Abstract
Some forty years ago Edmund Husserl spoke publicly for the first time of a new phenomenological psychology. He saw this new psychology as a discipline that was destined to play an important role in the already established empirical psychology as well as in philosophy. Subsequently under the influence of his ideas an extensive phenomenological psychological movement began to spread through various European countries. When a careful analysis of this phenomenological movement is made, one becomes aware of a number of clearly distinguishable currents and schools, all of which claim Husserl as their origin. The truth is, however, that only a very few psychologists actually use Husserl’s concepts without making major modifications. Furthermore, many psychologists talk about phenomenology without stipulating precisely what is meant by the term. To compound the difficulties there is noticeable in phenomenological literature a frequent failure to make a clear distinction between Husserl’s thought and that of other phenomenologists such as Scheler, Heidegger, Jaspers, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre and Binswanger.
“Husserl’s Original View on Phenomenological Psychology” by Joseph J. Kockelmans from PHENOMENOLOGY: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Its Interpretation, edited by Joseph J. Kockelmans. Copyright © 1967 by Joseph J. Kockelmans. Reprinted by permission of Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edmund Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band IV) (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1954). English translation by David Can: The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970). For the foregoing remarks see: Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences: A Contribution to a New Scientific Ideal (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1963), pp. 245–248.
Hermann Drüe, Edmund Husserls System der phänomenologischen Psychologie (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1963);
Joseph J. Kockelmans, Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology: A Historico-critical Study (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1967);
Aron Gurwitsch, Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966).
Edmund Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik. Psychologische und logische Untersuchungen, Erster Band (Halle a.S.: Pfeiffer, 1891).
Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle a.S.: Niemeyer, 1900–1901). English translation of the second edition by J.N. Findlay: Logical Investigations, 2 vols. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970).
Edmund Husserl, Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen (1907), herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band II) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian: The Idea of Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950).
Edmund Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band III) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by F. Kersten: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982).
Edmund Husserl, “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft,” in Logos, 1 (1910–1911), pp. 289–341. English translation by Quentin Lauer, Edmund Husserl: Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 69–147. See also: Cross Currents, 6(1956), pp. 228–246 and pp. 324–44.
Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie (1925), herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band IX) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962). English translation by John Scanlon: Phenomenological Psychology, Summer Semester, 1925 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977).
Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische PsychologieThe Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962 Ibid., pp. 46–51.
“Phenomenology,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed. (London, 1927), vol. 17, cls. 699 702.
“Amsterdamer Vorträge,” in Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 302–349.
Edmund Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, herausgegeben von Stephan Strasser (Husserliana, Band I) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by Dorion Cairns: Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960).
Edmund Husserl, Krisis, pp. 238–269.
Joseph J. Kockelmans, Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology, Chapter VI and the literature quoted there.
Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 4–13. See also: Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 2 vols. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960), Vol. I, pp. 150–151.
Edmund Husserl, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft, pp. 299–322 (90–110).
Ibid., pp. 302–323(92–94).
Ibid., pp. 303–305(95–96).
Ibid., pp. 305–309(96–98).
Ibid., pp. 309–312(98–102).
Ibid., pp. 312–314(102–103).
Ibid., pp. 314–322(103–110).
Edmund Husserl, “Amsterdamer Vorträge,” in Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 302–349.
Ibid., pp. 302–303.
Ibid., p. 303.
Ibid., pp. 303–304.
Ibid., pp. 304–305.
Ibid., p. 305.
Ibid., p. 305.
Ibid., pp. 307–308.
Ibid., pp. 308–309.
Ibid., p. 309.
Ibid., pp. 309–310.
Ibid., pp. 310–311.
Ibid., pp. 311–312.
Ibid., p. 312.
Ibid., p. 312.
Ibid., pp. 312–314.
Ibid., pp. 314–315.
Ibid., p. 316.
Ibid., p. 316.
Ibid., pp. 315–321.
. Ibid., pp. 321–324.
. Ibid., pp. 324–325.
. Ibid., p. 325.
Ibid., pp. 326–328.
Ibid., p. 328.
Edmund Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen, pp. 48–63 (7–23).
Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 331–342.
Ibid., pp. 343–344.
. Ibid., p. 46.
Ibid., p. 46–51.
Edmund Husserl, Krisis, pp. 238–260.
Ibid., pp. 261–269.
Joseph J. Kockelmans, Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology, Chapter VI.
Ibid., pp. 314–351; also see the literature quoted there, particularly: Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, pp. 245–320; L. Landgrebe, Philosophie der Gegenwart (Bonn: Athenäum Verlag, 1952), Chapter 1; Der Weg der Phänomenologie (Gütersloh: Mohn, 1963);
Walter Biemel, “Husserls Encyclopaedia Britannica Artikel und Heideggers Anmerkungen dazu,” in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 12 (1950), pp. 246–289;
Paul Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of his Phenomenology, trans. Edward Ballard and Lester Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967);
Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: Mohr, 1960); English translation: Truth and Method (New York: The Seabury Press, 1975).
Edmund Husserl, Ms. 37 IV 26, quoted by Drüe, op.cit., p. 242.
Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (London: SCM Press, 1962), pp. 49–63; History of the Concept of Time, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), pp. 13–131;
William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963), pp. viii-xxii.
Joseph J. Kockelmans, “World-Constitution: Reflections on Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism,” in A.-T. Tymieniecka, ed., Analecta Husserliana, vol. I (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1971), pp. 11–35;
William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963) op. cit., pp. 16–24.
Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, pp. 244–256.
Ibid., pp. 61–63; cf. Hans-Georg Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 250–289 (pp. 235–274).
Cf. Heidegger’s draft of the article on phenomenology to be included in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, in Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 256–263, pp. 590–603; Jean-Paul Sartre, The Emotions: Outline of a Theory, trans. Bernard Frechtman (New York: Philosophical Library, 1948), Introduction, pp. 1–21, cf. also pp. 92–4;
Karl Jaspers, General Psychopathology, trans. J. Hoenig and M. Hamilton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 55–154. The fact that Jaspers objects to Husserl’s Wesensschau does not alter the fact that he, too, maintains the possibility of a descriptive study of psychic phenomena.
Cf. Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, passim.
Cf. Jean-Paul Sartre, The Emotions, pp. 1–21. 65. Ibid., pp. 93–94.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kockelmans, J.J. (1987). Husserl’s Original View on Phenomenological Psychology. In: Kockelmans, J.J. (eds) Phenomenological Psychology. Phaenomenologica, vol 103. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3589-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3589-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8105-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3589-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive