Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper is a review of the “State of the Art” in recovery estimation, from the theoretical and practical point of view. After a recall on early methods, some of them being still usefull, the main methods currently employed are compared in the case of point recovery: namely indicator kriging, disjunctive kriging, conditional distribution. The pratice of each method is reviewed then in the important case of block recovery, including a comparison of the change-of-support methods involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CGMM refers to Centre de Geostatistique et Morphologie Mathématiques, 35 rue Saint Honoré — 77300 FONTAINEBLEAU APCOM refers to the various conferences named: “Application of Computer methods to the Mining Industry”.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beckmann P. (1973): “Orthogonal polynomials for engineers and physicist” Cohen Press, Boulder, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouchind’homme JF (1980): “Estimation de l’Uranium récupérable sur les gisements sédimentaires stratiformes exploitables à ciel ouvert” Doctor Ing. Thesis University of Nancy, INPL.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David M. (1972): Grade tonnage curve, use and misuse in ore reserve estimation. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall., p: 129, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David M. (1973): Dagbert M. and Besliles JM. (1977): “The practice of porphyry copper deposit estimation for grade and ore-waste tonnage demonstrated by several case studies”. Pro. 15th APCOM, AUSTRALIAN I. M.M. Parkville.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David M. (1977): “Geostatistical ore reserve estimation” Elsevier 1977. p: 313, 320.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guibal D., Remacre A. (1983): “Local estimation of recoverable reserves: comparing various methods witch the reality on a porphyry copper deposit” to be published on the proceeding, NATO-ASI TAHOE-83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson M., Marechal A. (1979): “Recoverable reserves estimated by disjunctive kriging: a case study” Proceeding, 16th APCOM, S.M.E-AIME, New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Journel A. (1973): “Le formalisme des relations ressources-reserves, Simulations de gisements miniers”, Revue de l’Industrie Minérale, section Mines 4. p: 214, 226.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Journel A. (1980): “The lognormal approach to predicting local distributions of selective mining unit grades” Mathematical Geology, Vol 13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Journel A. (1982): “Indicator approach to spatial distributions” Proc. of 17 APCOM, Denver, published by AIME

    Google Scholar 

  12. Journel A. (1983): “Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions” Math. Geology, Vol 15 n° 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Journel A, Huijbregts Ch. (1978): “Mining geostatistics” Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marbeau JP., Marechal A. (1980): “Geostatistical estimation of uranium ore reserves”. Invited review paper in “Uranium evaluation and mining techniques” IAEA Vienna 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marechal A. (1972a): “El problema de la curva tonelage-ley de corte y su estimation” Boletin de geostatistica, Vol 1 (May 1972 ). Universidad de Chile, Satiago.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marechal A. (1972b): El problema de la estimation de la distribution local de leyes, Bol Geostatistica Vol 4, n° 72. p: 55, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marechal A. (1974): “Généralités sur les fonctions de transfert” Internal Report M-384 CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marechal A. (1975): Analyse numérique des anamorphosees gaussiennes. Internal Report CGMM 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marechal A. (1975): “Forecasting a grade-tonnage distribution for various panel sizes” Proceedings, 13th APCOM Clausthal, R.F.A.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marechal A., Touffait Y. (1980): “Recovery estimation of non-stationary orebody using disjunctive kriging”. Proceedings, Computer methods for the mining industry Meeting Moscou 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marechal A. (1982): “Local recovery estimation for co- products by disjunctive kriging”. Proceeding of 17th APCOM, Denver, AIME.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matheron G. (1972): “Le krigeage disjonctif”. Internal report CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matheron G. (1974): “Les fonctions de tranfert des petits panneaux”. Internal report N-395. CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matheron G. (1976): “Forecasting block grade distributions: the tranfer functions”. Proceedings 15th NATO-ASI “Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry”.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matheron G. (1978): “Peut-on imposer des conditions d’universalité au krigeage?”. Internal report n° CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matheron G. (1980): “Modeles isofactoriels pour l’effet zero”. CGMM Internal Report N-659 June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Matheron G. (1981a): “Remarques sur le changement de support”. Internal Report n° N-690 Feb. 1981. CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matheron G (1981b): “La sélectivité des distributions”. Internal Report n° N-686 Feb. 1981. CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matheron G. (1982): “La déstructuration des hautes teneurs et le krigeage des indicatrices”. Internal Report N-761. CGMM.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matheron G. (1983): “Isofactorial models and change of support” to be published in Proceedings, NATO-ASI. TAHOE-83

    Google Scholar 

  31. Verly G. (1983): “The multigaussian approach and its applications to the estimation of local recoveries”. Mathematical Geology, Vol. 15. n° 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muge F. (1982): “The role of recuperation functions in the early stage of the mine planning of an iron orebody”. Proceedings of 17th APCOM, AIME Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parker H. (1975): “The geostatistical evaluation of ore reserves using conditional probability distributions: a case study for the area 5 Prospect, Warren, Maine”. Ph. D. Thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parker HM. (1975) and Switzer P.: Use of conditional probability distribution in ore reserve estimation, a case study. Proc. 13th APCOM Symp. Clausthal, W. Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parker H., Journel A., Dixon W. (1979): “The use of conditional lognormal probability distribution for the estimation of open-pit ore reserves in strata-bound Uranium deposit”. 16th APCOM Proceeding AIME, AIME, Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Williamson D.R. and Mueller E, (1976): “Ore estimation at Cyprus Pima Mine”. AIME Annual Meeting. Las Vegas (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marechal, A. (1984). Recovery Estimation: A Review of Models and Methods. In: Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A.G., Marechal, A. (eds) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8157-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3699-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics