Abstract
In recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the adverse effects of atrial fibrillation. Previously considered a relatively benign arrhythmia it is now recognised to be a major cause of preventable stroke and may cause left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence of poorly controlled ventricular rate patients may experience symptoms of palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness, particularly where underlying cardiac disease renders the myocardium less compliant. This risk of stroke is not confined to subjects with rheumatic valvular heart diseases but has become well established in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. The risk of stroke is reduced but not eliminated by oral anticoagulant therapy hence the increasing interest in maintenance of sinus rhythm wherever possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alpert MA, Curtis JJ, Sanfelippo JF et al. Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 958–65.
Sutton R, Kenny RA. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. [Review]. PACE 1986; 9: 1110–4.
Markewitz A, Schad N, Hemmer W, Bernheim C, Ciavolella M, Weinhold C. What is the most appropriate stimulation mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction? PACE 1986; 9: 1115–20.
Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schuller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J 1988; 116: 16–22.
Langenfeld H, Grimm W, Maisch B, Kochsiek K. Atrial fibrillation and embolic complications in paced patients. PACE 1988; 11: 1667–72.
Feuer JM, Shandling AH, Messenger JC. Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long-term development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 1376–9.
Camm AJ, Katritsis D. Ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome — a risky business? PACE 1990; 13: 695–9.
Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, Cacciatore G, Cini R, Turitto G. Relation of pronosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 729–35.
Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo G, Cazzamalli L, Bonandi L, Dei Cas L. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 2076–79.
Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blomer H. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1990; 13: 2080–5.
Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1542–9.
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD. The role of pacing modality in determining long-term survival in the sick sinus syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 359–65.
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD et al. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation 1993; 88: 1045–53.
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Trohman RG, Castle LW, Maloney JD. Single-chamber ventricular pacing is not associated with worsening heart failure in sick sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 693–7.
Lamas G A, Estes NM, Schneller S, Flaker GC. Does dual chamber or atrial pacing prevent atrial fibrillation? The need for a randomized controlled trial. PACE 1992; 15: 1109–13.
Anderson HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994; 334: 1523–8.
Luck JC, Engel TR. Dispersion of atrial refractoriness in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 1979; 60: 404–12.
Page PL. Sinus node during atrial fibrillation. To beat or not to beat? Circulation 1992; 86: 334–6.
Kirchhof CJ, Allessie MA. Sinus node automaticity during atrial fibrillation in isolated rabbit hearts. Circulation 1992; 86: 263–71.
Coumel P, Friocourt P, Mugica J, Attuel P, Leclercq JF. Long-term prevention of vagal atrial arrhythmias by atrial pacing at 90/minute: experience wuth 6 cases. PACE 1983; 6: 552–60.
Attuel P, Pellerin D, Mugica J, Coumel P. DDD pacing: an effective treatment modality for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. PACE 1988; 11: 1647–54.
Murgatroyd FD, Nitzsche R, Slade AKB, Limousin M, Rosset N, Camm AJ. A new pacing algorithm for overdrive suppression of atrial fibrillation. Chorus Multicentre Study Group. PACE 1994; 17: 1966–73.
Mond HG, Barold SS. Dual chamber, rate adaptive pacing in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: protective measures for rate control. PACE 1993; 16: 2168–85.
Sung RJ, Styperek JL, Castellanos A. Complete abolition of the reentrant supraventricular tachycardia zone using a new modality of cardiac pacing with simultaneous atrioventricular stimulation. Am J Cardiol; 45: 72–8.
Levy S, Berovitz BV, Broustet JP et al. Sequential double demand programmable stimulation in the treatment of resistant supra ventricular tachycardia. Long-term results. Arch. Mal. Coeur 1983; 76: 421–9.
Spurreil RA, Sowton E. Pacing techniques in the management of supraventricular tachycardias. Part 2. An implanted atrial synchronous pacemaker with a short atrioventricular delay for the prevention of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias. J Electrocardiol 1976; 9: 89–96.
Bayes de Luna A, Cladellas M, Oter R et al. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 1112–8.
Daubert J-C, Mabo P, Berder V, Gras D, Leclerq C. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with high degree interatrial conduction block: prevention by permanent atrial resynchronisation. Eur J C P E 1994; 4: 35–44.
Daubert JC, Gras D, Leclerq C, Baisset JM, Victor F, Mabo P. Biatrial synchronous pacing: a new therapeutic approach to prevent refractory atrial arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 230A. (Abstract).
Prakash A, Saksena S, Krol RB et al. Electrophysiology of acute prevention of atrial fibrillation and flutter with dual site atrial pacing. PACE 1995; 18.4 (Part H): 803. (Abstract).
Prakash A, Saksena S, Hill M et al. Outcome of patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation/flutter and bradyarrhythmias using long-term dual site atrial pacing. PACE 1995; 18.4 (Part II): 809. (Abstract).
Wittkampf FH, de Jongste MJ, Lie HI, Meijler FL. Effect of right ventricular pacing on ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 539–45.
Lau CP, Leung WH, Wong CK, Tai YT, Cheng CH. A new pacing method for rapid regularization and rate control in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 1198–203.
Kirchhof C, Chorro F, Scheffer GJ et al. Regional entrainment of atrial fibrillation studied by high-resolution mapping in open-chest dogs. Circulation 1993; 88: 736–49.
Garrey WE. Auricular fibrillation. Physiol Rev 1924; 4: 215–50.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slade, A.K.B., Camm, A.J. (1996). Pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation. In: Oto, M.A. (eds) Practice and Progress in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 183. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6582-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0219-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive