Abstract
This chapter discusses larger trends in European higher education since the early 1960s, bearing particularly on the issues that concerned Clark Kerr. A Swedish or Scandinavian and to a lesser degree a German context form the backbone of the discussion. There are special reasons why a relatively small European nation like Sweden should attract readers of this volume. First, between 1955 and 1975 Sweden was often referred to as “the most progressive and modern nation in the western world,” and certainly with regard to education policy. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) considered Sweden to be something of a model pupil. Second, Clark Kerr himself was keenly interested in Swedish/Scandinavian policy-making and reform proposals. Although Kerr was well-known in Europe, and particularly in Sweden, neither his achievements nor American experiences in general played even a secondary role in the comprehensive higher education reforms undertaken in Europe during the 1960s and 1970s. This obvious neglect is one of the reasons why most European higher education systems have experienced varying degrees of structural and institutional problems for the last 25 years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This genuinely revolutionary motto was heard, and cherished in the Western/European World. And of course it was also adhered to by – among others – poor, yet ambitious Pennsylvania Quaker schoolboys in the 1920s and 1930s. One of those, Clark Kerr, made Georges Jacques Danton’s motto to his own lifelong commitment.
References
Bartz, O. (2005). Bundesrepublikanische universitätsleitbilder: Blüte und Zerfall des Humboldtianismus. die hochschule. journal für wissenschaft und bildung, 14(2), 105–110.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organizations in cross-national perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cole, J. R. (2009). The great American research university, its rise to pre-eminence, its indispensable national role and why it must be protected. New York: Public Affairs.
De Boer, H., & Stensaker, R. (2007). An internal representative system: The democratic vision. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 99–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
Douglass, J. A. (2000). The California idea and American higher education. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ekstedt, E. (1976). Utbildningsexpansionen. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Ellwein, T. (1985). Die deutsche universität. Köninstein: Athenäum.
Engwall, L., & Nybom, T. (2008). The visible hand vs. the invisible hand: Allocation of research resources in Swedish universities. In R. Whitley & J. Gläser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences; the sociology of the sciences yearbook. Berlin: Springer.
Eriksson, R., & Jonsson, J. (1993). Ursprung och utbildning; Snedrekrytering till högre utbildning (p. 85). Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU).
Eriksson, R., & Jonsson, J. (2002). Varför består den sociala snedrekryteringen? Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 7(3), 210–217.
Erlander, T. (2011). Dagböcker 1961-1962. Hedemora: Gidlunds Förlag.
Geiger, R. (1976). European universities – the unfinished revolution. Yale Higher Education Program, Working paper 11. New Haven, Conn.
Geiger, R. (1993). Research and relevant knowledge. American research universities since WWII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kehm, B. (1999). Higher education in Germany: Developments, problems, and perspectives. Bucharest: UNESCO/CEPES.
Keller, K., & Keller, P. (2001). Making Harvard modern: The rise of America’s university. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, C. (1991). The great transformation in higher education, 1960–1980. New York: SUNY Press.
Kerr, C. (1994). Troubled times for American Higher Education: The 1990s and beyond. New York: SUNY Press.
Kerr, C. (2001). The gold and the blue, a personal memoir of the University of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kim, L. (1999). Retorik och realiteter: grundbultens öde. Stockholm: Sveriges akademikers centralorganisation (SACO).
Lindensjö, B. (1981). Högskolereformen. En studie i offentlig reformpolitik. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Neave, G. (2003). The Bologna declaration: Some historical dilemmas posed by reconstruction of the Community in Europe’s systems of higher education. Educational Policy, 17, 141–146.
Neave, G. (2006a). The Bologna Process or policy as the artilleryman’s despair: An unmoving tale of moving targets. Unpublished paper.
Neave, G. (2006b). Social dimension och social sammanhållning i Bologna-processen: eller att förlika Adam Smith med Thomas Hobbes. In K. Blückert & E. Österberg (Eds.), Gränslöst i Sverige och i världen. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Neave, G., & Veiga, A. (2011). The Bologna process: Inception, “take up”, and familiarity. Unpublished paper.
Nybom, T. (1997). Kunskap – Politik – Samhälle. Essäer om kunskapssyn, universitet och forskningspolitik 1900–2000. Stockholm: Arte.
Nybom, T. (2000). “Att redlöst ställa sig till händelsernas förfogande” – funderingar kring svensk forsknings- och utbildningspolitik. In M. Fridlund & U. Sandström (Eds.), Universitetets värden. Stockholm: Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle (SNS).
Nybom, T. (2007). A rule-governed community of scholars: The Humboldt vision in the history of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Olsen, J. P. (2000). Organisering og styring av universiteter. Nytt Norsk tidsskrift, 17(3), 231–249.
Perkin, H. (1969). Key Profession. History of the Association of University Teachers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Premfors, R. (1980). The politics of higher education in a comparative perspective. France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Ryan A. (2011, December 15). Thinking of a master plan. Times Higher Education. No. 2:029.
Schelsky, H. (1969). Die Universitätsidee Wilhelm von Humboldts und die gegenwärtige Universitätsreform: Abschied von der Hochschulpolitik. Oder: Die Universität im Fadenkreutz des Versagens. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Scott, P. (2007). The Research revolution and its impact on the European university. In K. Blückert, G. Neave, & T. Nybom (Eds.), The European research university: An historical parenthesis? (pp. 129–143). New York: Palgrave.
Strömholm, S. (1994). Den svenska högskolan; Lägesbestämning och framtidsdebatt. Stockholm: Ratio.
Svensson, L. (1987). Higher education and the state in Swedish history. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Trow, M. A. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In General report to the conference on the structure of post-secondary education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation. General Report, pp. 55–101.
Trow, M. A. (1991). The exceptionalism of American higher education. In M. A. Trow & T. Nybom (Eds.), University and society: Essays on the social roll of research and higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nybom, T. (2012). The Disintegration of Higher Education in Europe, 1970–2010: A Post-Humboldtian Essay. In: Rothblatt, S. (eds) Clark Kerr's World of Higher Education Reaches the 21st Century. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4258-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4258-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4257-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4258-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)