Skip to main content

Farm Reform in Uzbekistan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cotton, Water, Salts and Soums

Abstract

Land-reform processes are catalyzing agricultural transition in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and this is well illustrated by the process of farm restructuring in Uzbekistan. In Khorezm, a region in the northwest of the country, this process is mirrored in the nationwide reforms: state-induced farm restructuring, state ownership of land, land reform to transfer land from collective to individual use, and continuation of area-based state targets for cotton at fixed prices. This study has the following two key objectives: (1) to explain how the land reform has changed the production structure in private farms, and (2) to describe the main changes in private farming during the reform process. The development of private farming since independence in 1991 has taken place in four phases, which are distinguished by the speed of reform, number and average size of farms, their structural specialization, and changes in the farms’ cropping pattern. In the first two phases, farm restructuring led to a downsizing of producing units and to many independent farmers in coexistence with the old farming system. In the following period, the old system was completely dismantled. The final and most recent phase, imposed by national policy, has reversed this trend, and farms were increased to sizes similar to those in Soviet times; many farmers had to give back their long-term lease contract. Although it was expected that sooner or later farms would have to be larger to obtain viable and sustainable production units, it is argued that changing farm size alone, without any other supportive structural measures, will not provide sufficient incentives for reaching economically efficient farm enterprises. Along all stages of the farm restructuring process, the setup of agricultural infrastructure did not change much, or if it did change, then by state-imposed initiatives, which is constraining the development of farms and sustainable farming systems and practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘private farm’ is used in this paper, as it is widely used among scientists for this type of farm in Uzbekistan. Lerman (2008b) refers to them as ‘peasant farms’.

  2. 2.

    The main differences between sovkhozes and kolkhozes were the larger size of the sovkhoz and the source of finance, which in the case of sovkhozes came directly from the state budget, while kolkhozes were self-financed.

  3. 3.

    In Uzbekistan, according to the procurement system, farmers are paid for raw cotton, while the cotton is exported as fiber. On the world market, there is in fact no price for raw cotton but only for cotton fiber, and it depends on quality.

References

  • Abdullaev I, Nurmetova F, Abdullaeva F, Lamers JPA (2008) Socio-technical aspects of water management in Uzbekistan: emerging water governance issues at the grass root level. In: Rahaman M, Varis O (eds) Central Asian water. Water & development publications. Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, pp 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T (1995) Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana. J Polit Econ 103(5):903–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch P (2002) Agrarian reform in Uzbekistan and other Central Asian countries. Working paper no. 49, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch P, Kutuzov A (2001) Rural factor market issues in the context of agrarian reform. Land Tenure Center, BASIS project, Statistical Compendium

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobojonov I (2009) Modeling crop and water allocation under uncertainty in irrigated agriculture: a case study on the Khorezm region, Uzbekistan. PhD dissertation, Bonn University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobojonov I, Lamers JPA, Djanibekov N, Ibragimov N, Begdullaeva T, Ergashev A, Kienzler K, Eshchanov R, Rakhimov A, Ruzimov J, Martius C (2011) Crop diversification in support of sustainable agriculture in Khorezm. In: Martius C, Rudenko I, Lamers JPA, Vlek PLG (eds) Cotton, water, salts and Soums: economic and ecological restructuring in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaki C, Nucifora A (2005) Ten years of transition in the agricultural sector: analysis and lessons from Eastern Europe and the former soviet union. In: Holt M, Chavas JP (eds) Essays in honor of Stanley R. Johnson. Berkeley Electronic Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty: improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. FAO and World Bank, Rome and Washington, DC, p 412

    Google Scholar 

  • Djanibekov N (2008) A micro-economic analysis of farm restructuring in Khorezm region, Uzbekistan. PhD dissertation, Bonn University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) The design of land consolidation pilot projects in Central and Eastern Europe. FAO Land Tenure Stud 6:55

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Uzbekistan (2007) Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Government of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni M, Raiser M, Crole-Rees A, Khidirov D (2005) Cotton taxation in Uzbekistan: opportunities for reform. ECSSD working paper no 41, Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu W (1997) Household land tenure reform in China: its impact on farming land use and agro-environment. Land Use Policy 14(3):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby H, Li G, Rozelle S (2002) Hazards of expropriation: tenure insecurity and investment in rural China. Am Econ Rev 92(5):1420–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan E, Lamers JPA, Eschanov R, Khamzina A (2008) Small-scale farmers’ perceptions and knowledge of tree intercropping systems in the Khorezm region of Uzbekistan. For Trees Livelihoods 18:355–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti D (2002) Agrarian reform, gender and land rights in Uzbekistan. Social policy and development paper no. 11, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, p 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof P (1990) Agroforestry in Africa: a survey of project experience. Panos Institute, London, p 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AR (2005) Land system, agriculture and poverty in Uzbekistan. University of California, Riverside, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (1998) Does land reform matter? Some experiences from the former Soviet Union. Eur Rev Agric Econ 25(3):307–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (1999) Land reform and farm restructuring: what has been accomplished to date? Am Econ Rev 89(2):271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (2005) The impact of land reform on rural household incomes in Transcaucasia and Central Asia. Discussion paper no. 9.05. Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Los Angeles, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (2008a) Agricultural development in Central Asia: a survey of Uzbekistan, 2007–2008. Eurasian Geogr Econ 49(4):481–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (2008b) Agricultural development in Uzbekistan: the effect of ongoing reforms. Discussion paper no. 7.08. Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Los Angeles, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z (2009) Land reform, farm structure, and agricultural performance in CIS countries. China Econ Rev 20:316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z, Csaki C, Feder G (2002) Land policies and evolving farm structures in Transition countries. Policy research working paper 2794. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 176

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman Z, Csaki C, Feder G (2004) Agriculture in transition, land policies and evolving farm structures in post-soviet countries. Lexington Books, Lanham, p 254

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller M (2006) A general equilibrium approach to modeling water and land use reforms in Uzbekistan. PhD dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef A (2001) Land tenure and soil conservation practices-evidence from West Africa and Southeast Asia. In: Stott DE, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GC (eds) Sustaining the global farm. Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, pp 125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyazmetov D (2008) Efficiency of the market Infrastructure development for farmers of the Khorezm region. MSc dissertation, Urgench State University, Urgench

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyazmetov D, Rudenko I, Lamers JPA (2011) Mapping and analyzing service provision for supporting agricultural production in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. In: Martius C, Rudenko I, Lamers JPA, Vlek PLG (eds) Cotton, water, salts and Soums: economic and ecological restructuring in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • OblStat (2008) Agricultural producers in Khorezm, Urgench

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret R (2000) Agrarian reform in Uzbekistan: why has the chinese model failed to deliver? Econ Dev Cult Chang 48(2):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret R (2007) Distortions to agricultural incentives in Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Agricultural distortions working paper 05, World Bank, Washington, DC, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle S, Swinnen J (2009) Political economy of agricultural distortions in transition countries of Asia and Europe. Agricultural distortions working paper 82, World Bank, Washington, DC, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenko I (2008) Value chains for rural and regional development: the case of cotton, wheat, fruit, and vegetable value chains in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya River, Uzbekistan. PhD dissertation, Hannover University, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenko I, Lamers J (2006) The comparative advantages of the present and future payment structure for agricultural producers in Uzbekistan. Central Asian J Manage Econ Soc 5(1–2):106–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanginov S, Nurmatov S, Sattorov J, Jumabekov E (2004) Livestock production in Central Asia: constraints and research opportunities. In: Ryan J, Vlek P, Paroda R (eds) Agriculture in Central Asia: research for development. ICARDA, Halab, pp 116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoor M, Visser O (2001) The state of agrarian reform in the former Soviet Union. Europe-Asia Stud 53(6):885–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleimenov M (2000) Trends in feed and livestock production during the transition period in three Central Asian countries. In: Babu S, Tashmatov A (eds) Food policy reforms in Central Asia: setting the research priorities. IFPRI, Washington, DC, pp 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen J, Mathijs E (1997) Agricultural privatization, land reform and farm restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: a comparative analysis. In: Swinnen J, Buckwell A, Mathijs E (eds) Agricultural privatization, Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot/Brookfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldwisch GJ (2008) Cotton, Rice & Water: transformation of Agrarian relations, irrigation technology and water distribution in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Dissertation, Bonn University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldwisch GJ, Mollinga P, Zavgorodnyaya D, Yalcin R (2011) Politics of agricultural water management in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. In: Martius C, Rudenko I, Lamers JPA, Vlek PLG (eds) Cotton, water, salts and Soums: economic and ecological restructuring in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegren S (1989) The half reform: Soviet agricultural policy and private agriculture, 1976–1989. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nodir Djanibekov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Djanibekov, N., Bobojonov, I., Lamers, J.P.A. (2012). Farm Reform in Uzbekistan. In: Martius, C., Rudenko, I., Lamers, J., Vlek, P. (eds) Cotton, Water, Salts and Soums. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1963-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics