Skip to main content

Decision Making Under Ambiguity: A Note

  • Chapter
Risk, Decision and Rationality

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 9))

Abstract

In 1961, Daniel Ellsberg used the following choice problem to demonstrate that expressions of uncertainty are not totally captured by the concept of “probability.” Imagine two urns, each containing red and black balls. Although it is known that Urn 1 contains 100 balls, the proportions of red and black balls are unknown. Urn 2, on the other hand, contains 50 red and 50 black balls. Furthermore, imagine that you can win $100 by naming the appropriate color (red or black) of a ball to be drawn at random from Urn 1. Would you bet on red, black, or be indifferent between the two? What would your answer be if the drawing were to be made from Urn 2?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, S. W., and Brownson, F. O. 1964. ‘What price ambiguity? Or the role of ambiguity in decision making.’ Journal of Political Economy 72: 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. 1985. ‘Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference.’ Psychological Review 92: 433–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. 1986. ‘Decision making under ambiguity.’ Journal of Business, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. ‘Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. and Sahlin, N. E. 1982. ‘Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making.’ Synthese 53: 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, W. M., and Einhorn, H. J. In press. ‘Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.’Psychological Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. and Kunreuther, H. C. 1985. ‘Ambiguity and insurance decisions.’ American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 75: 386–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, F. W. 1953. ‘Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes.’ Journal of Personality 21: 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory.: An analysis of decision under risk.’ Econometrica 47: 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Narens, L. 1985. ‘Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type.’ Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29: 1–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. W. 1951. ‘The effect of probability, desirability, and “privilege” on the stated expectations of children.’ Journal of Personality 19: 332–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, T. E., and Isen, A. M. 1985. ‘Examining probability estimation: Evidence for dual subjective probability functions. ’Paper presented at the Psychonomics Society Meetings, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Einhorn, H.J., Hogarth, R.M. (1988). Decision Making Under Ambiguity: A Note. In: Munier, B.R. (eds) Risk, Decision and Rationality. Theory and Decision Library, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4019-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4019-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8283-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4019-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics