Skip to main content

The Chimera’s Diary

  • Chapter
The Logic of Being

Part of the book series: Synthese Historical Library ((SYHL,volume 28))

Abstract

My feelings towards philosophers are mixed. For centuries they have used me as an experimental animal, keeping me on a minimum of being. In a way I may owe them my “life”, but their experiments have weakened me so much that the end may be drawing near. If my weakness proves fatal, please inform the Centaur, Goat-Stag and Pegasus, who are my next of kin. If the philosophers kill me, I expect them to keep at least one of my relatives alive in order to continue the experiments. If we are all doomed, I would like to secure us a place in man’s memory. This is why I have put together these extracts from my diary, recording the sufferings to which I and my tribe have been subjected.

This paper reproduces the manuscript left by the chimera, but I have added references to books and manuscripts, plus a few notes which appear in square brackets. The reader will notice that the chimera has wisely disregarded accidental changes of philosophers’ choices of example when they need a composite animal. The chimera takes remarks about, e.g., the goat-stag as remarks aimed at itself. As a matter of fact, Aristotle and the Greek Aristotelian commentators prefer the goat-stag (τϱαγελαϕος) and the centaur (ίππο∈έvταυϱος). In the Hellenistic period, the centaur, the scylla and the chimera are the standard examples. In Latin medieval texts the chimera (inherited from Manlius Boethius) is vastly more popular than any of the other composite animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abaelardus, Petrus: 1970, Dialectica, ed. by L. M. de Rijk, 2nd ed. (Wijsgerige Teksten en Studies I), Van Gorcurn, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertus Magnus: 1890, ‘Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum’, in A. Borgnet (ed.), Opera. Vol. 2, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymus Moraux: 1979, Commentarium in Porphyrii Introductionem (my title), in Paul Moraux, ‘Ein unedicrter Kurzkommentar zu Porphyrios’ Isagoge’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 35, 55–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymus Taran: 1978, Int. ≂ Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione (Codex Parisinus Graecus 2064). ed. by L. Taran (Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, Heft 95), Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles: 1831, Opera ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri, Vols. 1-2, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J.: 1977, ‘Chimeras and Imaginary Objects: A Study in the Post-Medieval Theory of Signification’, Vivarium 15, 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Roger: 1911, Compendium Studii Theologiae, ed. by H. Rashdall, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus: 1877, Int. ed. 1 ≂ Commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAEΣ, pars prior, ed. by C. Meiser, Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus: 1880, Int. ed. 1 ≂ same edition, pars posterior, Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhuis, H. A. G.: 1977, ‘The Views of William of Sherwood on Some Semantical Topics and Their Relation to Those of Roger Bacon’, Vivarium 15, 111–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braakhuis, H. A. G.: 1979, De 13de eeuwse tractaten over syncategorematische termen, 2 vols. (Diss., Leiden), Meppel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhuis, H. A. G.: 1981, ‘English Tracts on Syncategorematic Terms from Robert Bacon to Walter Burley’, in Braakhuis et al, (1981), pp. 131–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhuis, H. A. G., C. H. Kneepkens, and L. M. De Rijk (eds.): 1981, English Logic and Semantics from the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh, Artistarium, Supplementa 1, Ingenium Publishers, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridanus, Johannes: 1977, Sophismata, ed. by T. K. Scott (=Grammatica Speculativa 1). Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart — Bad-Cannstat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridanus, Johannes: 1957, Summulae, tractatus 4, in M. E. Reina (ed.), ‘Giovanni Buridano, “Tractatus de Suppositionibus”’ Rivista critica di storia della filosojia 12, 175–208 and 323-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassin, B.: 1980, Si Parmenide, Cahiers de philologie publiés par le Centre de Recherche Philologique de l’Université de Lille III, Vol. 4, Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Presses Universitaires de Lille.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Libera, A.: 1981, ‘Roger Bacon et le problème de l’appellatio univoca’, in Braakhuis et al. (1981). pp. 193–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rijk, L. M.: 1981a, ‘Die Wirkung der neuplatonischen Semantik auf das mittelalterliche Denken’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 13, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rijk, L. M.: 1981b, ‘Abailard’s Semantic Views in the Light of Later Developments’, in Braakhuis et al. (1981), pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S.: 1979, ‘The Dead Man is Alive’, Synthese 40, 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S.: 1981a, Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi, 3 vols. (Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum VII. 1-3), E. J. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S.: 1981b, ‘Albert (the Great?)’s Companion to the Organon’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 14, 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S.: 1981c, ‘The Present King of France Wears Hypothetical Shoes with Categorical Laces. Twelfth-century Writers on Well-forrnedness’, Medioevo 7, 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S.: 1984, ‘Proof and its Limits According to Buridan, Summulae 8’, in Z. Kaluza and P. Vignaux (eds.), Preuve et raisons à l’Université de Paris. Logique, ontologie et theologie au XIV stècle, Vrin, Paris, pp. 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, S. and J. Pinborg: 1970, ‘Studies in the Logical Writings Attributed to Boethius de Dacia’, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age grec et latin, Universitè de Copenhague 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ps-Elias, Intr. = Pseudo-Elias (Pseudo-David), Lectures on Porphyry’s Isagoge, ed. by L. G. Westerink, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredborg, K. M.: 1981, ‘Roger Bacon on “Impositio vocis ad significandum”’ in Braakhuis et al. (1981), pp. 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlfinger, D.: 1975, ‘Edizione critica del testo del “De ideis” di Aristotele’, in W. Leszl (ed.), II ‘De ideis’ di Aristotele e la teoria Platonica delle idee (Accademia Toscana di scienze e lettere ‘La Colombaria’, Studi 40, pp. 17ff), Olschki, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilwardby, Robert: 1976, De Ortu Scientiarum, ed. by A. G. Judy (Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 4). The British Academy/The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewry, O.: 1978, Robert Kilwardby’s Writings on the Logica Vetus (Diss., Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewry, O.: 1981a, ‘Robert Kilwardby on Meaning’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 13, 376–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewry, O.: 1981b, ‘The Oxford Condemnations of 1277 in Logic and Grammar’, in Braakhuis et al. (1981), pp. 235–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucretius: 1947, De rerum natura, ed. by C. Bailey, 3 vols., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, Guillelmus de: 1979, Expositio super libros Elenchorum, ed. by F. del Punta (Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Opera Philosophica 3), St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, Guillelmus de: 1978, Expositio in librum Perihermenias, ed. by A. Garnbatese and S. Brown (Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Opera Philosophica 2), St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, Guillelmus de: 1977-1979, Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum, Ordinatio, ed. by G. I. Etzkorn and F. E. Kelley (Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Opera Theologica 3-4), St. Bonaventure University, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, Guillelmus de: 1974, Summa Logicae, ed. by Ph. Boehner, G. Gal, and S. Brown (Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Opera Philosophica I), St. Bonaventure, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenides: 196612, Fragmenta, in H. Diels and W. Kranz (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Vol. 1, Weidmann, Dublin/Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinborg, Jan: 1974, ‘Zur Philosophie des Boethius de Dacia. Ein Überblick’, Studia Mediewistyczne 15, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinborg, Jan: 1976a, ‘Diskussionen urn die Wissenschaftstheorie an der Artistenfakultät’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 10, 240–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinborg, Jan: 1976b, ‘The Summulae, Tractatus I De Introductionibus’, in J. Pinborg (ed.), The Logic of John Buridan (Opuscula Graecolatina 9), Museum Tusculanum, Copenhagen pp. 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijk, L. M. de: see De Rijk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Kilwardby: see Kilwardby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. N.: 1960, ‘A Chimera is a Chimera: A Medieval Tautology’, Journal of the History of Ideas 21, 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger Bacon: see Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus: 1935, Adversus Mathematicos VII — VIII, in Sextus Empiricus, with an English translation by R. G. Bury, Vol. 2, Loeb Classical Library, London/Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon de Faverisham: 1957, Quaestiones super libroPerihermeneias, in Opera omnia, Vol. 1: Opera Iogica, tomus prior, ed. by P. Mazzarella, Cedam, Padova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon de Faverisharn: 1984, Quaestiones super libro Elenchorum, ed. by S. Ebbesen et al. (Studies and Texts 60), Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies: Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ebbesen, S. (1986). The Chimera’s Diary. In: Knuuttila, S., Hintikka, J. (eds) The Logic of Being. Synthese Historical Library, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4780-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4780-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2371-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4780-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics