Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Energy, Participation and Planning: The Case of Electricity Generation in Great Britain

  • Chapter
Geographical Dimensions of Energy

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 5))

Abstract

This paper shows how issues and conflicts over power station proposals in the United Kingdom have changed and developed during the past three decades, then looks to the future to consider whether planning and democratic procedures will be able to cope with anticipated development pressures. It is argued that current planning ‘delays’ result from a long established trend towards greater concern for environmental quality, superimposed on the emergence of ‘generic’ issues since the mid-1970’s. There is consensus that the present situation is unsatisfactory, but reforms proposed by development interests and environmental groups (broadly defined) reflect fundamentally different views about policy and participation. Several scenarios are explored in the final section and it is concluded that in spite of a ‘remission’ from development pressures due largely to the current recession, there is little room for complacency about conflicts over power station developments in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, J. 1984. Quoted in ‘Costs row puts future of Sizewell in doubt.’ The Observer 8.1.84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldock, A. T. 1972. Report on a public hearing into an application by the Central Electricity Generating Board to construct a nuclear power station at Portskewett in Gwent. London: Department of Trade Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, S. K. et al. 1976. The growth of the environment as a political issue in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 6: 245–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, C. 1981. The Stansted controversy: No way to the airport. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Electricity Generating Board. 1980. Policy and planning procedures. Submission to Commission on Energy and the Environment’s ‘Coal Study.’ London: CEGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Electricity Generating Board. 1982. Scenarios and electricity demand. Proof of Evidence P5 for Sizewell ‘B’ Power Station Public Inquiry. London: CEGB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Public Accounts. 1984. The development of nuclear power. 32nd Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrove, S. and Duff, A. 1981. Environmentalism, values and social change. Britain Journal of Sociology 32: 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Science and Society, Justice and Outer Circle Policy Unit. 1979. The big public inquiry. London: OCPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for the Preservation of Rural England. 1959. Annual report. London: CPRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for the Protection of Rural England. 1982. Statement of case for the Sizewell ‘B’ public inquiry. London: CPRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. 1981. Corporatism and the corporate state in Britain. Teaching Politics 10: 288–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy. 1978. Energy policy: A consultative document. Command 7101. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment. 1976. Procedure for consultation and consent for new electricity generating stations and overhead lines. DoE Circular 34/76. London: Department of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry, R. 1975. Review of the development control system. Final Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drapkin, D. B. 1974. Development, electricity and power stations: problems in electricity planning decisions. Public Law 19: 220–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. and Rowan-Robinson, J. 1979. Whatever happened to the planning inquiry commission? Discussion Paper 79–104. Aberdeen: Department of Political Economy, University of Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electricity Council. 1984. Medium term development plan 1984–91. London: The Electricity Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N. 1984. An economic evaluation of the Sizewell decision. Energy Policy 12: 288–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischoff, B. et al. 1981. Lay foibles and expert fables in judgement about risks. In Progress in resource management and environmental planning, eds. O’Riordan T., and Turner, R. K. Vol. 3. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, C. I. K. 1974. Fuel policy work 1952–1972: A report. London: Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, J. et al. 1980. Socio-economic impacts of power stations developments (2 Vols.). Oxford: Department of Town Planning, Oxford Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. 1971. The price of amenity. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove-White, R. 1979. Environmental pressure groups, energy policy and the new political climate. In council for the protection of rural England. Energy policy and local planning. Proceedings of a Symposium held in London, May 1979. London. CPRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove-White, R. 1984. Director of CPRE, Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrook, L. G. 1972. Report of a Public Inquiry into an Application by the Central Electricity Generating Board for consent to the construction of a generating station at Inswork Point in Cornwall. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Hansard 542, Session 1955–56. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on Energy. 1981. First report. The government’s statement on the new nuclear power programme, Vol. 1, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, F. R. 1975. Planning and development of major generation and transmission projects. London: Central Electricity Generating Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T. 1980. Speech to Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, N. 1982. Letter from the Secretary of State for Energy to Sir Frank Layfield Q.C. on the subject of funding objectors at the Sizewell Inquiry (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Layfield, Sir Frank. 1982. Letter to the Secretary of State for Energy on the subject of funding objectors at the Sizewell Inquiry (July 18th).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, G. et al. 1979. A low energy strategy for the UK. London: Science Reviews Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. 1977. Soft energy paths: Towards an durable peace. San Francisco, CA: Friends of the Earth International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. D. and Goyder, J. 1983. Environmental groups in politics. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuslan, P. 1979. The ideologies of planning law. Urban Law and Policy 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1981. Environmentalism (2nd Edition). London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, S. E., Hills, P. R. and Cope, D. R. 1983. Energy policy and land use planning: A report to the Social Science Research Council. London: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peak Park Joint Planning Board Press Release. 1983. CEGB shelves power station plans for Longdendale—but only temporarily. (27th July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. 1978. The nuclear debate is about values. Nature 274: 200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. et al. 1979. Decision making for energy futures. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Political Ecology Research Group. 1978. Public participation and energy policy. Oxford Report No. 6. Oxford: PERG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, M., Kemp. R. and O’Riordan, T. 1984. The context and conduct of the Sizewell B Inquiry. Energy Policy 12: 277–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. J. and Jordan, A. G. 1979. Governing under pressure: The policy process in a post-parliamentary democracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 1976. Sixth report on nuclear power and the environment. Cmnd. 6618. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. 1983. Risk assessment. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Town Planning Institute. The public and planning: Means to better participation. London: RTPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbach, F. 1980. Environment, ideology and policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgemore, B. 1981. The secret constitution. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, P. 1978. Speech on ‘Major Public Inquiries’ by the then Secretary of State for the Environment, Manchester (13th September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. E. 1983. Political geography, politics and the state. Social Science Research Journal 8: 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkie, D. 1982. The motorway age. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suffolk Preservation Society. 1982. ‘Dozens of nuclear power stations: Highly confidential list published,’ Press Release 16.9.82. Lavenham, Suffolk, S.P.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surrey, J. and Huggett, C. 1976. Opposition to nuclear power: A review of international experience. Energy Policy 4: 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, C. 1982. The costs of nuclear power. London: Anti-Nuclear Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. 1977. The struggle against nuclear power in Central Europe. Ecologist 7: 216–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Town and Country Planning Association. 1978. Statement on energy policy and public inquiries. London: TCPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. 1984. Nuclear industry--the road ahead. Atom 333: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1980. The nuclear power decisions. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. 1975. The rhetoric of consensus politics: A critical review of technology assessment. Research Policy 4: 108–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. 1983. Nuclear decision-making--rationality or ritual? London: British Society for the History of Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK

    Susan Owens

Authors
  1. Susan Owens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geography and Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, USA

    Frank J. Calzonetti

  2. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., USA

    Frank J. Calzonetti  & Barry D. Solomon  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Owens, S. (1985). Energy, Participation and Planning: The Case of Electricity Generation in Great Britain. In: Calzonetti, F.J., Solomon, B.D. (eds) Geographical Dimensions of Energy. The GeoJournal Library, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5416-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5416-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8890-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5416-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation