Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk comparisons and risk communication: Issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risks

  • Chapter
Communicating Risks to the Public

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 4))

Abstract

In response to rising public fears and concerns about hazardous activities and technologies, analysts and policy makers have increasingly advocated risk comparison as a means for improving public perceptions and understanding of health and environmental risks. Several authors have argued, for example, that the risks of new substance, activity, or technology can best be understood and appreciated by comparing the risks of the substance, activity, or technology with the risks of more common or familiar substances, activities, and technologies (e.g., Wilson 1979; 1987;, Cohen and Lee, 1979; Crouch and Wilson, 1982; 1984;, Ames et al., 1983; 1987;, Morrall, 1986). Basic assumptions underlying the argument are that comparisons help put risks in psychological perspective, that they provide a conceptual yardstick, that they improve understanding of risk magnitudes, and that they are more intuitively meaningful than absolute numerical probabilities (e.g., Slovic and Fischhoff, 1982; Morrall, 1986; Wilson, 1987).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, H.I. and A. Weinberg. 1978. “An Approach to Setting Radiation Standards,” Health Physics 34: 719–720.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, B.N. 1983. “Dietary Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens,” Science, Vol. 221 (23 Sept. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, B.N., R. Magaw, and L.S. Gold. 1987. “Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards,” Science Vol. 236 (17 April 1987): 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, S. 1980. “Assessing and Managing Industrial Risk,” Chemical Engineering, September 8, 1980: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atomic Energy Commission. 1974. “Comparative Risk-Cost-Benefit Study of Alternative Sources of Electrical Energy,” Report WASH-1224. Washington, D.C.: Atomic Energy Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram, M. 1988. “Use of Comparative Risk Methods in Regulatory and Common Law,” Columbia Law Review, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, M. 1987. “Tools for Environmental Professionals Involved in Risk Communication at Hazardous Waste Facilities Undergoing Siting, Permitting, or Remediation.” Report No. 87–30.8. Reston, Virginia: Air Pollution Control Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, I., Kates, R., and G. White. 1978. The Environment as Hazard. Oxford University Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., K.H. Craik, and K.M. Dake. 1986. “Contemporary Worldviews and Perception of the Technological System,” in V. Covello, J. Menkes, and J. Mumpower (eds.), Risk Evaluation and Management, New York: Plenum, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. 1977. “An Initial Comparative Assessment of Orbital and Terrestrial Solar Power Plants.” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Report 900–780, Pasadena, California, March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.V. and D.K. Pritchard. 1980. “Comparative Risks of Electricity Production Systems: A Critical Survey of the Literature”, Health and Safety Executive, Research Paper 11, HMSO: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B.L. 1980. “Society’s Valuation of Life Saving in Radiation Protection and Other Contexts,” Health Physics, Vol. 38, (January 1980): 33–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B.L. 1981a. “Long Term Consequences of the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Relationship for Chemical Carcinogens, Risk Analysis, 1(4): 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B.L. 1981b. “Perspective on Occupational Mortality Rates,” Health Physics 40: 703–724.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B.L. and I. Lee. 1979. “A Catalog of Risks,” Health Physics 36: 707–722.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comar, C. and Sagan, L. 1976. “Health Effects of Energy Production and Conversion”, Annual Review of Energy, v. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation Foundation. 1985. Risk Assessment and Risk Control, Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality. 1984. Environmental Quality: Annual Report, Washington, D.C.: Council on Environmental Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T. 1983. “The Perception of Technological Risks: A Literature Review”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23: 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T. 1985. “Uses of Social and Behavioral Research on Risk.” Environment International, 1984, 10, June: 541–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V.T. and C. Hadlock. 1985. Probabilistic Risk Assessment: the State of the Art, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V.T., von Winterfeldt, D., and Slovic, P. 1986. “Communicating Scientific Information about Health and Environmental risks: Problems and Opportunities from a Social and Behavioral Perspective”. In V. Covello, A. Moghissi, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (eds.) Uncertainties in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. New York: Plenum Press. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V.T., P. Sandman, and P. Slovic. 1988a. Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparisons. Washington, D.C.: Chemical Manufacturers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V., D. McCallum, and M. Pavlova, eds. 1988b. Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernmental Organizations. New York: Plenum (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. 1985. “Psychological Perspectives on Technology as Societal Option, Source of Hazard, and Generator of Environmental Impacts. In V.T. Covello, J.L. Mumpower, P.J.M. Stallen, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (eds.), Technology Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment and Risk Analysis: Contributions from the Psychological and Decision Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, E. and R. Wilson. 1982. Risk/Benefit Analysis, Ballinger, Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, E. and R. Wilson. 1984. “Inter-Risk Comparisons,” in J. V. Rodricks and R. G. Tardiff (eds.), Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.C., V.T. Covello, and F.W. Allen (eds.). 1987, Risk Communication. Washington, D.C: The Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinman, B.D. 1980. “The Reality and Acceptance of Risk,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 244(11): 1126–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, R. and R. Peto. 1981. “The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the U.S. Today.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Vol. 66, pp. 1191–1308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. 1982. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T.C. 1984. “Risk Communication: A Marketing Approach,” in Proceedings of the National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Risk Communication. Los Angeles: Risk Communication Laboratory, Institute for Safety and Systems Management, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbud, M. 1984. “Sources of Ionizing Radiation Exposure,” Environment, Vol. 26 (10), December 1984, 6–11, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency. 1984. Risk Assessment and Management: Framework for Decision Making, Report no. EPA/600/9–85/002. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Vol. I., Overview Report. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis, February, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1982. Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the United States by Industry (1982), Bulletin 2196, pp. 35–36, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. and J. Schwartz. 1984. “Letter to Science on cancer and diet,” Science, (18 May 1984): 660–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson. R. 1981. Comparative Risks of Electricity Generating Fuel Systems in the U.K., Peter Peregrinus Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessenden-Raden, J., J. Fitchen, and J. Heath. 1987. “Risk Communication at the Local Level: A Complex Interactive Progress,” Science, Technology and Human Values. December, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. 1985. “Managing Risk Perception,” Issues in Science and Technology, 2(1): 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., and Hope, C 1984. “Defining risk”. Policy Sciences, 17: 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. 1979. “Weighing the Risks,” Environment 21 (4): 17–20 and 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. 1983. “The Public Versus the Experts: Perceived Versus Imagined Sources of Disagreements about Risks,” in V. Covello, G. Flamm, J. Rodricks, and R. Tardiff (eds.), The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks, New York: Plenum. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, S. Derby, and R. Keeney. 1981. Acceptable Risk, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gori, G. 1982. “The regulation of carcinogenic hazards.” in Risk in the Technological Society, C. Hohenemser and J. Kasperson (eds.), Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J.D. and Vaupel, J.W. 1981. “Value of Life: What Difference Does It Make? Risk Analysis 1(1): 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. 1978. “A Risk-Risk Analysis of Nitrite” Working Paper. Boston: Department of Nutritional Food Science, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. 1981. “Comparative Risks from Different Energy Systems,” Mazingira, Vol. 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hance, B., C. Chess, and P. Sandman. 1987. Improving Dialogue with Communities: A Risk Communication Manual for Government. Trenton, New Jersey, Office of Science and Research, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, December, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, P. 1979. “Some Comments on Risk Assessment,” in National Research Council, Current Issues and Studies, Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J., C. Swanson, and P. Reddy. 1979. “A Risky Business: Energy Production and the Inhaber Report. Environment 21(6): 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, G. (ed.). 1977. “Assessment of R&D Resources, Health and Environmental Effects, O&M Costs, and Other Social Costs for Conventional and Terrestrial Solar Electric Plants.” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Report 900–782, Pasadena, California, January, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenemser, C, R.W. Kates, and P. Slovic. 1983. “The Nature of Technological Hazard,” Science 220: 378–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. 1982. “Energy Hazards: What to Measure, What to Compare?” Technology Review 85 (3): 31–38, 74–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J., K. Anderson, P. Gleick, I. Minier, G. Morris, and K. Smith. 1979. “Risk of Renewable Energy Resources: A Critique of the Inhaber Report”. ERG 79–3. Berkeley: Berkeley Energy and Resources Group, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  • House, P, J. Coleman, R. Shull, R. Matheny, and J. Hock. 1981. “Comparing Energy Technology Alternatives from an Environmental Perspective”. DOE/EV-0109, Wash., D.C., Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrekk, H. and Morgan, M.G. 1987. “Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Non-Technical People,” Risk Analysis (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhaber, H. 1979. “Risks with Energy from Conventional and Nonconventional Sources,” Science 203: 718–723.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. and V. Covello (eds.). 1987. The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk: Essays on Risk Selection and Perception. Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H. 1979. “Symposium/Workshop on Nuclear and Nonnuclear Energy Systems: Risk Assessment and Governmental Decision Making,” February 5–7, 1979, Washington, D.C, the MITRE Corporation, Metrek Division, MTR-79W00335, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. and A. Tversky. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames,” American Psychologist, April 1984, 39:4.: 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.). 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. 1986. “Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance to Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis, 6: 275–282.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. and J. Kasperson. 1983. “Determining the Acceptability of Risk: Ethical and Policy Issues,” in J. Rogers and D. Bates, (eds.), Risk: A Symposium, Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. and H. Kunreuther (eds.). 1986. Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond . Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R. Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B., and Katz, N. 1978. Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. and H. Simon. 1987. “Why is a Diagram (Sometimes) Worth a Thousand Words,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 11: 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, J. and J. Linnerooth. 1982. “The role of risk assessment in a political decision process,” in P. Humphreys and A. Vari (eds.), Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L. 1981. The Strategy of Social Regulation, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L. 1984. “Regulating Risks,” Risk Analysis 4: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L.B. 1987. “Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions,” Science, Vol. 236 (17 April 1987): 291–295.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L. and L. Freeburg. 1973. “Health Effects of Electricity Generation from Coal, Oil, and Nuclear Fuel,” Nuclear Safety, Vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L. and L. Freeburg. 1974. “Health Costs Associated with the Mining, Transport, and Combustion of Coal in the Steam Electric Industry,” Nature, Vol. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, E. W., M. V Jones, and R. M. Jones. 1984. “Comparative Risk Assessment: Towards an Analytical Framework,” Kansas City: Midwest Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, J.P. 1987. “Estimates of the Probability of Job-Related Death in 347 Occupations,” Journal of Occupational Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 6 (June): 510–519.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Coombs, B. 1978. “Judged frequency of lethal events”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4: 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litai, D., D. Lanning, and N.C. Rasmussen. 1981. “The public perception of risk,” in The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks, V.T. Covello, W. Flamm, J. Rodricks, and R. Tardiff (eds.), pp. 213–233. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, W. W. 1976. Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety. Los Altos, CA: Kaufman, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, W. W. 1983. “The Agenda for Risk Decisionmaking,” Environment 25(10): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, W.W. 1987. “Risk Assessment,” The Scientist 1(14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. 1982. “Big Nuclear Accidents,” paper presented at the International Conference on Nuclear Power Experience, Vienna, September 13–17, 1982 IAEA-CN-42/18, International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, B.J., Pauker, S.G., Sox, H.C., and Tversky, A. 1982. “On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies,” New England Journal of Medicine 306: 1259–1262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merkhofer, M. 1985. “The Use of Risk Comparisons to Aid the Communication and Interpretation of Risk Analysis for Regulatory Decision Making,” Report No. ADA-85–2047. Menlo Park: Applied Decision Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkhofer, M. and V. Covello. 1984. Risk Assessment and Risk Assessment Methods: The State-of-the-Art, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midwest Research Institute. 1984. Comparison of Risks and Costs of Hazardous Waste Alternatives: Methods Development and Pilot Studies . Draft Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MRI Report No. 8551-L. Kansas City: Midwest Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.G., P. Slovic, I. Nair, D. Geisler, D. MacGregor, B. Fischhoff, B. Lincoln, and K. Florig. 1985. “Powerline Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields: A Pilot Study of Risk Perceptions,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 5: 139–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrall, J. 1986. “A Review of the Record,” Regulation 10(2): 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1976. The National Highway Safety Needs Report, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Radiological Protection Board. 1986. Living with Radiation, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences. 1978. Saccharin: Technical Assessment of Risks and Benefits. Committee for a Study on Saccharin and Food Safety Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1983. Risk Analysis in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Safety Council. 1982. Accident Facts. Chicago: National Safety Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. and L.D. Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1975. “Reactor Safety Study,” WASH-1400 (NUREG/74/104), Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1978. “Risk assessment review group report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” September 1978 NUREG/CR-0400, Washington, D.C: NTIS/PB-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1987. Reactor Risk Reference Document, NUREG-1150, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1985. “Chemical Carcinogens: A Review of the Science and Associated Principles, Federal Register, Vol. 50(50), March 14, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H. J. 1980. “Risk perception: A psychological perspective”. In M. Dierkes, S. Edwards, and R Coppock (eds.) Technological Risk: Its Perspective and Handling in Europe, Boston: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H., Maurer, D. and Thomas, K. 1978. “Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance”. Futures, 10: 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H.J. and v. Winterfeldt, D. 1982. “Beyond acceptable risk: on the social acceptability of technologies”. Policy Sciences, 8: 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochin, E.E. 1974. “Occupational and Other Fatality Rates,” Community Health, 6(2): 2–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pochin, E.E. 1975. “The Acceptance of Risk,” British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 31(3): 184–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reissland, J. and V. Harries. 1979. “A Scale for Measuring Risks,” New Scientist 803: 809–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, N. 1979. “Coming to Grips with Risk,” address presented on BBC television, reprinted in the Wall Street Journal, May 13, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W.D. 1984. Evaluation Methods for Environmental Standards. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, L. 1972. “Human Costs of Nuclear Power,” Science, Vol. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandman, P. 1986. Explaining Environmental Risk. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W., G. McClelland, B. Hurd, and J. Smith. 1986. Improving Accuracy and Reducing Costs of Environmental Benefits Assessment. Vol. IV. Boulder: University of Colorado, Center for Economic Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. 1984. “The social fabric of risk”. American Sociological Review, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddall, E. 1981. “Risk, Fear, and Public Safety,”. AECL Report No. 7404. Mississauga: AECL CANDU Operations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk,” Science 236: 280–285.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. 1980. “Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk.” In R. Schwing and W.A. Albers (Eds.), Social Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. 1981. “Informing the Public About the Risks from Ionizing Radiation,” Health Physics 4(4): 589–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., and B. Fischhoff. 1982. “How Safe is Safe Enough? Determinants of Perceived and Acceptable Risk,” in Gould and Walker (eds.), Too Hot to Handle, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1980. “Informing People about Risk,” in M. Maziz, L. Morris, and I. Barofsky (eds.), Banbury Report 6, The Banbury Center, old Spring Harbor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1982. “Facts versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risks (Revision),” in Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.): 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. 1979. “Strength of Belief and Risk,” Policy Sciences 11: 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.K., W.D. Desvousges, and A. Fisher. 1987. Communicating Radon Risk Effectively: A Mid-Course Evaluation, Report No. CR-811075. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowby, F. D. 1965. “Radiation and Other Risks,” Health Physics 11: 879–887.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. 1969. “Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk,” Science 165: 1232–1238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J. 1988. “Not to Worry…,” Hippocrates, January/February 1988, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Winterfeldt, D. and W. Edwards. 1984. “Patterns of Conflict About Risky Technologies,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 4(1): 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. 1977. “Accident Rates and Acceptable Risk Levels for Airplanes and Their Systems.” in Council on Science and Society, The Acceptability of Risk, London: Barry Rose, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, C. 1980. “Comparisons of Risk,” paper presented at a Joint MURS/NAS Seminar on Risk Assessment and Decision Process, Orsay, France, December 17–19, 1980, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 1979. “Analyzing the Daily Risks of Life,” Technology Review 81: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 1984. “Commentary: Risks and Their Acceptability,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 9 (2), Spring, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 1987. “Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An Introduction,” Science, Vol. 23 (17 April 1987): 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 1976. World Health Statistics Annual. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Vincent T. Covello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. C.E.N.T.E.D., Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA

    Roger E. Kasperson

  2. Institute for Environment and Systems Analysis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Pieter Jan M. Stallen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Covello, V.T. (1991). Risk comparisons and risk communication: Issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risks. In: Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M. (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7372-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1952-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation