Skip to main content

The Norwegian School for All: Historical Emergence and Neoliberal Confrontation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nordic Education Model

Part of the book series: Policy Implications of Research in Education ((PIRE,volume 1))

Abstract

The public educational system in Norway can be characterised by the equal right for every child to have an education of equal quality in a common school for all pupils regardless of social background, abilities, gender or ethnic background. This system has played a long and important role in Norway’s development from a relatively poor country at the beginning of the twentieth century to one of the world’s richest and most developed welfare state systems today. However, growing international influence on education policy, neoliberalism and growth of individualistic attitudes in public thought around the millennium have altered the conditions for this enduring education system, causing widespread concern that the fundamental values underpinning this system have been undermined. This chapter discusses how new management systems in education may challenge the traditional ideal of ‘a school for all’ and what empirical research says about the matter.

The chapter presents a brief history of how the Norwegian school system has developed since the eighteenth century and how the new transnational policies were introduced in Norway after the millennium. Recent evidence shows that there is greater bureaucracy and paperwork in schools, more concern about test-based results and performance-based educational quality indicators than broader educational aims, increasing differences between districts and schools and between social groups and gender. The traditional balance between community and individualism is being upset by the dominance of the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Norway was in union with Denmark from 1537 until 1814 and was in practice subordinated the Danish Crown. However, from 1660 onwards, the twin kingdoms had their own separate laws, militaries and systems of finance.

  2. 2.

    Source: KOSTRA, an online register system for Norwegian municipalities and counties.

References

  • Ahonen, S., et al. (2001). The end of the common school? Change in the ethos and politics of education in Finland towards the end of the 1990s. In L. Rantala & L. Rantala (Eds.), Nordic lights. Education for nation and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850–2000 (pp. 175–203). Helsinki: Tammer-Paino Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, K., & Haug, P. (2006). Forskning om tilpasset opplæring [Research on adapted Teaching]. Høgskulen i Volda og Møreforskning Volda, rapport 62/2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, K., Haug, P., & Myklebust, R. (2010). Med rett til å prestere [With a right to achieve]. In E. Elstad & K. Sivesind (Eds.), PISA – sannheten om skolen? [PISA – The truth about schools?] (pp. 298–317). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I. (2011). Industriousness and development of the school-system in the eighteenth century: The experience of Norwegian cities. History of Education, 40(4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, M., & Midtbø, R. (2006). Nytt perspektiv på tilpasset opplæring. Intervju med Peder Haug [A new perspective on adapted teaching]. Bedre skole, 2, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldstad, D., Lauglo, J., & Mikkelsen, R. (2010). Demokratisk beredskap. Kortrapport om norske ungdomsskoleelevers prestasjoner og svar på spørsmål i den internasjonale demokratiundersøkelsen [Democratic preparedness. Short report on Norwegian 13–16 aged students’ achievements and answers to questions in the international democracy investigation]. International Civic and Citizen Education Study (ICCS 2009). Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, ILS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fladmoe, A. (2012). Education in the news and in the mind: PISA, news media and public opinion in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Nordicom Review, 33(1), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønmo, L. S., & Onstad, T. (2009). Tegn til bedring. Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk og naturfag i TIMSS 2007 [Signs to improvement. Norwegian students’ achievements in mathematics and science]. Oslo: Unipub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hægeland, T., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2007). Skoleresultater 2006. En kartlegging av karakterer fra grunn- og videregående skoler i Norge (Notater 2007/29) [School results 2006. A report on marks from lower and upper secondary school]. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway].

    Google Scholar 

  • Imsen, G. (2003). Skolemiljø, læringsmiljø og elevutbytte. En empirisk studie av grunnskolens 4., 7. og 10. trinn [School environment, learning environment, and students’ outcomes. An empirical Investigation of Level 4., 7., and 10 in Norwegian comprehensive schools]. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, G. (2002). Utdanning, styring og marked [Education, government and the economy market]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet. (1989). OECD-vurdering av norsk utdanningspolitikk [OECD investigation of Norwegian educational policy]. Oslo: Aschehoug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnsli, M., & Roe, A. (red.). (2010). På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnsli, M., et al. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier? Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk, naturfag og lesing i PISA 2003 [Right track or wild roads? Norwegian students’ achievements in mathematics, science, and reading in PISA 2003]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnsli, M., et al. (2007). Tid for tunge løft. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006 [Time for heavy Lifts. Norwegian students’ competence in science, reading, and mathematics in PISA 2006]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette, K. (2003). Lærernes klasseromsarbeid: Interaksjons- og arbeidsformer i norske klasserom etter Reform 97 [Teachers’ classroom work: Interaction and working patterns in Norwegian classrooms after Reform 97]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 [Working patterns in classrooms after Reform 97] (pp. 39–76). Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2009). Rapport fra tidsbrukutvalget [Time-use committee report]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen (L97) [National Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary School] (1996). Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet (LK06) [National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training]. (2006). Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meld. St. 19 (2009–2010). Tid til læring – oppfølging av Tidsbrukutvalgets rapport [Time to learn – Follow-up of the time committee report]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, R., Buk-Berge, E., Ellingsen, H., Fjeldstad, D., & Sund, A. (2001). Demokratisk beredskap og engasjement hos 9. klassinger i Norge og 27 andre land. Civic Education Study Norge 2001 [Democratic preparedness and involvement among 9th graders in Norway and 27 other countries. Civic Education Study Norway 2001]. Acta Didactica,3 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J., et al. (2006). Skolelederundersøkelsen 2005. Om arbeidsforhold, evalueringspraksis og ledelse i skolen (Report) [The school leader investigation 2005. On working conditions, evaluation practice, and leadership in schools]. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., et al. (2004). Equity in education: Thematic review. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen, H., Nyen, T., & Olberg, D. (2005). Lærernes arbeidstid. Evaluering av avtale om arbeidstid for undervisningspersonalet i skoleverket 2004–2006. Fafo-rapport 508. [Teachers’ working time. Evaluation of agreement on working time for school teachers 2004–2006]. Oslo: Fafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordahl, T. (2000). Samarbeid mellom skole og hjem – en kartleggingsundersøkelse (NOVA Rapport 8/2000) [Home – School cooperation – A survey].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordahl, T. (2004). Makt og avmakt i samarbeidet mellom hjem og skole [Power and powerlessness in home – school cooperation]. In G. Imsen (Ed.), Det ustyrlige klasserommet. Om styring, samarbeid og læringsmiljø i grunnskolen [The unruly classroom. On management, cooperation and learning environment in comprehensive school.) (pp. 221–236). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. V. (2010). Matematikk i PISA [Mathematics in PISA]. In M. Kjærnsli & A. Roe (Ed.), På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right Track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009] (pp. 138–158). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. V., & Turmo, A. (2010). Et likeverdig skoletilbud? In M. Kjærnsli and A. Roe (Ed.), På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right track. Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics, and science in PISA 2009] (pp. 207–225). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opheim, V. (2004). Equity in education. Country Analytical Report Norway. Oslo: NIFU STEP rapport 7/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rønning, M. (2010). Homework and pupil achievement in Norway. Evidence from TIMSS (Reports 1/2010). Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagstad, R. (1998). De nasjonale strateger [The national strategists]. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.meld.nr. 16. (2006–2007). …og ingen stod igjen og hang. Tidlig innsats for livslang læring [… and no one was left behind. Early Intervention for Lifelong Learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.meld. nr 30. (2003–2004). Kultur for læring [Culture for learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.meld.nr. 37. (1990–91). Om organisering og styring i utdanningssektoren [On the organisation and management in the education sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stray, J. H. (2010). Demokratisk medborgerskap i norsk skole? En kritisk analyse [Democratic citizenship in Norwegian schools? A critical analysis]. Ph.D. dissertation. Pedagogisk forkningsinstitutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, B., Borge, L.-E., & Haugsbakken, H. (2009). Tidsbruk og organisering i grunnskolen: Sluttrapport (SØF-rapport nr. 04/09) [Time spending and organisation in comprehensive schools]. Trondheim: Senter for økonomisk forskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telhaug, A. O. (1994). Utdanningspolitikken og enhetsskolen [Education policy and the unified comprehensive school]. Oslo: Didakta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telhaug, A. O., & Mediås, O. A. (2003). Grunnskolen som nasjonsbygger. Fra statspietisme til nyliberalisme [Compulsory school as a nation builder. From state pietism to new liberalism]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2010). The Education Mirror 2009. Analysis of primary and secondary education and training in Norway. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Karakterer for grunnskolen 2009–2010 [Marks in the comprehensive school 2009–2010]. http://www.udir.no/Tilstand/Analyser-og-statistikk/Grunnskolen/Karakterer---grunnskolen/Karakterer-for-grunnskolen-2009-2010/. Retrieved 27 Aug 2011.

  • Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Utdanningsspeilet 2011. Tall og analyse av grunnopplæringen i Norge [The Education Mirror 2011. Numbers and analysis of Norwegian comprehensive education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangsnes, S. (1967). Rekruttering av artianere og karakterer til examen artium. En undersøkelse av fire artiumskull [Recruitment and marks from upper secondary school. An investigation of four cohorts]. Oslo: Norges allmenvitenskapelige forskningsråd. Utredninger om forskning og høyere utdanning. Melding nr. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volckmar, N. (2005). Fra solidarisk samværskultur til kunnskapssolidaritet. Det sosialdemokratiske skoleprosjekt fra Sivertsen til Hernes [From solidary public spirit to knowledge solidarity. The social-democratic school project from Sivertsen to Hernes]. Doctoral thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volckmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and solidarity: The Norwegian social-democratic school project in a period of change, 1945–2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volckmar, N. (2010). En skole for alle”og privatisering – en analyse av de skandinaviske landenes privatiseringspolitikk [«A school for all» and privatisation – An investigation of privatisation in Scandinavian education policy]. Uddannelseshistorie 2010. Fellesskab og elite: Skolen mellem det offentlige og private. 44. Årbog (s. 33–49). Århus: Selskabet for Skole- og Uddannelseshistorie.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunn Imsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Imsen, G., Volckmar, N. (2014). The Norwegian School for All: Historical Emergence and Neoliberal Confrontation. In: Blossing, U., Imsen, G., Moos, L. (eds) The Nordic Education Model. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics