Skip to main content

Introduction to Ultimate Unity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities

Abstract

Each of the papers in this section focuses in different ways on monism—the view that ontologically speaking there is only one thing or one kind of thing—and its significance for a particular model of “God.” The term “God” is being used here generically and does not, for example, refer necessarily to a theistic God, meaning God conceived of as a “person” and as ontologically distinct from or transcendent to creation. Each of the authors argues a case for the religious and practical significance of the monistic views they present. The central question then is whether and in what ways monism is religiously significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Owen (1971, p. 72).

  2. 2.

    Lipner (1984, 1985).

  3. 3.

    Toland (1976) (reprint 1751), pp. 32-33.

  4. 4.

    See Pataki (2007).

  5. 5.

    See Levine (1994), section 2.3.

  6. 6.

    Smith 1925–1926, pp. 7–8. Smith quotes William James, Pragmatism: “I suspect … that in but few of you has this problem occasioned sleepless nights … I myself have come, by long brooding over it, to consider it the most central of all philosophical problems … I mean by this that if you know whether a man is a decided monist or a decided pluralist, you perhaps know more about the rest of his opinions that if you give him any other name ending in ist.”

  7. 7.

    Hamlyn (1984, p. 38).

  8. 8.

    Lovejoy (1960, pp. 12–13).

  9. 9.

    My thanks to Jeanine Diller for comments and revisions.

References

  • Hamlyn, D.W. 1984. Metaphysics. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Michael. 1994. Pantheism: A non-theistic concept of deity. London: Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipner, J.J. 1984. The world as God’s ’Body’: In pursuit of dialogue with Ramanuja. Religious Studies 20: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipner, J.J. 1985. Ramanuja: The face of truth. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur. 1960. The great chain of being. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, H.P. 1971. Concepts of deity. London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataki, Tamas. 2007. Against religion. Melbourne: Scribe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.A. 1925–1926. The issue between monism and pluralism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 26: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toland, John. 1976. Repr. of the 1751 ed. Pantheisticon. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Levine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levine, M. (2013). Introduction to Ultimate Unity. In: Diller, J., Kasher, A. (eds) Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics