Skip to main content

Abstract

The increasing scale, complexity, and practical success of econometric modelling in recent years requires a rethinking of its foundations. Econometricians have made do with a formal description of the nature and objectives of their work which relies too heavily on the example of the experimental sciences, and thereby gives an incomplete and misleading picture. As a result, we have shown occasional confusion in judging or setting standards for empirical work. Perhaps worse, we have left ourselves open to apparently devastating criticism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansley, Craig and Wecker, William F. (1980), “The signal extraction approach to linear and nonlinear regression problems”, mimeo, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burks, Arthur W. (1977), “Chance, cause, reason: an inquiry into the nature of scientific evidence”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Finetti, Bruno (1972), “Probability, induction and statistics”, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freedman, David, “Some pitfalls in large econometric models: a case study”, Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 54, pp. 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geisser, Seymour (1980), “A predictivist primer”, in “Bayesian analysis in econometrics and statistics”, Arnold Zellner (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geweke, John (1975), “The dynamic factor analysis of economic time series”, in “Latent variables in socio-economic models”, D. Aigner and A. Goldberger (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hildreth, Clifford (1963), “Bayesian statisticians and remote clients”, Econometrica, 31, pp. 422–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koopmans, Tjailing (1947), “Measurement without theory”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 29, pp. 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1976), “Mathematical versus experimental traditions in the development of physical science”, Journal of interdisciplinary history, 7, pp. 1–31. Reprinted in The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindley, D.V. (1972), “Bayesian statistics, a review”, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litterman, Robert L., “A Bayesian procedure for forecasting with vector autoregressions”, Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lucas, Robert E. (1975), “Macro-economic policy making: a critique”, Journal of Monetary Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palm, Franz (1981), “Structural econometric modeling and time series analysis: an integrated approach”, Free University, Amsterdam, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Savage, Leonard G. (1981), “The writings of Leonard Jimmie Savage: a memorial selection”, American Statistical Association and Institute of Mathematical Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Savage, Leonard J. (1977), “The shifting foundations of statistics”, in “Logic laws and life”, R. Colodny (ed.), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. Reprinted in [14].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shiller, Robert (1973), “A distributed lag estimator derived from smoothness priors, Econometrica, 41, pp. 775–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sims, C.A. (1980), “Macroeconomics and reality”, Econometrica, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sims, C.A. (1972), “Annals of mathematical statistics”.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sims, C.A. (1972), “The role of approximate prior restrictions in distributed lag estimation”, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sims, C.A. (1977), “Exogeneity and causal orderings in macroeconomic models”, in “New methods in business cycle research”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Whittle, P. (1957), “Curve and periodgram smoothing”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sims, C.A. (1982). Scientific Standards in Econometric Modeling. In: Hazewinkel, M., Kan, A.H.G.R. (eds) Current Developments in the Interface: Economics, Econometrics, Mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7933-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7933-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7935-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7933-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics