Skip to main content

The Sociocultural Turn in Science Education and Its Transformative Potential

  • Chapter
Sociocultural Studies and Implications for Science Education

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 12))

Abstract

The sociocultural turn in science education was immersed in mainstream logics and practices that emphasized positivism and psychological models. I describe my evolution toward the use of sociocultural theory in science education in terms of dialectics, knowing as cultural enactment, culture being experienced as patterns having thin coherence and ever-present contradictions, the salience of agency and passivity, and the centrality of theoretical generalizability. The methodologies I present as part of a multilogical approach to research include interpretive inquiry, authentic inquiry, and event oriented inquiry. Breathing meditation and mindfulness heuristics are presented as examples of a longitudinal, multilevel research program on expressed emotions and mindfulness in science classrooms. Finally, through the use of Jin Shin Jyutsu (JSJ) I illustrate how new frameworks lead to new priorities for research and practice; in this case revealing how touches and holds on the body are used to address disharmonies that arise in the body during social interactions. I identify additional research possibilities using JSJ to address wellness and sustainability as priorities for a transformative agenda for research in science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I use the pronoun we from here on to acknowledge that my research and associated theorizing involved others – throughout my career. Obviously this extended far beyond publications and includes conversations of many genres (e.g., dialogue, argument, lecture).

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 216–260). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904898012005004

  • Cobern, W. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart M. (2009). Generalized notions from qualitative inquiry In K. Ercikan, & W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Generalizing from educational research (pp. 51–66). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellner, G. (2014). Broadening our lenses of perception to advance learning: An introduction to multilectics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 169–182. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. (1988, March/April). An interview with Mary Burmeister, Master of Jin Shin Jyutsu. Yoga Journal, 79, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juffé, M. (2003). Lévinas, passivity and the three dimensions of psychotherapy. Paper presented at psychology for the other: Seminar on Emmanuel Lévinas, Seattle University, Seattle, WA. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.seattleu.edu/artsci/psychology/conference/2003/archive2003.html

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & Tobin, K. (2009). The much exaggerated death of positivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 513–528. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9178-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1999). Alterity & transcendence (M. B. Smith, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippot, P., Chapelle, G., & Blairy, S. (2002). Respiratory feedback in the generation of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 605–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000392

  • Piaget, J. (1964) Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306

  • Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1

  • Roth, W.-M. (2007). Theorizing passivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9045-6

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273

  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2010). Solidarity and conflict: Prosody as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 807–847. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9203-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. Jr. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226749198.001.0001

  • Tobin, K. (2006). Qualitative research in classrooms: Pushing the boundaries of theory and methodology. In K. Tobin & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Doing educational research: A handbook (pp. 15–59). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. G. (2008). In search of new lights: Getting the most from competing perspectives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 227–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9109-x

  • Tobin, K. (2009a). Repetition, difference and rising up with research in education. In K. Ercikan & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from educational research (pp. 149–172). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (2009b). Tuning into others’ voices: Radical listening, learning from difference, and escaping oppression. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 505–511. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9181-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (2012). Sociocultural perspectives on science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), The international handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1982). Relationships between classroom process variables and middle school science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 441–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.3.441

  • Tobin, K., & Llena, R. (2011). Producing and maintaining culturally adaptive teaching and learning of science in urban schools. In C. Murphy & K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 79–104). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. M. (2011). Multi-method, multi-theoretical, multi-level research in the learning sciences. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., & Seiler, G. (Eds.). (2005). Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11193-000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Tobin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tobin, K. (2015). The Sociocultural Turn in Science Education and Its Transformative Potential. In: Milne, C., Tobin, K., DeGennaro, D. (eds) Sociocultural Studies and Implications for Science Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4240-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics