Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Series Entomologica ((SENT,volume 53))

  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

Several authors (Hairston et al., 1960; Strong et al., 1984; Jermy, 1985) have questioned the frequent occurrence and overall importance of interspecific competition between phytophagous insects. Recent reevaluations of such relations (Damman, 1993; Denno et al., 1995), however, once again point to the role of competition in determining the structure of phytophagous insect communities, especially of those that exploit discrete resources such as seed predators. They emphasise that besides direct competition there are more subtle types, such as resource- and natural enemy-mediated interactions. While the former considers the importance of herbivore-induced changes in the resource affecting herbivore fitness, the latter refers to apparent competition of which avoidance is possible by entering enemy-free space, hence specialisation. We analyse niche relations of a predispersal seed predator (pre-DSP) guild on the basis of distribution data gained by the examination of seed predation (SP) in pods of wild-grown Vicia spp. collected in Hungary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alley, T. R., 1982. Competition theory, evolution, and the concept of ecological niche. Acta Biotheoretica 31: 165–179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashar, A., G. Fabres, M. Hossaert, M. Valero & V. Labeyrie, 1987. Bruchus affinis and the flowers of Lathyrus latifolius: an example of the complexity of relations between plants and phytophagous insects. In: V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres & D. Lachaise (eds), Insects-Plants, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, Pau 1986. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damman, H., 1993. Patterns of interaction among herbivore species. In: N. Stamp & T. Casey (eds), Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Routlege Chapman & Hall, New York: 132–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno, R. F, M. S. McClure & J. R. Ott, 1995. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: Competition reexamined and resurrected. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 297–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, S. H., 1990. Structural damage to oak leaves alters natural enemy attack on a leafminer. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 57: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N. G., F. E. Smith & L. B. Slobodkin, 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 44: 421–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, T., 1985. Is there competition between phytophagous insects? Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 23: 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. H., 1984. Non-competitive populations, non-convergent communities, and vacant niches: the herbivores of bracken. In: D. R. Strong Jr., D. Simberloff, L. G. Abele & A. B. Thistle (eds), Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 67–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E., 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, J., 1995. Significant braconid wasps in the Hungarian plant protection practice (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Növényvédelem, 30: 493–507 (In Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman & Co, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. R., J. H. Lawton & T. R. E. Southwood, 1984. Insects on Plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentesi, Á. & T. Jermy, 1995. Predispersal seed predation in leguminous species: seed morphology and bruchid distribution. Oikos: 73: 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb, 1968. Hora Europaea, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szentesi, Á., Jermy, T., Takács, V. (1996). Niche relations in Vicia-inhabiting Bruchus spp.. In: Städler, E., Rowell-Rahier, M., Bauer, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Series Entomologica, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1720-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1720-0_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1720-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics