Skip to main content

Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Ethical integrity is a vital part of good scientific practice and publicly accountable research. This entry presents an overview of research ethics, examining its foundations, principles, common ethical dilemmas, misconduct policies and cases, and international ethics standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS). (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2011.

  • Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C., Crouch, R. A., Lie, R., Miller, F., & Wendler, D. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. (2007). Common morality (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrina, F. (2005). Scientific integrity (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1995). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2005). The ethics of research involving animals. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuremberg Code. (1947). Directives for human experimentation. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register, December 6, 2000, 65(235), 76260–76264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2003). From Baltimore to Bell labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10, 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2008). Fraud, fabrication, and falsification. In E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. Lie, F. Miller, & D. Wendler (Eds.), Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 787–794). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1994). Ethics of scientific research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swazey, J., Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 181, 542–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore statement. Available at: http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.

  • World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This entry is the work product of an employee or group of employees of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). The statements, opinions, and conclusions contained in the manuscript do not represent those of NIEHS, NIH, or the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Resnik J.D., Ph.D., NIEHS/NIH .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Resnik, D.B. (2014). Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_128

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_128

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2511-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2512-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics