Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Biopolitics of Cognitive Enhancement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Enhancement

Part of the book series: Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance ((TAHP,volume 1))

Abstract

The ongoing discussion regarding the propriety of cognitive enhancement is, at its core, biopolitical. In an attempt to understand the underlying issues, it is instructive to view the subject through the perspectives of those at the extremes – the Transhumanists who enthusiastically support the development of cognitive enhancement and the Bioconservatives who view the enterprise with disapprobation. I argue that many of the positions undertaken by proponents of either view are influenced to a considerable degree by a variety of pre-existing political positions as much as, if not more so than, by deeper philosophical reflection, a phenomenon very much in keeping with Jonathan Haidt’s social intuitionist model of moral reasoning (Haidt, Psychol Rev 108:814–834, 2001). Despite the vocal nature of the extremes, there also exists a broad middle ground which I term The view from reasonableness which is much less of a polemic and more of a conversation. Given that the ultimate outcome rests more on how the populace responds than the views of experts, I suggest that supplementing normative claims driven by biopolitical intuitions with empirical data on public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement might allow us to move beyond polemics to deepen our appreciation of how to move forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agar N (2007) Whereto Transhumanism? The literature reaches a critical mass. Hastings Cent Rep 37:12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baily D, Sandberg A, Alves G, More M, Wagner H, Vita-More N, Leitl E, Staring B, Pearce D, Fantegrossi B et al (1998) Transhumanist declaration. http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/

  • Baker S (2009) Building a better brain. Discover 30:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt I, Schermer M (2009) Psychopharmaceutical enhancers: enhancing identity? Neuroethics 2:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N, Ord T (2006) The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. Ethics 116:656–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N, Sandberg A (2009) Cognitive enhancement: methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Sci Eng Ethics 15:311–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio J (2009) Get smarter. Atlantic 304:94–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A (2004) Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology 63:968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25:228–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erler A (2011) Does memory modification threaten our authenticity? Neuroethics 4:235–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan RM, Gardner H, Kandel ER, King P, Parens E, Sahakian B, Wolpe PR (2004) Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 5:421–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faust H (2008) Should we select for genetic moral enhancement? A thought experiment using the MoralKinder (MK+) haplotype. Theor Med Bioeth 29:397–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franke AG, Bonertz C, Christmann M, Huss M, Fellgiebel A, Hildt E, Lieb K (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44:60–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garreau J (2006) A dose of genius: “smart pills” are on the rise. But is taking them wise. Washington Post, June 11, 2006, D01

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon W (2006) Psychopharmacology and memory. J Med Ethics 32:74–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greely HT (2010) Enhancing brains: what are we afraid of? Cerebrum. http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=28786

  • Greely HT, Sahakian B, Harris J, Kessler RC, Gazzaniga MS, Campbell P, Farah MJ (2008) Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456:702–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall S (2003) The quest for a smart pill. Sci Am 289:54–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton R, Messing S, Chatterjee A (2011) Rethinking the thinking cap: ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation. Neurology 76:187–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2010) Enhancements are a moral obligation. Wellcome Sci 1:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2009) Technoprogressive biopolitics and human enhancement. In: Moreno JD, Berger S (eds) Progress in bioethics: science, policy, and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2010) Contradictions from the enlightenment roots of transhumanism. J Med Philos 35:622–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1957) New bottles for new wine. Chatto & Windus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman SE (2011) Cognitive enhancement: promises and perils. Neuron 69:595–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D (2007) The depths of disgust. Nature (Lond) 447:768–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett B (1892) The dialogues of Plato: translated into English, with analyses and introductions. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadosh RC, Levy N, O’Shea J, Shea N, Savulescu J (2012) The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation. Curr Biol 22:R108–R111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kass LR (1997) The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. New Repubic 216:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer F (2010) Authenticity anyone? The enhancement of emotions via neuro-psychopharmacology. Neuroethics 4:51–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy N (2011) Enhancing authenticity. J Appl Philos 28:308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe S, Knight J, Teter C, Wechsler H (2005) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction 100:96–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben B (2003) Enough: staying human in an engineered age. Times Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlman MJ, Berg JW, Juengst ET, Kodish E (2011) Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20:30–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier H, Sperber D (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav Brain Sci 34:57–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C (2006) The republican war on science. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JD (2011) The body politic. Bellevue Literary Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler RC, Reiner PB (2010) A call for data to inform discussion on cognitive enhancement. Biosocieties 5:481–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler RC, Fitz N, Manogaran P, Chong E, Reiner PB (submitted) Public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (2010) What puts the “yuck” in the yuck factor? Bioethics 25:267–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2004) Hiding from humanity: disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram SM (2012) Ethical considerations in the framing of the cognitive enhancement debate. Neuroethics 2:172–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens E (1998) Is better always good? The enhancement project. Hastings Cent Rep 28:S1–S17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge B, Lucke J, Finnoff J, Hall W (2011) Begging important questions about cognitive enhancement, again. Am J Bioeth 11:14–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persson I, Savulescu J (2008) The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. J Appl Philos 25:162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) Beyond therapy: biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington, DC, p 373

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine E, Forlini C (2010) Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Neuroethics 3:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner PB (2010) The rise of neuroessentialism. In: Illes J, Sahakian B (eds) Oxford handbook of neuroethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2002) Fusion biopolitics. Nation-New York 274:7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis J, Simmons JP, Goodwin GP (2008) Preferences for enhancement pharmaceuticals: the reluctance to enhance fundamental traits. J Consum Res 35:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P, Millman L, Nemeroff C (1986) Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(4):703–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P, Haidt J, Fincher K (2009) Psychology. From oral to moral. Science 323:1179–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahakian BJ, Morein-Zamir S (2011) Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 25:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J (2005) New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance. Reprod Biomed Online 10:36–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J (2006) Justice, fairness, and enhancement. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1093:321–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schermer M (2008) Enhancements, easy shortcuts, and the richness of human activities. Bioethics 22:355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S (2009) Mindscan: transcending and enhancing the human brain. In: Schneider S (ed) Science fiction and philosophy: from time travel to superintelligence. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz K (2006) Brave neuro world. The Nation 282:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Kelleher KJ (2010) Neuroenhancement in young people: proposal for research, policy, and clinical management. AJOB Neurosci 1:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stix G (2009) Turbocharging the brain. Sci Am Mag 301:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C (2005) Moral heuristics. Behav Brain Sci 28:531–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1989) Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • White BP, Becker-Blease KA, Grace-Bishop K (2006) Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. J Am Coll Health 54:261–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Peter B. Reiner

Authors
  1. Peter B. Reiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter B. Reiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Philosophy, University of Mainz, Jakob Welder-Weg 18, Mainz, 55099, Germany

    Elisabeth Hildt

  2. , Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, Mainz, 55131, Germany

    Andreas G. Franke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiner, P.B. (2013). The Biopolitics of Cognitive Enhancement. In: Hildt, E., Franke, A. (eds) Cognitive Enhancement. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation