Skip to main content

On the Fatal Attractiveness of Psychology: Racism of Intelligence in Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology

Part of the book series: Educational Research ((EDRE,volume 6))

Abstract

Psychology has penetrated many domains of society and can be considered as a very successful social science. It is widely present in education, in the workplace, in court and not to mention in people’s private life. This success owes to a large extent to the fact that psychology offers a scientific credit to an important and key cultural principle in our Western societies: the belief of the primacy of the individual over the situation as a cause of behaviour. Psychology has played a key role in substantiating this cultural frame by proposing an ‘objective’ measure of intelligence and by repeatedly fuelling the idea that in a democratic society and a competitive educational system, the more intelligent are the winners. Hand in hand, education and psychology have contributed to a powerful illusion that hides the impact of power and privilege in the schools and recycle then into individual merit. This chapter focuses on the love story between social domination and the psychology of intelligence. I discuss the development of intelligence testing and show how research in psychology has served the domination and expropriation of the haves over the have-nots. I call this form of social control the racism of intelligence, which, in a latter point, I expose the main characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, G., Biernat, M., Branscombe, N. R., Crandall, C. S., & Wrightsman, L. S. (2008). Beyond prejudice: Toward a sociocultural psychology of racism and oppression. In G. Adams, M. Biernat, N. R. Branscombe, C. S. Crandall, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Commemorating Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination(pp. 215–246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1976). Scientific affairs. American Psychologist, 32, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2006). Final report. Retrieved November 23, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/pi/fonsesreport.pdf

  • Baron, J., & Norman, F. (1992). SATs, achievement tests, and high school class rank as predictors of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1047–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff, D. N. (1981). Testing and the law. American Psychologist, 36, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1911). Nouvelles recherches sur la mesure du niveau intellectuel chez les enfants d’école [New studies on the measurement of the intellectual level among pupils]. L’Année Psychologique, 19, 145–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for the intellectual diagnosis of abnormal people]. L’Année Psychologique, 11, 191–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développement de l’intelligence chez les enfants [The development of intelligence in children]. L’Année Psychologique, 16, 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisseret, N. (1974). Les inégaux ou la sélection universitaire[Inequals or college selection]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisseret, N. (1979). Education, class language and ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1978). Le racisme de l’intelligence [The racism of intelligence]. Cahiers, Droit et Liberté (Races, sociétés et aptitudes: apports et limites de la science), 382, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction. Paris: Editions de Minuit. English Translation (1977) Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Day, E. A. (2006). The difference isn’t black and white: Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s advanced progressive matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1909). Experimental tests of general intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P. D. (1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis Terman, applied psychology and the intelligence testing movement, 1890–1930. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, A. (1977). The legacy of Malthus. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., Chein, I., & Cook, S. W. (1952/2004). The effects of segregation and the consequences of desegregation: A (September 1952) social science statement in the Brown v. Board of Education of TopekaSupreme Court Case. American Psychologist, 59, 495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of test with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J.-C., Després, G., Gauzins, M.-E., Huguet, P., Leyens, J.-P., & Méot, A. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J. C., & Dutrévis, M. (2004). Why test scores do not equal merit. Journal of Poverty, 8, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (2004). Affirmative action is dead long live affirmative action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decroly, O., & Degand, J. (1910). La mesure de l’intelligence chez les enfants normaux d’après les tests de Binet et Simon [The measure of intelligence among normal children according to the Binet-Simon tests]. Archives de Psychologie, 9(81), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disckson, V. E. (1919). Scientific methods applied to vocational guidance. Report of the superintendent of schools, Oakland, California, 1917–1918 (pp. 226–231). Oakland, CA: Tribune Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. O. (1916). The psychology of the Negro: An experimental study(Archives of Psychology Series, 36), New York: The Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. N. (1924). Sorting the students. Educational Review, 68, 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garth, T. R. (1925). A review of racial psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 22, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and the SAT II at the University of California. Retrieved December 5, 2003, from http://www.ucop.edu/sas/research/researchandplanning/pdf/sat_study.pdf

  • Gobineau, J. A. (1852). Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines[Essay on the inequality of human races]. Paris: Belfon. (Work initially published in 1852).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1916). Introduction. In A. Binet & T. Simon (Eds.), The development of intelligence in children(p. 5). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1992). Assessing the validity of the GRE for students in psychology: A validity generalization approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1019–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effect of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, R. V. (1976). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itard, J. (1998). Victor de l’Aveyron (new edition). Paris: Allia. English translation: Itard, J. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published in 1801 and 1806).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1974). What is the question? What is the evidence? In T. S. Kawieck (Ed.), The psychologists(Vol. 2, pp. 206–234). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioural distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., & Harvey, J. (2008). The decline of the world’s IQ. Intelligence, 36, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on self(pp. 1–57). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, A. (1980). The reign of ETS: The corporation that makes up minds. Center for the Study of Responsive Law. Ralph Nader.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association. (1922). Intelligence tests and school reorganization. Subcommittee report to the Commission on Revision of Elementary Education. New York: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, V., & Markus, H. R. (2005). The “inside” story: A cultural-historical analysis of being smart and motivated, American style. In C. Dweck & A. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation(pp. 457–488). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1997). Race, racism and psychology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1966). Emile ou de l’éducation. Paris: Grasset. English Translation (1979): Emile or, on education.London: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1762)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. M. (1997). Contempt and pity: Social policy and the image of the damaged black psyche 1880–1996. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. H. (1855–1870). Principles of psychology(Vol. 2). London: Willimas & Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetson, G. R. (1897). Some memory test of whites and blacks. Psychological Review, 4, 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, A. C. (1913). Three hundred fifty white and colored children measured by the Binet-Simon measuring scale of intelligence. Pedagogical Seminary, 20, 485–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon scales. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1919). The intelligence in school children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., Dickson, V. E., Sutherland, A. H., Franzen, R. H., Tupper, C. R., & Fernald, G. (1923). Intelligence test and school reorganization. New York: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. H. (1994). Science and politics of racial research. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. H. (2002). The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer fund. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, F. E., & Bowen, W. C. (1998). SAT scores, race and academic performance in selective colleges and in universities. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap(pp. 457–479). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1914/1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, A. S. (1998). Science in the service of the far right: Henry E. Garrett, the IAAEE, and the Liberty Lobby. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Science, 15, 1–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenderland, L. (1998). Measuring minds: Henry Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Claude Croizet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Croizet, JC. (2013). On the Fatal Attractiveness of Psychology: Racism of Intelligence in Education. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology. Educational Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics