Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 59))

Abstract

According to a wide-spread view science grows linearly and cumulatively. Brick is laid upon brick, and in this way the edifice of science is slowly but constantly growing. But studies of the history of science have shown that the development of science is far more dramatic. There are scientific revolutions which do not leave stone upon stone.1 Thus the scientist is not only a master builder, but also a demolition expert; and science is growing like a modern town: old houses are destroyed and replaced by new ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Brand, G.: (1971), Die Lebenswelt: Eine Philosophie des konkreten Apriori, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H.: (1970), ‘The “Orthodox” View of Theories: Remarks in Defense As Well As Critique’, in Radner and Winokur, 1970, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.: (1970), ‘On the “Standard Conception” of Scientific Theories’, in Radner and Winokur, 1970, pp. 142–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: (1954), Concepts of Space, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: (1957), Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, J. J.: (1966), Phenomenology and Physical Science: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physical Science, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: (1970), ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Lakatos and Musgrave, 1970, pp. 91–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.): (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: (1859), On Liberty, Reprinted in On Liberty, Representational Government, The Subjection of Women: Three Essays, The World’s Classics, Oxford University Press, London 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: (1978), ‘Evidential Support, Falsification, Heuristics, and Anarchism’, in Radnitzky and Andersson, 1978, pp. 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F.: (1892), Also sprach Zarathustra, Kröner Taschenbuch 75, Alfred Kröner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: (1934), Logik der Forschung, Julius Springer, Wien (mit der Jahresangabe 1935 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, translation of Popper, 1934, with new appendices. Hutchinson and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: (1963), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 2nd revised ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.): (1970), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, G. and Andersson, G. (eds.): (1978), Progress and Rationality in Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 58, Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: (l913), Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophic, Band 2: Theorie und Erfahrung, Studienausgabe, Teil D: Logische Analyse der Struktur ausgereifter physikalischer Theorien, ‘Non-statement view’ von Theorien,’ Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J.: (1978), ‘The Popperian Approach to Scientific Knowledge’, in Radnitzky and Andersson, 1978, pp. 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: (1978), ‘The Ways in Which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper’s Methodology’, in Radnitzky and Andersson, 1978, pp. 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, E.: (1978), 4 ‘“Crucial” Experiments: A Case Study’, in Radnitzky and Andersson, 1978, pp. 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andersson, G. (1979). Presuppositions, Problems, Progress. In: Radnitzky, G., Andersson, G. (eds) The Structure and Development of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 59. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9459-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9459-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9459-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics