Abstract
This chapter provides a content analysis of 1,453 articles published in Energy Policy from 1999 to 2008 involving 3,345 authors and 42,768 references. We selected Energy Policy because we believe the journal to be representative of the range of topics on energy policy research available in the field. The typical researcher who publishes in this journal is trained in science or economics, is affiliated with a university or research institute and was working within traditional disciplinary boundaries when their article was published. The most discussed technologies were all fossil-fuel-based and the most popular topic areas were energy markets, followed by climate change and projections of supply and demand. Of the articles that referenced other peer-reviewed articles or books, scientific journals were cited the most, followed by economics journals and Energy Policy articles. Social science and arts and humanities journals constituted less than five percent of all peer-reviewed citations. Based on this analysis, the authors of this section recommend that researchers consider using more alternative methods and topics in their contributions to the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also D’Agostino et al. (2011).
References
Archer, D., Pettigrew, T. F., & Aronson, E. (1992, October). Making research apply: High stakes public policy in a regulatory environment. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1233–1236.
D’Agostino, A. L., Sovacool, B. K., Trott, K., Regalado Ramos, C., Saleem, S., & Ong, Y. (2011). What’s the state of energy studies research? A content analysis of three leading journals from 1999 to 2008. Energy Policy, 36(1), 508–519.
Kempton, W., & Layne, L. L. (1994). The consumer’s energy analysis environment. Energy Policy, 22, 857–866.
Kempton, W., & Schipper, L. (1994). Expanding the human dimensions research agenda. Proceedings of the 1994 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings (pp. 1.85–1.90). Washington, DC: ACEEE.
Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. The Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 243–250.
Lutzenhiser, L. (1992). A cultural model of household energy consumption. Energy, 17(1), 47–60.
Lutzenhiser, L., & Shove, E. (1999). Contracting knowledge: The organizational limits to interdisciplinary energy efficiency research and development in the US and the UK. Energy Policy, 27, 217–227.
Macnamara, J. (2006). Media content analysis: Uses, benefits & best practice methodology. Sydney: Media Monitors.
McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London: Sage.
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Neuman, W. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Newbold, C., Boyd-Barrett, O., & Van Den Bulck, H. (2002). The media book. London: Arnold (Holder Headline).
Qu, M., Tahvanainen, L., Ahponen, P., & Palkonen, P. (2009). Bioenergy in China: Content analysis of news articles on Chinese professional internet platforms. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2300–2309.
Stern, P. C. (1986). Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn’t say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(2), 200–227.
Stern, P. C. (1993, June 25). A second environmental science: Human-environment interactions. Science, 260, 1897–1899.
Wilhite, H., Shove, E., Lutzenhiser, L., & Kempton, W. (2000). The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about individual behavior but next to nothing about demand. In E. Jochem (Ed.), Society, behavior, and climate change mitigation (pp. 109–126). New York: Kluwer.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the helpful suggestions and comments of Richard Hirsh from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and Barbara Farhar from the University of Colorado. Despite their assistance, all conclusions presented in this study and any errors therein are solely those of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sovacool, B.K., Saleem, S., D’Agostino, A.L., Ramos, C.R., Trott, K., Ong, Y. (2012). What About Social Science and Interdisciplinarity? A 10-Year Content Analysis of Energy Policy . In: Spreng, D., Flüeler, T., Goldblatt, D., Minsch, J. (eds) Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems. Environment & Policy, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2333-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2333-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2332-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2333-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)