Abstract
In the past decade business ethicists in the United States have called into question the classical formulation of the purpose of business, i.e., the purpose of a corporation is to maximise profits for stockholders. In place of the profit maximisation view a number of alternative theories of the function of the firm have arisen such as:
-
1.
The corporation should seek profits so long as it does not cause avoidable harm or unduly infringe upon human rights (for example, Simon et al., 1972);
-
2.
The corporation should seek to do social good (correct social problems) as well as seek profit (for example, Davis, 1975);
-
3.
The corporation should seek to produce life sustaining and enhancing goods and services (Camenisch, 1981);
-
4.
The corporation should seek to maximise the interests of the various corporate stakeholders rather than simply the interests of the stockholders (Freeman, 1984).
The thesis of this paper was originally proposed in Bowie (1988).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, D.: 1976, The Cultural Contradiction of Capitalism, New York: Basic Books.
Bowie, N.E.: 1985, “Should Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations Be Less Adversarial?”, Journal of Bussiness Ethics, 4,283–291.
Bowie, N.E: 1988, “The Paradox of Profit”, in N. Dale Wright (ed), Papers on the Ethics of Administration, Provo, Utah: University of Brigham Young Press, 97–118.
Camenisch, P.: 1981, “Business Ethics or Getting to the Heart of the Matter,” Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1 (Fall), 59–69.
Davis, K.: 1975, “Five Propositions for Social Responsibility,” Business Horizons, XVIII, 3 (June), 19–24.
Douglas, M.: 1986, How Institutions Think, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gini, A.R. and TJ. Sullivan: 1987, “Work: The Process and the Person”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 649–655.
Guth, W., R. Schmittberger and B. Schwarze: 1987, “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining,” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3, 367–88.
Schwartz, A.: 1982, “Meaningful Work”, Ethics, 92, (July) 634–646.
Simon, J.G., C.W. Powers and J. P. Gunnemann: 1972, The Ethical Investor: Universities and Corporate Responsibility, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bowie, N.E. (1990). Empowering People as an End for Business. In: Enderle, G., Almond, B., Argandoña, A. (eds) People in Corporations. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2083-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2083-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7435-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2083-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive