Abstract
Wood, either as a fuel or as an industrial product, is and always has been one of the world’s most important raw materials. However, wood is almost always ignored in any evaluation of global resources. More wood is used globally than wheat, maize or rice for instance.
In 2010 the world harvested just over twice as much wood as it did in 1920. However, over those 90 years the global population has increased almost fourfold so the per capita wood consumption has almost halved This is despite wood being both renewable and sustainable as well as requiring little energy for its conversion into products.
In spite an over a century of predictions of a global wood famine, the world’s supply of wood has increased and could even be slightly increased further.
Tree growing requires at least 20–30 years before they are large enough to be harvested. We can only return to the per capita consumption levels of 1920s if there is a huge investment (many tens or even hundreds) of billions of dollars, even without allowing for compound interest) in plantations of fast growing tree species. Only pension funds and large companies have the scale as well as both the vision and the financial resources to invest in such a long term, capital intensive industry as forestry.
The well meaning global environmental movement is often opposed to forest harvesting, even where the forests are responsibly managed. This is a totally misguided belief as trees are living organisms. Locking up forests and preventing forest management is a sure way of ensuring forests will eventually collapse (often with tragic consequences – e. g. a major fire). All forests are very capable of recovering from a catastrophic disaster (forest clearance, mega-fire, volcanic eruption, etc.). If forest preservation is the objective, the best means of achieving this is with responsible management and tree harvesting. Many environmentalists also are opposed to plantations, especially those of introduced tree species, but these can be very productive and unlike natural forests are likely to attract funding and be self-financing thereafter.
Forest harvesting is often portrayed as deforestation, but we have the apparent paradox that those countries with the greatest wood harvest also have the least deforestation (Europe and North America).
Is there any product that is more renewable, more sustainable, and more environmentally friendly, than wood?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anon (1987) The great burn – up from the ashes of 1910. Montana Magazine October 1987, pp 72–76
Burch G, Walker A, Robson PA (1995) The working forest of British Columbia – the working forest project. Harbour Publishing, Columbia
Carle J, Holmgren P (2008) Wood from planted forest – a global outlook 2005–2030. For Prod J 58(12):5–18
Clepper H (1967) Tree farming in America. Unasylva 85:9–16
Evans J (1999) Sustainability of forest plantations – the evidence. Report commissioned by the Department for International Development. London
FAO (1997) Global forest resources 2000…. Chapter 43 Tropical South America Page 3 of the internet download
Fenton R (1970) Criteria for production forestry. NZ J For 15(2):150–157
Gilding P (2011) The great disruption: why the climate crisis will bring on the end of shopping and the birth of a new world. Bloomsbury Press, New York
Heinberg H (2010) Peak everything: waking up to the century of decline. New Society Publishers. P. O. Box189, Gabriola Island, BC V0R 1X0, Canada, p 240
Ince P (2010) Global sustainable timber supply and demand – chapter 2, pp 29–41 in Sustainable Development in the Forest Products Industry (sourced via the internet)
Jones EW (1945) The structure and reproduction of the virgin forest of the North Temperate Zone. New Phytol 44(2):130–148
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behram WW III (1972) The limits to growth. A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York, p 205
Raup DM (1991) Extinction – bad genes or bad luck? W. W Norton & Company Inc., Pennsylvania, p 210
Ritter MA, Skeg K, Bergman R (2011) Science supporting the economic and environmental benefits of using wood in green building construction. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Lab. General Technical Report FPL – GTR – 206, p 18
Sutton WRJ (2010) Wood – the world’s most sustainable raw material. NZ J For 55(1):22–26
Turner JA, Boungiorno J, Maplesden F, Zhu S, Bates S, Li R (2006) World wood industries outlook 2005–2030. Forest Res Bull 230, Scion, Rotorua, New Zealand
Zon R, Sparhawk WN (1923) Forest resources of the world. McGraw Hill, New Jersey
References and Further Reading
A large number of references were used in the preparation of this chapter. Where the material came from published sources and these are usually quoted below. However some material, especially that “published” since 1995, was sourced via the internet. For example, internet sources supplied almost all the information used in the three examples of forest recovery following a catastrophic event. None of those information sources are referenced. Websites are often changed or simply disappear. Far better to “google” key words. Where possible, data came from authoritative sources (often by the internet) – FAO, Trade organizations, Governments, etc
Acknowledgements
The writer is indebted to Dr Trevor Fenning and Dr David South for their comments on the initial draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutton, W.R.J.“. (2014). Save the Forests: Use More Wood. In: Fenning, T. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century. Forestry Sciences, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7075-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7076-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)