Abstract
This introduction to the book The Capability Approach, Technology and Design consists of five parts. After a very short general introduction, I will first briefly present the capability approach, including the main concepts and debates about it. Next, I will – in an extensive literature review – take stock of what has been published so far on the capability approach, technology and design – what are the most interesting themes, discussions and ways of applying the approach? This will be divided in two sections: one on technology in general and one, more specifically, on ICT. Then I will highlight some interesting points and recurring themes from the different chapters of this book. I will end with some final reflections on the future of this emerging research topic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A concise overview of the articles in that special issue (volume 13, number 2) can be found in the editorial by Oosterlaken and van den Hoven (2011).
- 2.
- 3.
This debate is also addressed at several points in a recent edited volume by some leading scholars on the capability approach (Comim et al 2008).
- 4.
For an introductory textbook on the capability approach and human development, see the edited volume by Deneulin and Shahani (2009).
- 5.
This is not to say that nobody has ever touched upon the topic, on the contrary. Sen and Nussbaum have both mentioned the potential of technology for expanding human capabilities. A recent textbook, An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach (Deneulin and Shahani 2009), says Birdsall (2011), “provides numerous examples of the impact of ICT on various social and economic public policy sectors crucial to the enhancement of human capabilities.” Many of the annually published Human Development Reports, for which the work of Sen has provided the intellectual foundation, have also paid attention to technology. See also a recent UNDP report written by Hamel (2010). And Qureshi (2010), for example, brings up the capability approach in a recent editorial for the journal Information Technology for Development.
- 6.
Considering the rate at which new publications recently have appeared – and continue to appear – at many different places, I do not claim completeness. Without doubt there are publications which have escaped our attention. For example, articles in other languages than English have not been scrutinized on relevance. It should furthermore be noted that conference papers have not been included in this overview, even though some (like Gigler 2004) are interesting and relevant. Moreover, we have been selective in leaving out publications that only loosely mention the capability approach without discussing the approach or any of its main ideas/concepts in any detail.
- 7.
A practical application of the capability approach to this field is also mentioned by Rubbo (2010). She says that the approach, with its ideas about agency, has been a source of inspiration for the international design program Global Studio. Unfortunately, the article lacks detail on how exactly the capability approach has made a difference in this program.
- 8.
Coeckelbergh describes human enhancement as follows: “Human enhancement aims at using technology to create better humans. What this means can best be clarified by saying what it is not: its aim is not therapeutic: it does not restore humans to a ‘normal’ state but wants to create humans that are ‘better than normal’, ‘better than human’.” Human enhancement is closely associated with new and emerging technologies like neurotechnology and nanotechnology.
- 9.
Von Tunzelmann and Wang (2007), in an article on the theory of production, also use the work of Sen “to match the heterogeneity of products and their characteristics existing in markets to the heterogeneity of consumers and their demands.” Yet they stay within their own discipline and do not put it in the perspective of larger issues of poverty and development, as Cozzens et al seem to have in mind.
- 10.
Yet more macro/quantitative issues with respect to the CA and technology could certainly be useful for informing policy and is quite conceivable, considering that the literature on the capability approach at large addresses this type of work extensively.
- 11.
Nichos and Dong (Chap. 10) also mention the appropriate technology movement, I will get back to that.
- 12.
Note though that Ahmed does not refer to the appropriate technology movement.
- 13.
The case of One Laptop per Child in Australia is also briefly addressed by Nichols and Dong in Chap. 11.
References
Ahmed, M. A. (2011). ICTs for information capabilities of parliamentary stakeholders. In Z. Sobaci (Ed.), E-parliament and ICT-based legislation: Concept, experiences and lessons. Hershey: IGI Global.
Alampay, E. (2006a). Beyond access to ICTs: Measuring capabilities in the information society. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 2(3), 4–22.
Alampay, E. M. (2006b). The capability approach and access to information and communication technologies. In M. Minogue & L. Carino (Eds.), Regulatory governance in developing countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Alkire, S. (2005a). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–133.
Alkire, S. (2005b). Capability and functionings: Definition and justification. Briefing Notes (last updated September 1, 2005), Human Development and Capability Association. www.hd-ca.org
Alkire, S. (2008). Using the capability approach: Prospective and evaluative analyses. In F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, & S. Alkire (Eds.), The capability approach; concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Asveld, L., & Roeser, S. (Eds.). (2009). The ethics of technological risk. London: Earthscan.
Barja, G., & Gigler, B.-S. (2007). The concept of information poverty and how to measure it in the Latin American context. In H. Galperin & J. Marsical (Eds.), Digital poverty: Perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean. Ottawa: IDRC.
Birdsall, W. F. (2011). Human capabilities and information and communication technology: The communicative connection. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 93–106.
Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2010). Robot caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 277–288.
Clague, J. (2006). Patent injustice; applying Sen’s capability approach to biotechnologies. In S. Deneulin, M. Nebel, & N. Sagovsky (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures: The capability approach. Dordrecht: Springer.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2009). Health care, capabilities and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(2), 181–190.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2011). Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 81–92.
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., & Alkire, S. (Eds.). (2008). The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooke, E. F. (2003). Germ-line engineering, freedom, and future generations. Bioethics, 17(1), 32–58.
Cozzens, S. E., Gatchair, S., et al. (2007). Knowledge and development. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deneulin, S. (2002). Perfectionism, paternalism and liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 497–518.
Deneulin, S., & Shahani, L. (Eds.). (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach. Ottawa: Earthscan/IDRC.
Dong, A. (2008). The policy of design: A capabilities approach. Design Issues, 24(4), 76–87.
Foster, J. E., & Handy, C. (2008). External capabilities (OPHI Working Paper Series No. 08). Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI).
Frediani, A. A. (2007). Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the redress of urban poverty: A Brazilian case study. Journal of Human Development, 8(1), 133–152.
Garai, A., & Shadrach, B. (2006). Taking ICT to every Indian village; opportunities and challenges (a collection of four papers). New Delhi: OneWorld South Asia.
Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2008). Recovery from natural and man-made disasters as capabilities restoration and enhancement. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 3(4), 317–333.
Garnham, N. (1997). Amartya Sen’s “capability” approach to the evaluation of welfare: Its application to communications. Javnost – The Public, 4(4), 25–34.
Garnham, N. (2000). Amartya Sen’s “capabilities” approach to the evaluation of welfare and its applications to communications. In B. Cammaerts & J. C. Burgelmans (Eds.), Beyond competition: Broadening the scope of telecommunications policy (pp. 25–37). Brussels: VUB University Press.
Gigler, B. -S. (2004). Including the excluded – Can ICTs empower poor communities? Towards an alternative evaluation framework based on the capability approach. Paper presented at the 2004 conference of the Human Development and Capability Association, Pavia, Italy.
Gigler, B.-S. (2008). Enacting and interpreting technology—From usage to well-being: Experiences of indigenous peoples with ICTs. In C. Van Slyke (Ed.), Information communication technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey: IGI Global.
Grunfeld, H., Hak, S., et al. (2011). Understanding benefits realisation of iREACH from a capability approach perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 151–172.
Hamel, J. -Y. (2010). ICT4D and the human development and capabilities approach: The potentials of information and communication technology, United Nations Development Program. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/37.
Heeks, R. (2010). Do Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? Journal of International Development, 22, 625–640.
Hellsten, S. K. (2007). From information society to global village of wisdom? The role of ICT in realizing social justice in the developing world. In E. Rooksby & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and social justice. Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
Ibrahim, S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416.
James, J. (2006). The Internet and poverty in developing countries: Welfare economics versus a functionings-based approach. Futures, 38(3), 337–349.
Johnstone, J. (2007). Technology as empowerment: A capability approach to computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 2007(9), 73–87.
Johnstone, J. (2012). Capabilities. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & E. Spence (Eds.), The good life in a technological age. London: Routledge.
Kleine, D. (2010). ICT4What? – Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. Journal of International Development, 22(5), 674–692.
Kleine, D. (2011). The capability approach and the ‘medium of choice’: Steps towards conceptualising information and communication technologies for development. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 119–130.
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (Eds.). (2000). The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Madon, S. (2004). Evaluating the developmental impact of E-governance initiatives: An exploratory framework. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(5), 1–13.
Mansell, R. (2001). New media and the power of networks. First Dixons Public Lecture and Inaugural Professorial Lecture. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2006). The role of society in engineering risk analysis: A capabilities-based approach. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 1073–1083.
Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2007). Determining public policy and resource allocation priorities for mitigating natural hazards: A capabilities-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 489–504.
Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2008). The acceptability and the tolerability of societal risks: A capabilities-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 77–92.
Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2010). Assessing capability instead of achieved functionings in risk analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 13(2), 137–147.
Musa, P. F. (2006). Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limited accessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 213–224.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development; the capability approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice; disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Human dignity and political entitlements. In Human dignity and bioethics; essays commissioned by the President’s council on bioethics. Washington DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011a). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011b). Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39(1), 3–45.
Oosterlaken, I. (2009a). Design for development; a capability approach. Design Issues, 25(4), 91–102.
Oosterlaken, I. (2009b). The capability approach, technology and neutrality towards the good life. Paper presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Human Development and Capability Association, September 9–11, 2011, Lima, Peru.
Oosterlaken, I. (2011). Inserting technology in the relational ontology of Sen’s capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3), 425–432.
Oosterlaken, I., & van den Hoven, J. (2011). Editorial: ICT and the capability approach. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 65–67.
Qureshi, S. (2010). Editorial – Extending human capabilities through information technology applications and infrastructures. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 1–3.
Ratan, A. L., & Bailur, S. (2007). Welfare, agency and “ICT for Development”. ICTD 2007 – Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM international conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Bangalore, India. 15–16 December 2007.
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach – A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 94–114.
Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.
Rubbo, A. (2010). Towards equality, social inclusion and human development in design education: The case of global studio 2005–2008. Architectural Theory Review, 15(1), 61–87.
Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers (New Series), 35(2), 153–169.
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
Sen, A. (1987). Reply. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1990). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356.
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (2010). The mobile and the world. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(special issue 2010), 1–3.
Smith, M. L. , & Seward , C. (2009). The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(2), 213–235.
Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.
Thomas, J. J., & Parayil, G. (2008). Bridging the social and digital divides in Andhra Pradesh and Kerala: A capabilities approach. Development and Change, 39(3), 409–435.
Toboso, M. (2011). Rethinking disability in Amartya Sen’s approach: ICT and equality of opportunity. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 107–118.
van den Hoven, J. (2007). ICT and value sensitive design. In P. Goujon, S. Lavelle, P. Duquenoy, K. Kimppa, & V. Laurent (Eds.), The information society: Innovations, legitimacy, ethics and democracy (Vol. 233, pp. 67–72). Boston: Springer.
van den Hoven, J., & Rooksby, E. (2008). Distributive justice and the value of information: A (broadly) Rawlsian approach. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vaughan, D. (2011). The importance of capabilities in the sustainability of information and communications technology programs: The case of Remote Indigenous Australian Communities. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 131–150.
von Tunzelmann, N., & Wang, Q. (2007). Capabilities and production theory. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2007(18), 192–211.
Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. (2006). Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects. Information Technology for Development, 12(1), 7–24.
Wresch, W. (2007). 500 Million missing Web sites: Amartya Sen’s capability approach and measures of technological deprivation in developing countries. In E. Rooksby & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and social justice. Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
Wresch, W. (2009). Progress on the global digital divide: An ethical perspective based on Amartya Sen’s capabilities model. Ethics and Information Technology, 2009(11), 255–263.
Zheng, Y. (2007). Exploring the value of the capability approach for E-development. Paper presented at the 9th international conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Zheng, Y. (2009). Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approach. Information Technology for Development, 15(2), 66–82.
Zheng, Y., & Stahl, B. C. (2011). Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: What can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 69–80.
Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology and People, 21(3), 222–243.
Acknowledgements
This research has been made possible by a grant from NWO, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oosterlaken, I. (2012). The Capability Approach, Technology and Design: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. In: Oosterlaken, I., van den Hoven, J. (eds) The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3878-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3879-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)