Skip to main content

A Representation of Relation Algebras Using Routley-Meyer Frames

  • Chapter
Logic, Meaning and Computation

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 305))

Abstract

A representation of relation algebras is given by modifying the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic. This semantics is similar to the Kripke semantics for intutionistic logic, but its frames use a ternary accessibility relation instead of a binary one. The representation is foreshadowed in the work of Lyndon as well as by the representation of Boolean algebras with operators by Jónsson and Tarski, but the aim here is to make it explicit and to connect it to the related representations of algebras arising in the study of relevance logic as well as other “substructural logics,” e.g., linear logic. A philosophical interpretation is given of the representation, showing that an element of a relation algebra can be understood as a set of relations, rather than as the intended interpretation as a single relation. It is shown how a Routley-Meyer frame can be represented so its states are relations, and an interpretation is provided in terms of a “relational database”. Connections are mentioned to recent work by Jon Barwise on “information channels” between “sites” and by J. M. Dunn and R. K. Meyer on a ternary frame semantics for combinatory logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allwein, G., and J. M. Dunn 1993 A Kripke semantics for linear logic, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 58, pp. 514–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R., and N. D. Belnap et al. 1975 Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R, N. D. Belnap, and J. M. Dunn et al. 1992 Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. 1993 Constraints, channels, and the flow of information, Situation theory and its applications (S. Peters and D. Israel, editors), vol. 3, CSLI Lecture Notes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, G. 1967 Realism, University of Milwaukee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialynicki-Birula, A., and H. Rasiowa 1957 On the representation of quasi-Boolean algebras, Bulletin de V Académie Polonaise des Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 259–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. 1967 Lattice theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F. H. 1897 Appearance and reality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and D. Gurr 1995 Relations and non-commutative linear logic, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, vol. 105, pp. 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. 1951 The weak theory of implication, Kontrolliertes Denken, Untersuchgen zum Logikkalkul und zur Logik der Einzelwissenschaften, (A. Menne, A. Wilhelmy, and H. Angsil, editors), Kommissions-Verlag Karl Alber, Munich, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dŏsen, K. 1992 A brief survey of frames for the peirce calculus, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 38, pp. 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1966 The algebra of intensional logics, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor; portions relevant to this paper are reprinted in Anderson, Belnap et al. 1975 as §8 and §28.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1982 A Relational Representation of quasi-Boolean algebras, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 23, pp. 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1986 Relevance logic and entailment, Handbook of philosophical logic (D. Gab-bay and F. Guenthner, editors), vol. 3, Reidel, pp. 117–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1991 Gaggle theory: An abstraction of Galois connections and residuation with applications to negation and various logical operations, Logics in AI, Proceedings European workshop JELIA 1990 (J. van Eijck, editor), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 478, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1993a Partial-gaggles applied to substructural logics, Substructural logic (P. Schröder-Heister and K. DOsen, editors), Oxford Press, pp. 63–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. 1993b Perp and star: Two treatments of negation, Philosophical perspectives: Philosophy of language and logic (J. Tomberlin, editor), vol. 7, pp. 331–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M., and R. K. Meyer 1997 Combinatore and structurally free logic, Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 5, pp. 505–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J.-Y. 1987 Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 50, pp. 1–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyssens, M., L. V. Saxton, and D. van Gucht 1993 Tagging as an alternative to object creation, Proceedings of the conference on query processing in object-oriented, complex-object and nested relation databases.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, B., and A. Tarski 1951-52 Boolean algebras with operators, American Journal of Mathematics, vols. 73-74, pp. 891–939, 127–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraegeloh, K.-D., and P. C. Lockemann 1976 Hierarchies of database languages: An example, Information Systems, vol. 1, pp. 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. 1958 The mathematics of sentence structure, American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 65, pp. 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, R. C. 1950 The representation of relation algebras, Annals of Mathematics, ser. 2, vol. 51, pp. 707–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, R. 1991 The origin of relation algebras in the development of the axiomatization of relations, Studia Logica, vol. 91, pp. 421–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K. 1979 A Boolean valued semantics for R, Research Paper no. 4, Logic group, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., M. Bunder, and L. Powers 1991 Implementing the ‘fool’s model’ for combinatory logic, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 7, pp. 597–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., and M. A. McRobbie 1982 Multisets and relevant implication, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 60, pp. 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., and R. Routley 1972 Algebraic analysis of entailment, Logique et Analyse, n.s., vol. 15, pp. 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., and R. Routley 1973 Classical relevant logics (I), Studia Logica, vol. 32, pp. 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., and R. Routley 1974 Classical relevant logics (II), Studia Logica, vol. 33, pp. 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlowska, E. 1992 Relational proof systems for relevant logics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 57, pp. 1425–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, V. 1991 Action logic and pure induction, Logics in AI, Proceedings of the European workshop JELIA 1990 (J. van Eijck, editor), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 478, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R., and R. K. Meyer 1972 The semantics of entailment, II-III, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 1, pp. 53–73, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R., and R. K. Meyer 1973 The semantics of entailment, Truth, syntax and modality (H. Leblanc, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 199–243.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. S. 1976 Data types as lattices, SIAM Journal of Computing, vol. 5, pp. 522–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder-Heister, P., and K. DOsen 1993 (editors), Substructural logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. 1936 The theory of representations for Boolean algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 40, pp. 37–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. 1937 Topological representations of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics, Časopsis pro Pěstovaní Matematiky a Fysiky, vol. 67, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. 1941 On the calculus of relations, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 6, pp. 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A., and S. Givant 1985 A formalization of set theory without variables, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 41, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. 1991 Language in action: Categories, lambdas and dynamic logic, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 130, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., and R. P. Dilworth 1939 Residuated lattices, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 45, pp. 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunn, J.M. (2001). A Representation of Relation Algebras Using Routley-Meyer Frames. In: Anderson, C.A., Zelëny, M. (eds) Logic, Meaning and Computation. Synthese Library, vol 305. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0526-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0526-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3891-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0526-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics