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J., ‘Tense and Time Reference in English’, in Fillmore and Langendoen, p. 97–113, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakau, M., Sentential Complementation in Japanese, unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, D. (in press), Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P., ‘Limitations of Phrase Structure Grammars’, in Fodor and Katz, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P., ‘Underlying and Superficial Constituent Structure’, in Modern Studies in English (ed. by D. Reibel and S. Shane), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P., ‘On the Surface Verb Remind’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 1, 1970a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P., ‘On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion’, Linguistic Inquiry 1. 4, 1970b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P., Crossover Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P. and Ross, J. R., ‘Tough-Movement si, Tough Deletion no!’, to appear in Linguistic Inquiry 2. 4, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reibel, D. and Schane, S., Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P., The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., Constraints on Variables in Syntax, unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., ‘Auxiliaries as Main Verbs’, in Studies in Philosophical Linguistics (ed. by W. Todd), Series One, Great Expectations Press, Carbondale, III., 1969a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., ‘Guess Who?’ in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics, Chicago, III., 1969b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., ‘Adjectives as Noun Phrases’, in Reibel and Schane, 1969c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., ‘Doubling’, to appear in Linguistic Inquiry, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R., ‘Mirror Image Rules and VSO order’, to appear in Linguistic Inquiry 2. 4, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 John Robert Ross

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ross, J.R. (1972). Act. In: Davidson, D., Harman, G. (eds) Semantics of Natural Language. Synthese Library, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0310-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2557-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics