Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 183))

  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the adverse effects of atrial fibrillation. Previously considered a relatively benign arrhythmia it is now recognised to be a major cause of preventable stroke and may cause left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence of poorly controlled ventricular rate patients may experience symptoms of palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness, particularly where underlying cardiac disease renders the myocardium less compliant. This risk of stroke is not confined to subjects with rheumatic valvular heart diseases but has become well established in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. The risk of stroke is reduced but not eliminated by oral anticoagulant therapy hence the increasing interest in maintenance of sinus rhythm wherever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpert MA, Curtis JJ, Sanfelippo JF et al. Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 958–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutton R, Kenny RA. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. [Review]. PACE 1986; 9: 1110–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Markewitz A, Schad N, Hemmer W, Bernheim C, Ciavolella M, Weinhold C. What is the most appropriate stimulation mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction? PACE 1986; 9: 1115–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schuller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J 1988; 116: 16–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Langenfeld H, Grimm W, Maisch B, Kochsiek K. Atrial fibrillation and embolic complications in paced patients. PACE 1988; 11: 1667–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feuer JM, Shandling AH, Messenger JC. Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long-term development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 1376–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Camm AJ, Katritsis D. Ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome — a risky business? PACE 1990; 13: 695–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, Cacciatore G, Cini R, Turitto G. Relation of pronosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 729–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo G, Cazzamalli L, Bonandi L, Dei Cas L. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 2076–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blomer H. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1990; 13: 2080–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1542–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD. The role of pacing modality in determining long-term survival in the sick sinus syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 359–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD et al. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation 1993; 88: 1045–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Trohman RG, Castle LW, Maloney JD. Single-chamber ventricular pacing is not associated with worsening heart failure in sick sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 693–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamas G A, Estes NM, Schneller S, Flaker GC. Does dual chamber or atrial pacing prevent atrial fibrillation? The need for a randomized controlled trial. PACE 1992; 15: 1109–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994; 334: 1523–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luck JC, Engel TR. Dispersion of atrial refractoriness in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 1979; 60: 404–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Page PL. Sinus node during atrial fibrillation. To beat or not to beat? Circulation 1992; 86: 334–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirchhof CJ, Allessie MA. Sinus node automaticity during atrial fibrillation in isolated rabbit hearts. Circulation 1992; 86: 263–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coumel P, Friocourt P, Mugica J, Attuel P, Leclercq JF. Long-term prevention of vagal atrial arrhythmias by atrial pacing at 90/minute: experience wuth 6 cases. PACE 1983; 6: 552–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Attuel P, Pellerin D, Mugica J, Coumel P. DDD pacing: an effective treatment modality for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. PACE 1988; 11: 1647–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Murgatroyd FD, Nitzsche R, Slade AKB, Limousin M, Rosset N, Camm AJ. A new pacing algorithm for overdrive suppression of atrial fibrillation. Chorus Multicentre Study Group. PACE 1994; 17: 1966–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mond HG, Barold SS. Dual chamber, rate adaptive pacing in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: protective measures for rate control. PACE 1993; 16: 2168–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sung RJ, Styperek JL, Castellanos A. Complete abolition of the reentrant supraventricular tachycardia zone using a new modality of cardiac pacing with simultaneous atrioventricular stimulation. Am J Cardiol; 45: 72–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levy S, Berovitz BV, Broustet JP et al. Sequential double demand programmable stimulation in the treatment of resistant supra ventricular tachycardia. Long-term results. Arch. Mal. Coeur 1983; 76: 421–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spurreil RA, Sowton E. Pacing techniques in the management of supraventricular tachycardias. Part 2. An implanted atrial synchronous pacemaker with a short atrioventricular delay for the prevention of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias. J Electrocardiol 1976; 9: 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bayes de Luna A, Cladellas M, Oter R et al. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 1112–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Daubert J-C, Mabo P, Berder V, Gras D, Leclerq C. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with high degree interatrial conduction block: prevention by permanent atrial resynchronisation. Eur J C P E 1994; 4: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Daubert JC, Gras D, Leclerq C, Baisset JM, Victor F, Mabo P. Biatrial synchronous pacing: a new therapeutic approach to prevent refractory atrial arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 230A. (Abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Prakash A, Saksena S, Krol RB et al. Electrophysiology of acute prevention of atrial fibrillation and flutter with dual site atrial pacing. PACE 1995; 18.4 (Part H): 803. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prakash A, Saksena S, Hill M et al. Outcome of patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation/flutter and bradyarrhythmias using long-term dual site atrial pacing. PACE 1995; 18.4 (Part II): 809. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wittkampf FH, de Jongste MJ, Lie HI, Meijler FL. Effect of right ventricular pacing on ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 539–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lau CP, Leung WH, Wong CK, Tai YT, Cheng CH. A new pacing method for rapid regularization and rate control in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 1198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirchhof C, Chorro F, Scheffer GJ et al. Regional entrainment of atrial fibrillation studied by high-resolution mapping in open-chest dogs. Circulation 1993; 88: 736–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Garrey WE. Auricular fibrillation. Physiol Rev 1924; 4: 215–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slade, A.K.B., Camm, A.J. (1996). Pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation. In: Oto, M.A. (eds) Practice and Progress in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 183. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6582-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0219-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics