Skip to main content

A Simplex-Crossover-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
IAENG Transactions on Engineering Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 247))

Abstract

The key issue for an efficient and reliable multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is the ability to converge to the True Pareto Front with the least number of objective function evaluations, while covering it as much as possible. To this purpose, in a previous paper performance comparisons showed that the Genetic Diversity Evolutionary Algorithm (GeDEA) was at the same level of the best state-of-the-art MOEAs due to it intrinsic ability to properly conjugate exploitation of current non-dominated solutions and the exploration of the search space. In this paper, an improved version, namely the GeDEA-II, is proposed which features a novel crossover operator, the Simplex-Crossover, and a novel mutation operator, the Shrink-Mutation. GeDEM operator was left unchanged and completed using the non-dominated-sorting based on crowding distance. The comparison among GeDEA-II and GeDEA, as well as with three other modern elitist methods, on different extremely multidimensional test problems, clearly indicates that the performance of GeDEA-II is, at least in these cases, superior. In addition, authors aimed at putting in evidence the very good performance of GeDEA-II even in extremely multidimensional landscapes. To do this, four test problems were considered, and the GeDEA-II performance tested as the number of decision variables was increased. In particular, ZDT test functions featured a number of decision variables ranging from the original proposed number up to 1,000, whereas on DTLZ the decision variables were increased up to 100 times the original proposed number. Results obtained contribute to demonstrate further the GeDEA-II breakthrough performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This software is available for public use at PISA website http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/pisa/.

  2. 2.

    The Hypervolume is a Pareto compliant indicator as stated in [5].

References

  1. Bhusan Agrawal R, Deb K (1994) Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Sys 9:115–148

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bäck T (1996) Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bäck T, Schwefel H-P (1993) An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evol Comput 1(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleuler S, Laumanns M, Thiele L, Zitzler E (2002) PISA–a platform and programming language independent interface for search algorithms. Springer, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coello Coello CA, Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Comis Da Ronco C, Benini E (2012) Gedea-II: a novel evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems based on the simplex crossover and the shrink mutation. In: Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science (2012) WCECS 2012, 24–26 Oct 2012. USA, San Francisco, pp 1298–1303

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deb K (1999) Multi-objective genetic algorithms: problem difficulties and construction of test problems. Evol Comput 7(3):205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Zitzler E (2001) Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), TIK-Technical Report No. 112, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fogel DB (1995) Evolutionary computation: toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fonseca CM, Paquete L, López-Ibáñez M (2006) An improved dimension-sweep algorithm for the hypervolume indicator. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1157–1163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghiasi Hossein, Pasini Damiano, Lessard Larry (2011) A non-dominated sorting hybrid algorithm for multi-objective optimization of engineering problems. Eng Optim 43(1):39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koduru P, Dong Z, Das S, Welch S, Roe JL, Charbit E (2008) A multiobjective evolutionary-simplex hybrid approach for the optimization of differential equation models of gene networks. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(5):572–590

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laumanns M, Zitzler E, Thiele L (2001) On the effects of archiving, elitism, and density based selection in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp 181–196

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nelder JM, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Toffolo A, Benini E (2002) Genetic diversity as an objective in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Evol Comput 11(2):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsutsui S, Yamamura M, Higuchi T (1999) Multi-parent recombination with simplex crossover in real coded genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the GECCO-99, pp 657–644

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 8(2):173–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzler E, Künzli S et al (2004) Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In: Yao X (ed) Parallel problem solving from nature (PPSN VIII). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 832–842

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Technical report 103, computer engineering and networks laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, May 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Benini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Da Ronco, C., Benini, E. (2014). A Simplex-Crossover-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Kim, H., Ao, SI., Amouzegar, M., Rieger, B. (eds) IAENG Transactions on Engineering Technologies. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6818-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6818-5_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6817-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6818-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics