Skip to main content

Regional Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia: Learning from the Success of Urban-Rural Cooperation in Metropolitan Yogyakarta

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cleavage, Connection and Conflict in Rural, Urban and Contemporary Asia

Part of the book series: ARI - Springer Asia Series ((ARI,volume 3))

Abstract

Asian urbanization has been typified by, among other things, the growth of rural-urban regions, in which functional urban areas have extended beyond established city boundaries into their immediate rural zones. In dealing with this extended urbanization, in the context of decentralizing Indonesia, urban-rural cooperation has become an important issue. This chapter explores key success factors of interlocal government cooperation in Greater Yogyakarta, which has shown evidence of effective regional infrastructure provision and rural environmental protection. By assessing the mechanism, process, and typology of the cooperation practiced, it reveals that there are several key success factors enabling effective interaction and collaboration between the participating urban and rural governments. The key success factors include common vision sharing and the building of strong leadership, a horizontal dialogue process, and openness and transparency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duque, S. H. D., & Hermawati, K. (2004). Thinking public, acting urban, solving problems together: Inter-municipal Cooperation Kartamantul. Yogyakarta: Sekber Kartamantul and GTZ UQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R. C. (2004). Introduction to regionalism and institutional collective action. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 356–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T. (2000). Rural to urban land conversion in Indonesia during boom and bust periods. Land Use Policy, 17(1), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T. (2004). New town development in Jakarta metropolitan region: A perspective of spatial segregation. Habitat International, 28(3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T. (2008). In search of a governance institution model for Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA) under Indonesia’s new decentralisation policy: Old problems, new challenges. Public Administration and Development, 28(4), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization reform and local-government proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a fragmentation of regional development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2–3), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T. (2010). Multi local-government under Indonesia’s decentralization reform: The case of Kartamantul (The Greater Yogyakarta). Habitat International, 34(4), 400–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1998). The common good: Assessing the performance of cities. In J. Friedmann (Ed.), Urban and regional governance in the Asia Pacific (pp. 1–16). Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2001). The governance of city-regions in East and Southeast Asia. disP, 145(2), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (1999). Law No. 22/1999 on regional administration. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2000). Government regulation 129/2000 on the requirements for the formation and criteria of regional proliferation, deletion and combination. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. (2004). Law No. 32/2004 regarding regional administration. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. (2007). The promise of good governance. In M. Grindle (Ed.), Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance (pp. 164–186). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. V. (2010). Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeg, S., Klagge, B., & Ossenbruügge, J. (2003). Metropolitan cooperation in Europe: Theoretical issues and perspectives for urban networking 1. European Planning Studies, 11(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudalah, D., Winarso, H., & Woltjer, J. (2007). Peri-urbanisation in East Asia: A new challenge for planning? International Development Planning Review, 29(4), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudalah, D., Winarso, H., & Woltjer, J. (2010). Policy networking as capacity building: An analysis of regional road development conflict in Indonesia. Planning Theory, 9(4), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2002). Southeast Asian urbanization and the growth of mega-urban regions. Journal of Population Research, 19(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laquian, A. A. (2005a). Beyond metropolis: The planning and governance of Asia’s mega-urban regions. Washington, DC/Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laquian, A. A. (2005b). Metropolitan governance reform in Asia. Public Administration and Development, 25(4), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, M. (1996). Building the road for the BMW: Culture, vision, and the extended metropolitan region of Jakarta. Environment and Planning, 28(9), 1617–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Shen, J. (2009). A study on inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze river delta region, China. Habitat International, 33(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, T. G. (1991). The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, & T. G. McGee (Eds.), The extended metropolis: Settlement transition in Asia (pp. 3–26). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, S. S. (2004). Metropolitan area governance and institutional collective action. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp. 67–92). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A., & Thompson, T. (2004). Implementing decentralized local governance: A treacherous road with potholes, detours and road closures (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3353). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinacker, A. (2004). Game theoretic models of metropolitan cooperation. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp. 45–66). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryokusumo, R. F. A. (2008). Pelayanan publik dan pengelolaan infrastruktur perkotaan [Public Service and Urban Infrastructure Management]. Yogyakarta: Sinergi Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutrisno. (2004). Joint secretariat: A method for integrating urban management of bordering local government in a new decentralization era in Indonesia. Paper presented at the 19th EAROPH World Planning and Housing Congress and Australian National Housing conference, Melbourne, Australia, 19–22 September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso, H. (2006). Perkembangan kawasan metropolitan. In H. Winarso & D. Hudalah (Eds.), Metropolitan di Indonesia: Kenyataan dan tantangan dalam perencanaan [Metropolitan in Indonesia: Reality and challenges in planning] (pp. 57–104). Jakarta: Ditjen Penataan Ruang, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso, H., & Firman, T. (2002). Residential land development in Jabotabek, Indonesia: Triggering economic crisis? Habitat International, 26(4), 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy Firman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hudalah, D., Zulfahmi, F., Firman, T. (2013). Regional Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia: Learning from the Success of Urban-Rural Cooperation in Metropolitan Yogyakarta. In: Bunnell, T., Parthasarathy, D., Thompson, E. (eds) Cleavage, Connection and Conflict in Rural, Urban and Contemporary Asia. ARI - Springer Asia Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5482-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics