Skip to main content

The Force and the Reason of Experiment

For Françoise Bastide. In memoriam

  • Chapter
Experimental Inquiries

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 8))

Abstract

In this famous report of what may be the oldest public scientific experiment, several features are remarkable. The performance has almost certainly never been staged (at least with a fully loaded ship);1 it is thus a tale of a staged thought experiment, but a story which for hundreds of years played a continuous role in shaping the relations between Kings, mathematics, war and mechanics. It is a public show before all the assembled ‘media’. It is a direct application of a theoretical demonstration that Archimedes had just completed following a Platonist research program that Plutarch sketches in the paragraph before. It is Archimedes himself who takes the initiative of boasting to the King that he can move the Earth; the King, quite reasonably, challenges him to a ‘show down’ by way of a smaller scale public experiment before believing in the demonstration, as if he was unable to be convinced by the strength of mathematics alone; but it is the King who, in an instant, makes the connection of this striking but futile experiment with a technical and military research program headed by Archimedes (o demiurgos) to protect Syracuse against the Romans.

Archimedes, who was a kinsman and friend of King Hiero, wrote to him that with any given force it was possible to move any given weight; and emboldened, as we are told, by the strength of his demonstration, he declared that, if there were another Earth, and he could go to it, he could move this one. Hiero was astonished and begged him to put his proposition into execution, and show him some great weight moved by a slight force. Archimedes therefore fixed upon a three masted merchantman of the royal fleet, which had been dragged ashore by the great labours of many men, and after putting on board many passengers and the customary freight, he seated himself at a distance from her, and without any great effort, but quietly setting in motion with his hand a system of compound pulleys, drew her towards him smoothly and evenly, as though she were gliding through the water. Amazed at this, then, and comprehending the power of his art (sunnoesas tes tecnes ten dunamin), the King persuaded Archimedes to prepare for him offensive and defensive engines to be used in every kind of siege warfare.

(Plutarch, 1961: xiv, 78–9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, A. & Zempeni, A. (1972). Le baton de l’aveugle: Divination, maladie et pouvoir chez les Moudangdu Tchad. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Authier, M. (1989). Archimede ou le canon du savant. In Elements d’histoire des sciences; ed. M. Serres. Paris: Bordas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastide, Françoise, (in preparation) La semiotique des textes scientifiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, A (1981). The social basis of scientific discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J. & Rip, A, eds. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1985). Changingorder: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1983). Representingand intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. (1970). African thought and Western science. In Rationality, ed. B.R. Wilson, pp. 131–71. Oxford: Blackwell’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. (1982). Tradition and modernity revisited. In Rationality and relativism, ed. R. Mollis & C. Lukes. Oxford: Blackwell’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1988a) Tall tales or true stories? Baudin, Peron, and the Tasmanians, 1802. In Nature in its greatest extent, ed. R. MacLeod & P. Rehbock, pp. 47–72. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1988b). Philosophical travellers at the ends of the earth: Baudin, Peron and the Tasmanians. In Australian science in the making, ed. R.W. Home, pp. 34–63. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism, a new name for some old ways of thinking. London: Longman, Green, & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. (1986) The fortunes of inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., ed. (1985). Les ‘vues’ de l’esprit. Culture technique, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. In Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of culture, ed. H. Kuclick. London: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1986). On the method of long distance control. In Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law. Sociological Monographs 32, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (1986). Confronting nature: The sociology of solar neutrino detection. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plombey, N.J.B. (1983). The Baudin expedition and the Tasmanian aborigines, 1802. Hobart: Blubber Head Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch. (1961). Lives. Trans. Bernadotte Perrin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1988). Entre le temps et l’eternite. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton: Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • University Press. Serres, M. (1987). Statues. Paris: Editions François Bourin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1988). Science the very idea. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latour, B. (1990). The Force and the Reason of Experiment. In: Le Grand, H.E. (eds) Experimental Inquiries. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2057-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2057-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7423-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2057-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics