Skip to main content

The Territory Agronomy Approach in research, education and training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic

Abstract

Landscape and territory agronomy analyses the two-way relationship between farming practices and land patterns. It takes into account both agro-environmental and socio-economic processes. A conceptual framework is presented to facilitate understanding of the complex interactions between the disciplines that contribute to this new field of research. We discuss the organisational issues that arise at various spatial and temporal scales during the development of territory-based case studies and research projects. The territory agronomy approach is a participatory action science. Building on our experiences, we propose a conceptual research-education-action platform for land management and territorial development. It demonstrates that the Territory Agronomy Approach is an iterative process where researchers, teachers, trainers and stakeholders develop new questions and methods through participation. These characteristics make the territory agronomy approach adapted to promote the territorial dimension in research, education and training activities on farming systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Full papers available at: http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/index.php?id=62

    Full papers available at: http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/index.php?id=112#c290

  2. 2.

    See: http://www.agroparistech.fr/Masteres-Specialises-Advanced.html

References

  • Angeon, V., & Lardon, S. (2008). Participation and governance in territorial development projects. The ‘territory game’ as a local leadership system. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 11, 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, M., Crépineau, C., Feidt, C., Amiaud, B., Le Roux, Y., Piutti, S., & Jurjanz, S. (2008). When students faced rural realities: Learning complexity in a rural region. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 1011–1016). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Benoît, M., & Lardon, S. (2010). When students faced rural and peri-urban realities: An interactive module on ‘Local integrated management for rural development’ case. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2217–2221). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Benoît, M., Rizzo, D., Marraccini, E., Moonen, C., Galli, M., Lardon S., Rapey, H., Thenail, C., & Bonari, E. (under review). Landscape agronomy: A new perspective for research on agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiffin, J. (2004). Dossier Interdisciplinarité: Territoire: agronomie, géographie, écologie, où en est-on ? Le point de vue d’un chercheur agronome. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 12, 307–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borin, M., Sartori, L., & Menini, C. (1997). Effects of tillage systems on energy and carbon balance in north-eastern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research, 40, 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F., Carlesi, S., Moonen, A.-C., & Bàrberi, P. (2010). Knowing the landscape to understand the territory: A case study in agronomy education. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2191–2200). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Breton, M. J., Tassone, V., de Groot, R., Camilleri, M., & Moncada, S. (2011). A framework for participatory impact assessment: Involving stakeholders in European policy making, a case study of land use change in Malta. Ecology and Society, 16, 29. From http://wwwecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art29/

  • Brunet, R. (1986). La carte-modèle et les chorèmes. Mappemonde, 86, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burel, F., & Baudry, J. (1995). Species biodiversity in changing agricultural landscapes: A case study in the Pays d‘Auge, France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 55, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona-Torres, C., Parra-Lopez, C., Groot, J. C. J., & Rossing, W. A. H. (2011). Collective action for multi-scale environmental management: Achieving landscape policy objectives through cooperation of local resource managers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caron, P. (2005). À quels territoires s’intéressent les agronomes? Le point de vue d’un géographe tropicaliste. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., & Dedieu, B. (2012). Farming Systems Research: An approach to inquiry. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: A new dynamic (pp. 3–31). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B., & Lardon, S. (2003). Figures du projet territorial. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debolini, M. (2010). Evoluzione dell’agricoltura e problematiche di conservazione del suolo nei territori agricoli mediterranei. Perfezionamento in Scienze Agrarie, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffontaines, J.-P. (1998). Les sentiers d’un géoagronome. Paris: Editions Arguments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffontaines, J.-P., Thenail, C., & Baudry, J. (1995). Agricultural systems and landscape patterns: how can we build a relationship? Landscape and Urban Planning, 31, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, M. B., Wedderburn, M. E., Parminter, T. G., Thorrold, B. S., & Quinn, J. M. (2008). Transformation toward agricultural sustainability in New Zealand hill country pastoral landscapes. Agricultural Systems, 98, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosso, M., & Soulard, C. (2008). Landscape study of the interactions between nature and society: A training course to analyse and agrarian system in a territory. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 955–960). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • EEA. (2010). The European environment – State and outlook 2010. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoz, S., Bowring, J., & Perkins, H. C. (2001). Tastes in tension: Form, function and meaning in New Zealand’s farmed landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, M., Monteil, C., & Legras, M. (2008). Teaching companion modelling to agronomy students: An original way to integrate concepts in agriculture and environment. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 979–983). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • European Union. (2010). Agriculture in the European Union – Statistical and economic information 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/agrista/2009/table_en/2009enfinal.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2010.

  • Eurostat. (2009). LUCAS maps – Landscape diversity expressed as Shannon Evenness Index, by NUTS 2 regions. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/lucas/data/lucas_maps. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.

  • Gibbon, D. (2012). Methodological themes in Farming Systems Research and implications for learning in higher education. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 95–115). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi, C., Eiselt, B., & Ghetti, P. F. (1999). A multicriteria approach for mapping risks of agricultural pollution for water resources: The Venice Lagoon watershed case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 56, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halada, L., Evans, D., Romao, C., & Petersen, J. E. (2011). Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices? Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 2365–2378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. (2012). Systems practice: Making the systems in Farming Systems Research effective. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, S. (2006). La modélisation graphique. In M. Benoît, J.-P. Deffontaines, & S. Lardon (Eds.), Acteurs et territoires locaux. Vers une géoagronomie de l’aménagement (pp. 33–55). Paris: Editions INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, S. (2009). Former des ingénieurs-projets en développement territorial. Un itinéraire méthodologique pour faciliter la participation des acteurs. In P. Béguin & M. Cerf (Eds.), Dynamiques des savoirs, dynamiques des changements (pp. 209–227). Toulouse: Editions Octarés.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, S., Moquay, P., & Poss, Y. (2007). Développement territorial et diagnostic prospectif. Réflexions autour du viaduc de Millau. Paris: Editions de l’Aube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, S., Angeon, V., Trognon, L., & LeBlanc, P. (2010a). Usage du ‘jeu de territoire’ pour faciliter la construction d’une vision partagée du territoire dans une démarche participative. In D. Ricard (Ed.), Développement durable des territoires: de la mobilisation des acteurs aux démarches participatives (Ceramac N°28, pp. 129–145). Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardon, S., Loudiyi, S., Galli, M., Marraccini, E., Houdart, M., & Bonari, E. (2010b). From territory agronomy to regional planning: Agricultural management in periurban areas. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2201–2205). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Lazrak, E. G., Mari, J. F., & Benoît, M. (2010). Landscape regularity modelling for environmental challenges in agriculture. Landscape Ecology, 25, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marraccini, E. (2010). La valutazione delle funzioni agro-ambientali: un approccio agronomico-territoriale. Tesi di Perfezionamento in Scienze Agrarie, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Italy and AgroParisTech, France. http://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00589832/fr/. Accessed 28 Sept 2011.

  • Martin, P. (2008). A role-playing game allowing students to experiment with the benefits of territory agronomy to prevent natural disasters. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 985–990). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Martin, G., Felten, B., & Duru, M. (2011). Forage rummy: A game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems. Environmental Modeling and Software, 26, 1442–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelin, Y., Gustavsson, R., Pinto Correia, T., Briffaud, S., Geelmuyden, A. K., Konkolyne-Gyuro, E., & Pirnat, J. (2008). The Landscape Ambassador Experience: Towards a new educational approach for improving landscape planning and management with farming systems and the European Landscape Convention in mind. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 961–970). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Moonen, A. C., Galli, M., Lardon, S., Rapey, H., Silvestri, N., Benoit, M., Thenail, C., Marraccini, E., Rizzo, R., Debolini, M., Bàrberi, P., & Bonari, E. (2010). A winter school in landscape agronomy and the synergies it created. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2176–2183). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Nassauer, J. I., & Opdam, P. (2008). Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, S., Douglas Mankin, K., Hutchinson, S., Gay, M., & Selfa, T. (2010). AREM: An original joint educational program to improve the sustainability of agricultural natural resources and environmental management. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2184–2190). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Pelosi, C., Goulard, M., & Balent, G. (2010). The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: Do difficulties come from underlying theoretical frameworks? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 139, 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correira, T., Michelin, Y., & Ramos, I. A. J. (2010). Analyzing transition processes in rural landscapes: The farm systems approach. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2222–2227). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Poudel, D. D., Midmore, D. J., & West, L. T. (2000). West Farmer participatory research to minimize soil erosion on steepland vegetable systems in the Philippines. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prévost, P. (Ed.). (2005). Agronomes et territoires. Deuxième édition des Entretiens du Pradel. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapey, H., Lardon, S., Galli, M., Moonen, C., Benoit, M., Thenail, C., Barberi, P., Caron, P., Marraccini, E., Rizzo, & Bonari, E. (2008). Experiences from a winter school on landscape agronomy: Stakes, difficulties, perspectives. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposium, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 999–1004). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Styger, E., Rakotondramasy, H. M., Pfeffer, M. J., Fernandes, E. C. M., & Bates, D. M. (2007). Influence of slash-and-burn farming practices on fallow succession and land degradation in the rainforest region of Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 119, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasser, E., Ruffini, F. V., & Tappeiner, U. (2009). An integrative approach for analysing landscape dynamics in diverse cultivated and natural mountain areas. Landscape Ecology, 24, 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thenail, C., & Baudry, J. (2004). Variation of farm spatial land use pattern according to the structure of the hedgerow network (bocage) landscape: A case study in northeast Brittany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therond, O., Bergez, J.-E., Paillard, D., Grieu, P., Willaume, M., Ouin, A., & Auricoste, C. (2010). From farm, landscape and territory analysis to scenario exercise: An educational programme on participatory integrated analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2206–2216). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G., & Opdam, P. (2005). From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M., Moran, J., Regan, E., Gormally, M., & Skeffington, M. S. (2007). The Irish agri-environment: How turlough users and non-users view converging EU agendas of Natura 2000 and CAP. Land Use Policy, 24, 362–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemen, L., Verburg, P. H., Hein, L., & van Mensvoort, M. E. F. (2008). Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 88, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Tian, H., Pan, S., Liu, M., Lockaby, G., Schilling, E. B., & Stanturf, J. (2008). Effects of forest regrowth and urbanization on ecosystem carbon storage in a rural-urban gradient in the south-eastern United States. Ecosystems, 11, 1211–1222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to clarify that the development of the Territory Agronomy Approach is an ongoing process which results from various interaction the authors have in their research projects and education and training experiences. We are therefore grateful to all colleagues, students and stakeholders we have interacted with in the past years, and all participants to the 2008 and 2010 IFSA sessions on ‘Education in Landscape and Territory Agronomy’. We want to express special thanks to the following people for their significant contribution to the development of the Territory Agronomy Approach: Enrico Bonari, Paolo Bàrberi, Marc Benoit, Patrick Caron, Claudine Thenail, Hélène Rapey, Teresa Pinto-Correia and Davide Rizzo. Thanks again to Davide for preparing the Fig. 12.4, the Landscape and Territory Agronomy framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvie Lardon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lardon, S., Moonen, AC., Marraccini, E., Debolini, M., Galli, M., Loudiyi, S. (2012). The Territory Agronomy Approach in research, education and training. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics