Abstract
Psychology has penetrated many domains of society and can be considered as a very successful social science. It is widely present in education, in the workplace, in court and not to mention in people’s private life. This success owes to a large extent to the fact that psychology offers a scientific credit to an important and key cultural principle in our Western societies: the belief of the primacy of the individual over the situation as a cause of behaviour. Psychology has played a key role in substantiating this cultural frame by proposing an ‘objective’ measure of intelligence and by repeatedly fuelling the idea that in a democratic society and a competitive educational system, the more intelligent are the winners. Hand in hand, education and psychology have contributed to a powerful illusion that hides the impact of power and privilege in the schools and recycle then into individual merit. This chapter focuses on the love story between social domination and the psychology of intelligence. I discuss the development of intelligence testing and show how research in psychology has served the domination and expropriation of the haves over the have-nots. I call this form of social control the racism of intelligence, which, in a latter point, I expose the main characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, G., Biernat, M., Branscombe, N. R., Crandall, C. S., & Wrightsman, L. S. (2008). Beyond prejudice: Toward a sociocultural psychology of racism and oppression. In G. Adams, M. Biernat, N. R. Branscombe, C. S. Crandall, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Commemorating Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination(pp. 215–246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (1976). Scientific affairs. American Psychologist, 32, 427.
American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2006). Final report. Retrieved November 23, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/pi/fonsesreport.pdf
Baron, J., & Norman, F. (1992). SATs, achievement tests, and high school class rank as predictors of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1047–1055.
Bersoff, D. N. (1981). Testing and the law. American Psychologist, 36, 1047–1056.
Binet, A. (1911). Nouvelles recherches sur la mesure du niveau intellectuel chez les enfants d’école [New studies on the measurement of the intellectual level among pupils]. L’Année Psychologique, 19, 145–201.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for the intellectual diagnosis of abnormal people]. L’Année Psychologique, 11, 191–244.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développement de l’intelligence chez les enfants [The development of intelligence in children]. L’Année Psychologique, 16, 1–94.
Bisseret, N. (1974). Les inégaux ou la sélection universitaire[Inequals or college selection]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bisseret, N. (1979). Education, class language and ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1978). Le racisme de l’intelligence [The racism of intelligence]. Cahiers, Droit et Liberté (Races, sociétés et aptitudes: apports et limites de la science), 382, 67–71.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction. Paris: Editions de Minuit. English Translation (1977) Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Brown, R., & Day, E. A. (2006). The difference isn’t black and white: Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s advanced progressive matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.
Burt, C. (1909). Experimental tests of general intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 143–144.
Chapman, P. D. (1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis Terman, applied psychology and the intelligence testing movement, 1890–1930. New York: New York University Press.
Chase, A. (1977). The legacy of Malthus. New York: Knopf.
Clark, K. B., Chein, I., & Cook, S. W. (1952/2004). The effects of segregation and the consequences of desegregation: A (September 1952) social science statement in the Brown v. Board of Education of TopekaSupreme Court Case. American Psychologist, 59, 495–501.
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of test with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.
Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.
Croizet, J.-C., Després, G., Gauzins, M.-E., Huguet, P., Leyens, J.-P., & Méot, A. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721–732.
Croizet, J. C., & Dutrévis, M. (2004). Why test scores do not equal merit. Journal of Poverty, 8, 91–107.
Crosby, F. (2004). Affirmative action is dead long live affirmative action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Decroly, O., & Degand, J. (1910). La mesure de l’intelligence chez les enfants normaux d’après les tests de Binet et Simon [The measure of intelligence among normal children according to the Binet-Simon tests]. Archives de Psychologie, 9(81), 108.
Disckson, V. E. (1919). Scientific methods applied to vocational guidance. Report of the superintendent of schools, Oakland, California, 1917–1918 (pp. 226–231). Oakland, CA: Tribune Publishing.
Ferguson, G. O. (1916). The psychology of the Negro: An experimental study(Archives of Psychology Series, 36), New York: The Science Press.
Freeman, F. N. (1924). Sorting the students. Educational Review, 68, 170–171.
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
Garth, T. R. (1925). A review of racial psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 22, 343–364.
Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and the SAT II at the University of California. Retrieved December 5, 2003, from http://www.ucop.edu/sas/research/researchandplanning/pdf/sat_study.pdf
Gobineau, J. A. (1852). Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines[Essay on the inequality of human races]. Paris: Belfon. (Work initially published in 1852).
Goddard, H. H. (1916). Introduction. In A. Binet & T. Simon (Eds.), The development of intelligence in children(p. 5). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Goldberg, E. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1992). Assessing the validity of the GRE for students in psychology: A validity generalization approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1019–1027.
Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effect of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
Guthrie, R. V. (1976). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
Itard, J. (1998). Victor de l’Aveyron (new edition). Paris: Allia. English translation: Itard, J. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published in 1801 and 1806).
Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1974). What is the question? What is the evidence? In T. S. Kawieck (Ed.), The psychologists(Vol. 2, pp. 206–234). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.
Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioural distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.
Lynn, R., & Harvey, J. (2008). The decline of the world’s IQ. Intelligence, 36, 112–120.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on self(pp. 1–57). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Nairn, A. (1980). The reign of ETS: The corporation that makes up minds. Center for the Study of Responsive Law. Ralph Nader.
National Education Association. (1922). Intelligence tests and school reorganization. Subcommittee report to the Commission on Revision of Elementary Education. New York: World Book Company.
Plaut, V., & Markus, H. R. (2005). The “inside” story: A cultural-historical analysis of being smart and motivated, American style. In C. Dweck & A. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation(pp. 457–488). New York: Guilford.
Richards, G. (1997). Race, racism and psychology. New York: Routledge.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1966). Emile ou de l’éducation. Paris: Grasset. English Translation (1979): Emile or, on education.London: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1762)
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
Scott, D. M. (1997). Contempt and pity: Social policy and the image of the damaged black psyche 1880–1996. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Spencer, H. H. (1855–1870). Principles of psychology(Vol. 2). London: Willimas & Norgate.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Stetson, G. R. (1897). Some memory test of whites and blacks. Psychological Review, 4, 285–289.
Strong, A. C. (1913). Three hundred fifty white and colored children measured by the Binet-Simon measuring scale of intelligence. Pedagogical Seminary, 20, 485–515.
Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon scales. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Terman, L. M. (1919). The intelligence in school children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Terman, L. M., Dickson, V. E., Sutherland, A. H., Franzen, R. H., Tupper, C. R., & Fernald, G. (1923). Intelligence test and school reorganization. New York: World Book.
Tucker, W. H. (1994). Science and politics of racial research. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.
Tucker, W. H. (2002). The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer fund. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.
Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.
Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Vars, F. E., & Bowen, W. C. (1998). SAT scores, race and academic performance in selective colleges and in universities. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap(pp. 457–479). Washington, DC: Brookings.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.
Weber, M. (1914/1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Winston, A. S. (1998). Science in the service of the far right: Henry E. Garrett, the IAAEE, and the Liberty Lobby. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 179–209.
Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Science, 15, 1–890.
Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy. London: Penguin.
Zenderland, L. (1998). Measuring minds: Henry Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper Collins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Croizet, JC. (2013). On the Fatal Attractiveness of Psychology: Racism of Intelligence in Education. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology. Educational Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5037-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5038-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)