Abstract
The public educational system in Norway can be characterised by the equal right for every child to have an education of equal quality in a common school for all pupils regardless of social background, abilities, gender or ethnic background. This system has played a long and important role in Norway’s development from a relatively poor country at the beginning of the twentieth century to one of the world’s richest and most developed welfare state systems today. However, growing international influence on education policy, neoliberalism and growth of individualistic attitudes in public thought around the millennium have altered the conditions for this enduring education system, causing widespread concern that the fundamental values underpinning this system have been undermined. This chapter discusses how new management systems in education may challenge the traditional ideal of ‘a school for all’ and what empirical research says about the matter.
The chapter presents a brief history of how the Norwegian school system has developed since the eighteenth century and how the new transnational policies were introduced in Norway after the millennium. Recent evidence shows that there is greater bureaucracy and paperwork in schools, more concern about test-based results and performance-based educational quality indicators than broader educational aims, increasing differences between districts and schools and between social groups and gender. The traditional balance between community and individualism is being upset by the dominance of the latter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Norway was in union with Denmark from 1537 until 1814 and was in practice subordinated the Danish Crown. However, from 1660 onwards, the twin kingdoms had their own separate laws, militaries and systems of finance.
- 2.
Source: KOSTRA, an online register system for Norwegian municipalities and counties.
References
Ahonen, S., et al. (2001). The end of the common school? Change in the ethos and politics of education in Finland towards the end of the 1990s. In L. Rantala & L. Rantala (Eds.), Nordic lights. Education for nation and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850–2000 (pp. 175–203). Helsinki: Tammer-Paino Oy.
Bachmann, K., & Haug, P. (2006). Forskning om tilpasset opplæring [Research on adapted Teaching]. Høgskulen i Volda og Møreforskning Volda, rapport 62/2006.
Bachmann, K., Haug, P., & Myklebust, R. (2010). Med rett til å prestere [With a right to achieve]. In E. Elstad & K. Sivesind (Eds.), PISA – sannheten om skolen? [PISA – The truth about schools?] (pp. 298–317). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Bull, I. (2011). Industriousness and development of the school-system in the eighteenth century: The experience of Norwegian cities. History of Education, 40(4), 1–22.
Dahl, M., & Midtbø, R. (2006). Nytt perspektiv på tilpasset opplæring. Intervju med Peder Haug [A new perspective on adapted teaching]. Bedre skole, 2, 30–33.
Fjeldstad, D., Lauglo, J., & Mikkelsen, R. (2010). Demokratisk beredskap. Kortrapport om norske ungdomsskoleelevers prestasjoner og svar på spørsmål i den internasjonale demokratiundersøkelsen [Democratic preparedness. Short report on Norwegian 13–16 aged students’ achievements and answers to questions in the international democracy investigation]. International Civic and Citizen Education Study (ICCS 2009). Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, ILS.
Fladmoe, A. (2012). Education in the news and in the mind: PISA, news media and public opinion in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Nordicom Review, 33(1), 99–116.
Grønmo, L. S., & Onstad, T. (2009). Tegn til bedring. Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk og naturfag i TIMSS 2007 [Signs to improvement. Norwegian students’ achievements in mathematics and science]. Oslo: Unipub.
Hægeland, T., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2007). Skoleresultater 2006. En kartlegging av karakterer fra grunn- og videregående skoler i Norge (Notater 2007/29) [School results 2006. A report on marks from lower and upper secondary school]. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway].
Imsen, G. (2003). Skolemiljø, læringsmiljø og elevutbytte. En empirisk studie av grunnskolens 4., 7. og 10. trinn [School environment, learning environment, and students’ outcomes. An empirical Investigation of Level 4., 7., and 10 in Norwegian comprehensive schools]. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
Karlsen, G. (2002). Utdanning, styring og marked [Education, government and the economy market]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet. (1989). OECD-vurdering av norsk utdanningspolitikk [OECD investigation of Norwegian educational policy]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
Kjærnsli, M., & Roe, A. (red.). (2010). På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Kjærnsli, M., et al. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier? Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk, naturfag og lesing i PISA 2003 [Right track or wild roads? Norwegian students’ achievements in mathematics, science, and reading in PISA 2003]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Kjærnsli, M., et al. (2007). Tid for tunge løft. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006 [Time for heavy Lifts. Norwegian students’ competence in science, reading, and mathematics in PISA 2006]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Klette, K. (2003). Lærernes klasseromsarbeid: Interaksjons- og arbeidsformer i norske klasserom etter Reform 97 [Teachers’ classroom work: Interaction and working patterns in Norwegian classrooms after Reform 97]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 [Working patterns in classrooms after Reform 97] (pp. 39–76). Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2009). Rapport fra tidsbrukutvalget [Time-use committee report]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen (L97) [National Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary School] (1996). Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet (LK06) [National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training]. (2006). Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Meld. St. 19 (2009–2010). Tid til læring – oppfølging av Tidsbrukutvalgets rapport [Time to learn – Follow-up of the time committee report]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Mikkelsen, R., Buk-Berge, E., Ellingsen, H., Fjeldstad, D., & Sund, A. (2001). Demokratisk beredskap og engasjement hos 9. klassinger i Norge og 27 andre land. Civic Education Study Norge 2001 [Democratic preparedness and involvement among 9th graders in Norway and 27 other countries. Civic Education Study Norway 2001]. Acta Didactica,3 1.
Møller, J., et al. (2006). Skolelederundersøkelsen 2005. Om arbeidsforhold, evalueringspraksis og ledelse i skolen (Report) [The school leader investigation 2005. On working conditions, evaluation practice, and leadership in schools]. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling.
Mortimore, P., et al. (2004). Equity in education: Thematic review. Paris: OECD.
Nicolaisen, H., Nyen, T., & Olberg, D. (2005). Lærernes arbeidstid. Evaluering av avtale om arbeidstid for undervisningspersonalet i skoleverket 2004–2006. Fafo-rapport 508. [Teachers’ working time. Evaluation of agreement on working time for school teachers 2004–2006]. Oslo: Fafo.
Nordahl, T. (2000). Samarbeid mellom skole og hjem – en kartleggingsundersøkelse (NOVA Rapport 8/2000) [Home – School cooperation – A survey].
Nordahl, T. (2004). Makt og avmakt i samarbeidet mellom hjem og skole [Power and powerlessness in home – school cooperation]. In G. Imsen (Ed.), Det ustyrlige klasserommet. Om styring, samarbeid og læringsmiljø i grunnskolen [The unruly classroom. On management, cooperation and learning environment in comprehensive school.) (pp. 221–236). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Olsen, R. V. (2010). Matematikk i PISA [Mathematics in PISA]. In M. Kjærnsli & A. Roe (Ed.), På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right Track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009] (pp. 138–158). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Olsen, R. V., & Turmo, A. (2010). Et likeverdig skoletilbud? In M. Kjærnsli and A. Roe (Ed.), På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009] (pp. 207–225). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Opheim, V. (2004). Equity in education. Country Analytical Report Norway. Oslo: NIFU STEP rapport 7/2004.
Rønning, M. (2010). Homework and pupil achievement in Norway. Evidence from TIMSS (Reports 1/2010). Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå.
Slagstad, R. (1998). De nasjonale strateger [The national strategists]. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.
St.meld.nr. 16. (2006–2007). …og ingen stod igjen og hang. Tidlig innsats for livslang læring [… and no one was left behind. Early Intervention for Lifelong Learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
St.meld. nr 30. (2003–2004). Kultur for læring [Culture for learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
St.meld.nr. 37. (1990–91). Om organisering og styring i utdanningssektoren [On the organisation and management in the education sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Stray, J. H. (2010). Demokratisk medborgerskap i norsk skole? En kritisk analyse [Democratic citizenship in Norwegian schools? A critical analysis]. Ph.D. dissertation. Pedagogisk forkningsinstitutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo.
Strøm, B., Borge, L.-E., & Haugsbakken, H. (2009). Tidsbruk og organisering i grunnskolen: Sluttrapport (SØF-rapport nr. 04/09) [Time spending and organisation in comprehensive schools]. Trondheim: Senter for økonomisk forskning.
Telhaug, A. O. (1994). Utdanningspolitikken og enhetsskolen [Education policy and the unified comprehensive school]. Oslo: Didakta.
Telhaug, A. O., & Mediås, O. A. (2003). Grunnskolen som nasjonsbygger. Fra statspietisme til nyliberalisme [Compulsory school as a nation builder. From state pietism to new liberalism]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2010). The Education Mirror 2009. Analysis of primary and secondary education and training in Norway. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and training.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Karakterer for grunnskolen 2009–2010 [Marks in the comprehensive school 2009–2010]. http://www.udir.no/Tilstand/Analyser-og-statistikk/Grunnskolen/Karakterer---grunnskolen/Karakterer-for-grunnskolen-2009-2010/. Retrieved 27 Aug 2011.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Utdanningsspeilet 2011. Tall og analyse av grunnopplæringen i Norge [The Education Mirror 2011. Numbers and analysis of Norwegian comprehensive education].
Vangsnes, S. (1967). Rekruttering av artianere og karakterer til examen artium. En undersøkelse av fire artiumskull [Recruitment and marks from upper secondary school. An investigation of four cohorts]. Oslo: Norges allmenvitenskapelige forskningsråd. Utredninger om forskning og høyere utdanning. Melding nr. 1.
Volckmar, N. (2005). Fra solidarisk samværskultur til kunnskapssolidaritet. Det sosialdemokratiske skoleprosjekt fra Sivertsen til Hernes [From solidary public spirit to knowledge solidarity. The social-democratic school project from Sivertsen to Hernes]. Doctoral thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim.
Volckmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and solidarity: The Norwegian social-democratic school project in a period of change, 1945–2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 1–15.
Volckmar, N. (2010). En skole for alle”og privatisering – en analyse av de skandinaviske landenes privatiseringspolitikk [«A school for all» and privatisation – An investigation of privatisation in Scandinavian education policy]. Uddannelseshistorie 2010. Fellesskab og elite: Skolen mellem det offentlige og private. 44. Årbog (s. 33–49). Århus: Selskabet for Skole- og Uddannelseshistorie.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Imsen, G., Volckmar, N. (2014). The Norwegian School for All: Historical Emergence and Neoliberal Confrontation. In: Blossing, U., Imsen, G., Moos, L. (eds) The Nordic Education Model. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7124-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7125-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)