Abstract
In the context of a major policy initiative by the Chinese state to better integrate western areas with the rest of the country, the government is implementing numerous programmes that affect the pastoral communities of the Tibetan Plateau. Resettlement of pastoralists away from their traditional grazing lands is the most significant intervention into their way of life. According to the design of resettlement programmes, small village settlements are viewed as ideal for establishing new lifestyles for Tibetan pastoralists who should afford increased comfort and income possibilities through better connections to infrastructure. The research results from my case study area of Zeku County, Qinghai Province, demonstrate that implementation of resettlement away from grasslands often does not reflect official planning, and that there has been a general lack of consultation with Tibetan pastoralists throughout the entire process. Due to insufficient state support for pastoralists to obtain alternative skills and livelihoods, the many resettlement villages now appearing across the eastern Tibetan plateau remain populated by unemployed pastoralists facing an uncertain future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
(i) Primary Chinese Sources: Administrative Documents Concerning Grassland Management (ADGM)
I.Chen G (ed) (2007) Sanjiangyuan ziran baohu qu shengtai baohu yi jianshe 三江源自然保护区生态保护与建设 (Ecological preservation and constructions in the Nature preservation zone of the three river sources). Qinghai peoples publishing house, Xining
II.Guanyu dui Zeku xian “sanjiangyuan” ziran baohu qu shengtai yimin xiangmu jianshe qingkuang de diaoyan 关于对泽库县三江原自然保护区生态移民项目建设情况的调研 (Investigation of the Ecological resettlement project construction situation in the Zeku County Sanjiangyuan nature reserve). 10.7.2007. Standing committee of Zeku County National people’s congress.
III.Guojia ji ziran baohu qu minglü 国家级自然保护区名录 (The name records of state level natural preservation areas). 2005. www.gov.cn/test/2005–07/28/content_17872.htm
IV.Jiakuai zangqu you mumin dingju gongcheng jianshe 加快藏区游牧民定居工程 建设 (Speeding up the construction of Nomadic settlement project in Tibetan areas). 24.04.2009. Qinghai Daily. http://xz.people.com.cn/
V.Jiaqiang shengtai baohu yu jianshe cujin ren yu ziran hexie fazhan加强生态保护与建设 促进人与自然和谐发展 (Strengten ecological protection and construction works. Promote harmonious development for people and nature). 2007. Development and reform department of Tongren County
VI.Huangnan zhou sanjiangyuan shengtai yimin gongzuo jingyan yu silu黄南洲 三江源 生态移民工作经验与思路 (Experiences and ideas concerning the Sanjiangyuan Ecological resettlement work in Huangnan Prefecture). 31.7.2007. Huangnan Prefecture Sanjiangyuan office
VII.Qinghai sheng caodi gongzuo ziliao xuanbian 1995 青海省草地工作资料选编 1995 (Selected material of the grassland work in Qinghai Province in 1995), July 1996. Qinghai department of animal husbandry, Xining
VIII.Qinghai sheng zangqu you mumin dingju gongcheng 2009 nian shishi fangan 青海省藏区游牧民定居工程2009年实施方(Implementation plan for the Nomadic settlement project in Tibetan areas of Qinghai province in 2009). 2009. Qinghai department of agriculture and animal husbandry, Xining
IX. Zeku huanying nin泽库欢迎您 (Welcome to Zeku). 2007. Zeku people’s government
X. Zeku xian sanjinagyuan shengtai yimin huibao cailiao 泽库县三江生态移民汇报材料(Report data of the Zeku Sanjiangyuan ecological resettlement). 26.7.2007. Zeku County government
XI. Zeku xian sanjiangyuan ziran baohu qu yidi banqian banqian xiangmu shishi qingkuang huibao 泽库县三江原自然保护区易地搬迁搬迁项目实施情况会报 (Situation report about the implementation of the relocation project in the Zeku County Sanjiangyuan nature reserve). 4.9.2007. Zeku County Sanjinagyuan office
XII. Zeku xian sanjiangyuan ziran baohu qu 2003–2006 nian yidi banqian banqian xiangmu shishi qingkuang 泽库县三江原自然保护区 2003–2006年易地搬迁搬迁项目实施情况会报 (Situation report about the implementation of the relocation project in the Zeku County Sanjiangyuan nature reserve). 4.9.2009. Zeku County Sanjiangyuan office
(ii) Secondary Sources
Du F (2009) (draft version). From eco-refugees to eco-migrants: a research in Maduo County in the source area of the Yellow River
Foggin M (2005) Promoting biodiversity conservation and community development in the Sanjiangyuan region. Plateau Perspectives. www.plateauperspectives.org
Goodman D (ed) (1989) China’s regional development. Routledge, London
Harris R (2010) Rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: a review of the evidence of its magnitude and causes. J Arid Environ 74:1–12
Heath J (2005) Tibet and China in the 21st century. Saqi, London
Lustgarten A (2008) China’s grosser Zug. Die Eroberung Tibets durch die höchste Eisenbahn der Welt. Scherz, Frankfurt
Paul C, Cheng L (2011) China verstehen. Sankt Ulrich, Augsburg
Ptackova J (2010) The sedentarization process in Tibetan pastoralist areas of Qinghai, China. Mongolo-Tibetica Pragensia 10:155–180
Ptackova J (2011) Sedentarisation of Tibetan pastoralists in China: implementation of the nomadic settlement project in the Tibetan Amdo area; Qinghai and Sichuan provinces. Pastor Res Policy Prac 1:4. http://www.pastoralismjournal.com/content/1/1/4
Qinghai daily (QD). 24 Apr 2009. http://xz.people.com.cn/GB/139197/139211/141080/9192660.htm
Winkler D (2010) Caterpillar Fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) production and sustainability on the Tibetan plateau and in the Himalayas. Chin J Grassl 32:96–108
Yeh E (2005) Green governmentality and pastoralism in western China: ‘converting pastures to grasslands’. Nomad Peoples 9:9–29
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my thanks to Hermann Kreutzmann for inviting me to participate on this issue and to Toni Huber for his encouragement and support to write this chapter. Further I would like to thank to sKalbzang Tshebrtan for his assistance during the fieldwork. I am also grateful for the chance to be a member of the RETPEC project funded by the European Commission, which enabled a study of recent strategy of development and environmental policy implementation in comparative rangeland areas of Eastern Tibet.
Note
1.Community or village (Chin: 村cun) refers here to the smallest administrative unit in the Chinese state administrative system. It describes an area inhabited and used by people who administratively belong to one community. The next higher administrative levels are township (Chin: 乡 xiang), county (Chin: 县 xian), prefecture (Chin: 洲 zhou), province (Chin: 省 sheng) or autonomous region (Chin: 自治区zizhiqu) and central government (Chin: 中央 zhongyang).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ptackova, J. (2012). Implementation of Resettlement Programmes Amongst Pastoralist Communities in Eastern Tibet. In: Kreutzmann, H. (eds) Pastoral practices in High Asia. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3846-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3846-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3845-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3846-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)