Abstract
Focusing on contexts of learning reminds us that no category of teachers or students is homogeneous. It also helps clarify equity – a necessary clarification, given the lack of consensus on what it is. Equity means fairness, not sameness. As such, this chapter elaborates on equity by highlighting four dimensions in mathematics education. ‘Access’ to tangible resources dominated equity discussions in the 1980s and continues in ‘opportunity to learn’ research. ‘Achievement’ refers to participation in quality mathematics classes and success in them. It is paramount in standardized tests and ‘achievement gap’ discourses. ‘Identity’ refers to supporting students in becoming better persons in their own eyes, which requires attention to their roots and a balance between attention to self and others. The ‘power’ dimension takes up issues of social transformation at many levels. Access and achievement are positioned as the dominant axis of equity. Identity and power form the critical axis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, J. (1998a). A language of teaching dilemmas: Unlocking the complex multilingual secondary mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 24–33.
Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Atweh, B., Forgasz, H., & Nebres, B. (2001). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ball, D. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40–48.
Civil, M. (2006). Working towards equity in mathematics education: A focus on learners, teachers and parents. In S. Alatorre, J. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 30–50). Mérida: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Westport: Ablex Corporation.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.
Crockett, M. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 609–624.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
de Abreu, G. (1999). Learning mathematics in and outside of school: Two views on situated learning. In J. Bliss, R. Saljo, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 17–31). Oxford: Elsevier.
de Abreu, G., & Cline, T. (2007). Social valorization of mathematical practices: The implications for learners in multicultural schools. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 118–131). New York: Teachers College Press.
De Avila, E. (1988). Bilingualism, cognitive function and language minority group membership. In R. Cocking & J. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics (pp. 101–121). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2–3), 251–274.
Franke, M., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy (pp. 47–74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gutiérrez, R. (1995) xxx.
Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495–529.
Gutiérrez, R. (1998). Departments as contexts for understanding and reforming secondary teachers’ work: Continuing the dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 95–104.
Gutiérrez, R. (1999). Advancing urban Latina/o youth in mathematics: Lessons from an effective high school mathematics department. The Urban Review, 31(3), 263–281.
Gutiérrez, R. (2002a). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 145–187.
Gutiérrez, R. (2002b). Beyond essentialism: The complexity of language in teaching mathematics to Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1047–1088.
Gutiérrez, R. (2003). Beyond essentializing: The complex role of language in teaching Latina/o students mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1047–1088.
Gutiérrez, R. (2004). “So that’s what it means to teach urban Latina/o students quality mathematics”: A community of practice model of teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Gutiérrez, R. (2005). Organizing for advancement: Can teacher communities foster equity?. Plenary address, Annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, research pre-session, Los Angeles.
Gutiérrez, R. (2007a). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 356–364.
Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Embracing the inherent tensions in teaching mathematics from an equity stance. Democracy and Education, 18(3), 9–16.
Gutiérrez, R. (2011). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
Gutiérrez, R. (in press). Stand and deliver: The challenge of language in the study of mathematics. In Garcia, M. & Valdivia, A. (Eds.), Mapping Latina/Latino studies: An interdisciplinary reader. New York: Peter Lang.
Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). New York: Springer.
Gutiérrez, R., & Morales, H. (2002). Teacher community, socialization and biography in reforming mathematics. In V. Lee & A. Bryk (Eds.), Reforming Chicago’s high schools: Research perspectives on school and system level change (pp. 223–249). Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
Hedges, L., & Nowell, A. (1999). Changes in the Black–White gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of Education, 72(2), 111–135.
Hilliard, A. (2003). No mystery: Closing the achievement gap between Africans and excellence. In T. Perry, C. Steele, & A. Hilliard (Eds.), Young, gifted and black: Promoting high achievement among African American students (pp. 131–165). Boston: Beacon.
Khisty, L., & Viego, G. (1999). Challenging conventional wisdom: A case study. In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. de la Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 71–80). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). Making mathematics meaningful in multicultural contexts. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 126–145). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). But that’s just good teaching!: The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress towards equity? Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3–12.
Lubienski, S. (2008). On “gap gazing” in mathematics education: The need for gaps analyses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 350–356.
Lubienski, S., & Gutiérrez, R. (2008). Bridging the gaps in perspectives on equity in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 365–371.
Martin, D. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, D. (2007). Mathematics learning and participation in the African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 146–158). New York: Teachers College Press.
Miller, J., Hoffer, T., Sucher, R., Brown, K., & Nelson, C. (1992). LSAY code-book: Student, parent, and teacher data for 1992 cohort Two for longitudinal years one through four (1987–1991). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.
Morales, H. (2007). The underlife of a high school mathematics classroom: Mathematical meaning-making among Latino/a students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Moschkovich, J. (2007a). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 89–104). New York: Teachers College Press.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2001). Modeling with purpose: Mathematics as a critical tool. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 295–311). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nasir, N., & Cobb, P. (Eds.). (2007). Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
NRC. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school Students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reed, R., & Oppong, N. (2005). Looking critically at teachers’ attention to equity in their classrooms. The Mathematics Educator Monograph no. 1 (pp. 2–15).
Seeger, F., Voigt, J., & Waschescio, U. (Eds.). (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sherin, M., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183.
Siskin, L., & Little, J. (Eds.). (1995). The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 37–55). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stein, M., Silver, E., & Smith, M. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 17–52). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stodolsky, S., & Grossman, P. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227–249.
Talbert, J. (1995). Boundaries of teachers’ professional communities in U.S. High schools: Power and precariousness of the subject department. In L. Siskin & J. Little (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 68–94). New York: Teachers College Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zevenbergen, R. (2000). “Cracking the code” of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social, and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201–223). Westport: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context Matters: How Should We Conceptualize Equity in Mathematics Education?. In: Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., Pimm, D. (eds) Equity in Discourse for Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2812-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2813-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)