Abstract
Historically, the US cord of assimilating differences occurred through stratifying and also harboring economic and political power resulting in the marginalization of certain segments of the population. Consequently, marginalized groups were left with the challenge of sustaining their lives in an environment where declared norms isolated and devalued them and their cultures. Messages of inferiority surfaced and were reinforced in stereotypes depicting these groups in a negative light, which further disadvantaged them. To achieve in spite of the difficulties, individuals belonging to these marginalized groups must overcome the social constraints imposed upon their identities, which is dependent upon the resources that are available to them. This is especially true for students. Their lack of identity with the significant images represented in the curriculum such as science can influence their thoughts about their value and their potential to achieve and make a contribution. The nature of this conflict must be understood in terms of its history and impact on society and schooling which is defined as sociocultural consciousness. Sociocultural consciousness is the crux of culturally responsive pedagogy which takes into account the diverse needs of students as influenced by culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.
Apple, M. W. (1978). Ideology, reproduction, and educational reform. Comparative Education Review, 22(3), 367–387.
Apple, M. W. (1986). Ideology and Curriculum (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Atwater, M., & Riley, P. (1993). Multicultural science education: Perspectives, definitions, and research agenda. Science Education, 77, 661–668.
Banks, J. (2010). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. Banks & C. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4, 77–85.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Brand, B., Glasson, G., & Green, A. (2006). Sociocultural factors influencing students’ learning in science and mathematics: An analysis of the perspectives of African American students. School Science and Mathematics, 106(5), 228–236.
Chubbuck, S. M. (2010). Individual and structural orientations in socially just teaching: Conceptualization, implementation, and collaborative effort. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 197–210.
Clark, K., & Clark, M. (1939). Development of consciousness of self and the racial identification in Negro preschool children. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 591–599.
Davis, K. (Director). (2005). A girl like me [Documentary]. United States. Retrieved from http://www.kiridavis.com/
Ferguson, R., Gever, M., Minh-ha, T. T., & West, C. (1990). Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures. New York, NY: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257–293.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Curriculum, multiculturalism, and the politics of identity. NASSP Bulletin, 76(548), 1–11.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). Critical pedagogy primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Kohl, H. (1992). I won’t learn from you! Thoughts on the role of assent in learning. Rethinking schools 7(1), 16–17, 19.
Kohl, H. (1995). “I won’t learn from you”: And other thoughts on creative maladjustment. New York, NY: New Press.
McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1347–1389.
Sleeter, C. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 7–23.
Tobias, S. (1988). Insiders and outsiders. Academic Connections, 1–5.
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.
Yee, A. H. (1992). Asians as stereotypes and students: Misperceptions that persist. Educational Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brand, B. (2014). Sociocultural Consciousness and Science Teacher Education. In: Atwater, M., Russell, M., Butler, M. (eds) Multicultural Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7651-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7651-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7650-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7651-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)