Abstract
Calls for the development of evidence-based policy and practice in education raise many questions about the nature of evidence and the relationship between research, policy, practice, and the democratic process. The logic of proponents seems to be that the best evidence of ‘what works’ needs to be produced by research, and in particular by large scale quantitative and experimental approaches to research which, the critics have claimed, are not widely undertaken by educational researchers. Having been produced, such evidence should then be translated into policy; and practice must follow policy, in a classic centre-periphery, Research, Development, Dissemination (RDD) model of social and institutional change. Such a model privileges research evidence over the democratic process. However philosophical critiques of the logic and implications of the evidence movement are insufficient. Educational researchers must draw attention to its weaknesses in methodology, and seek to address the democratic deficit by linking research methods to stakeholder engagement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baez B, Boyles D (2009) The politics of inquiry: education research and the ‘culture of science’. State University of New York Press, Albany
Barbour R, Barbour M (2003) Evaluating and synthesising qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract 9(2):179–185
Blunkett D (2000). Influence or Irrelevance: can social science improve government? Speech to ESRC, reprinted in Research Intelligence, British Educational Research Association, No.71. 2 February, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, online at: http://www.bera.ac.uk/system/files/BERARI071.pdf
Cook T, Payne M (2002) Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In: Mosteller F, Boruch R (eds) Evidence matters: randomized trials in education research. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 150–178
Cronbach LJ (1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 30:116–127
Cronbach LJ et al (1980) Toward reform of program evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Department for Business, Innovations and Skills (2009) Higher ambitions: the future of universities in a knowledge economy. http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/higher-ambitions. Accessed 11 Dec 2009
Gorard S (with Taylor C.) (2004) Combining methods in educational and social research. Open University Press, Maidenhead
Greenberg D (2001) Science, money and politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Guba E, Lincoln Y (1981) Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Hamilton D, Jenkins D, King C, MacDonald B, Parlett M (1976) Beyond the numbers game. Macmillan, London
Hammersley M (1997) Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA Lecture. Br Educ Res J 23(2):141–161
Hammersley M (2001) On systematic reviews of research literature: a narrative response. Br Educ Res J 27(4):543–554
Hammersley M (2005) The myth of research-based practice: the critical case of educational inquiry. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(4):317–330
Hargreaves D (1996) Teaching as a research based profession. TTA Annual Lecture. TTA, London
House E, Howe K (1999) Values in evaluation and social research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
MacDonald B (1974) Evaluation and the control of education. Reprinted in Murphy R, Torrance H (eds.) (1987). Evaluating education: issues and methods. Harper & Row, London
MacLure M (2003) Discourse in education and social research. Open University Press, Maidenhead
MacLure M (2005) ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: where’s the quality in systematic review? J Educ Policy 20(4):393–416
Mosteller F, Boruch R (eds) (2002) Evidence matters: randomized trials in education research. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
No Child Left Behind Act (2001) Public Law No. 107–110. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Simons H (1987) Getting to know schools in a democracy: the politics and process of evaluation. Falmer Press, London
Slavin R (2002) Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ Res 31(7):15–21
Stake R (1967) The countenance of educational evaluation. Teach Coll Rec 68:523–540
Stake R (1978) The case study method in social inquiry. Educ Res 7(2):5–8
Stenhouse L (1975) An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinneman, London
Tooley J, Darby D (1998) Educational research: a critique. OfSTED, London
Torrance H (2008) Overview of ESRC Research in Education: a consultancy commissioned by ESRC: Final report. http://www.sfre.ac.uk/uk/
Torrance H (2011) Qualitative research, science and government: evidence, criteria, policy and politics. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Viadero D (2009, March 31) ‘No effects’ studies raising eyebrows. Education Week 28(1):14–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torrance, H. (2014). Philosophy Is Not Enough: Inserting Methodology and Politics into the Space Between Science and Democracy. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6808-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6809-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)