Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sociology of Risk

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Risk Theory

Abstract

Risk is a relatively new object of sociological research, but this research field has grown rapidly over the last three decades. This chapter argues that the task of sociology is to contribute to risk research by emphasizing that risks are always situated in a social context and are necessarily connected to actors’ activities. Thus, sociology opposes the reification of risks, where risks are lifted out their social context and are dealt with as something uninfluenced by activities, technologies, and instruments that serve to map them. The chapter comprises four sections, the first being a general introduction. The next section presents a historical perspective on sociology and risk. It starts by briefly describing what sociology is, followed by a discussion of how the concept of risk becomes an object of sociological thought. The section ends by presenting and discussing three different sociological perspectives on risk, all providing different contributions. The third section focuses on current strands of sociological risk research. It starts by giving an overview of three different sociological approaches to risk: Mary Douglas’s cultural theory of social order, Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernization and the risk society, and Niklas Luhmann’s system theory. All three approaches conceptualize risk differently and make different contributions to the sociological study of risk. The review of these theories is followed by a presentation of five central discussions within the sociology of risk: risk governance, public trust, democracy and risk, the realism–constructivism debate, and governmentality and risk. Finally, the fourth section briefly presents some areas in need of further sociological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amendola A (2001) Recent paradigms for risk informed decision making. Safety Sci 40(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, Cave M (1999) Understanding regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (1993) Postmodern ethics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (2006) Liquid fear. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2002) A life of one’s own in a runaway world: individualization, globalization and politics. In: Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (eds) Individualization, institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage, London, pp 22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2008) Living in the world risk society. Econ Soc 35:329–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Losing the traditional. Individualization and “precarious freedom”. In: Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (eds) Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage, London, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff K, Walker G (2001) Public understandings of air pollution: the “localization” of environmental risk. Glob Environ Chang 11:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor D (1976) Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun C, Gerteis J, Moody J, Pfaff S, Virk I (2007) Contemporary sociological theory, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (1999) Risk, calculable and incalculable. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1966) Purity and danger. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1978) Cultural bias. Royal anthropological institute of Great Britain and Ireland, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1982) Introduction to grid/group analysis. In: Douglas M (ed) Essays in the sociology of perception. Routledge Kegan Paul, London, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1996) Thought styles: critical essays on good taste. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E (1982) The rules of sociological method. Macmillan Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson B (1993) The first formulation of sociology. A discursive innovation of the 18th century. Eur J Sociol 34(2):251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A (1767/1996) Essay on the history of civil society. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane M, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield T (2000) Gender, race and perceived risk: the “white male” effect. Health Risk Soc 2(2):159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, pp 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi F (2002) The culture of fear. Risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi F (2008) Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response. Soc policy adm 42(6):645–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1994) Risk, trust and reflexivity. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Polity, Cambridge, pp 184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1999) Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn TF (1999) Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldson A, Lidskog R, Wester-Herber M (2007) The battle for hearts and minds. Evolutions in organisational approaches to environmental risk communication. Environ Plann C 25(1):56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutteling J, Wiegman O (1996) Exploring risk communication. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner S (1992) The social construction of risk objects: or, how to pry open networks of risks. In: Short JF, Clarke L (eds) Organizations, uncertainties, and risk. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner S (2000) Science on stage: expert advice as public drama. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1651/2005) Leviathan. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Höijer B, Lidskog R, Uggla Y (2006) Facing dilemmas. Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity. Futures 38(3):350–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C, Rothstein H, Baldwin R (2001) The government of risk. Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Howel D, Moffatt S, Prince H, Bush J, Dunn C (2002) Urban air quality in North-East England: exploring the influences on local views and perceptions. Risk Anal 22(1):121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes E, Kitzinger J, Murdock G (2006) The media and risk. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 250–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter BM (2001) Regulation and risk. Occupational health and safety on the railways. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter B, Power M (eds) (2005) Organizational encounters with risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk. Coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36(2):299–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A, Michael M (2003) Science, social theory and public knowledge. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A, Wynne B (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger CC, Renn O, Rosa EA, Webler T (2001) Risk, uncertainty and rational action. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Japp KP, Kusche I (2008) System theory and risk. In: Zinn J (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 76–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (2005) Designs of nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory culture soc 27(2–3):233–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE (1992) The social amplification of risk: progess in developing an integrative framework of risk. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2):177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) Social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall H (2006) Crime and risk. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 76–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) (1992) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson R, Thomas J (eds) (1997) Science today: problem or crisis? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R (1996) In science we trust? on the relation between scientific knowledge, risk consciousness and public trust. Acta Sociologica 39(1):31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R (2008) Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. J risk res 11(1–2):69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R (2011) Regulating nature: public understanding and moral reasoning. Nature and Culture 6(2):149–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R, Sundqvist G (2011) The science-policy-citizen dynamics in international environmental governance. In: Lidskog R, Sundqvist G (eds) Governing the air: science-policy-citizen dynamics in international environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 323–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R, Soneryd L, Uggla Y (2005) Knowledge, power and control: studying environmental regulation in late modernity. J Environ Policy Plann 7(2):89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R, Soneryd L, Uggla Y (2009) Transboundary risk governance. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R, Uggla Y, Soneryd L (2011) Making transboundary risks governable: reducing complexity, constructing identities and ascribing capabilities. Ambio 40(2):111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt RE (2005) Risk management in post-trust societies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1984) Soziale systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a M

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1989) Ecological communication. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1993) Risk. A sociological theory. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton D (1999) Introduction: risk and sociocultural theory. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambrdge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres N (2007) The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Soc Stud Sci 37(5):759–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar J (1771) Observations concerning the distinctions of rank in society. T Ewing, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Novas C, Rose N (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Econ Soc 29(4):485–513

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P (2008) Risk and governmentality. In: Zinn JO (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 52–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) (2003) Social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (2007) Organized uncertainty. Designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith G (2009) Uncertain times: the notion of “risk” and the development of modernity. In: Löfstedt RE, Boholm Å (eds) The Earthscan reader on risk. Earthscan, London, pp 53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (1998) Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. J Risk Res 1(1):49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA (1998) Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. J Risk Res 1(1):15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N (1993) Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Econ Soc 22:283–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N (1996) Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In: Barry A, Osborne T, Rose N (eds) Foucault and political reason. UCL Press, London, pp 37–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N (1999) Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N, Miller P (1992) Political power beyond the states: problematics of government. Br J Sociol 43(2):173–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L (2000) Perceived risk and tampering with nature. J Risk Res 3(4):353–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1987) Perceptions of risk. Science 236:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Peters E (1998) The importance of worldviews in risk perception. Risk Decis Policy 3(2):165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776/2001) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nation. Random House International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr C (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165(3899):1232–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr N (2005) Knowledge politics. Governing the consequences of science and technology. Paradigm, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist G, Elam M (2010) Public involvement designed to circumvent public concern? The ‘participatory turn’ in European nuclear activities. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 1(4):203–229, Article 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) (2006) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Todt O (2003) Designing trust. Futures 35:239–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch J (1999) Fear of crime and the media: sociocultural theories of risk. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambrdge University Press, Cambridge, pp 34–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch J, Lupton D (2003) Risk and everyday life. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wester-Herber M (2004) Underlying concerns in land-use conflict: the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environ Sci Policy 7(2):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1992a) Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst Sci 1(3):281–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1992b) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2):111–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2(4):321–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1995) Public understanding of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Peterson JC, Pinch T (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 361–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S, Szerszynsky B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment modernity. Towards a new ecology. Sage, London, pp 44–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation. Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci cult 10(4):445–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (2005) Risk as globalizing ‘democratic’ discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens. Globalization and the challenge of engagement. ZED Books, London, pp 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (2010) Strange weather, again. Climate science as political art. Theor Cult Soc 27(2–3):289–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn JO (2008) A comparison of sociological theorizing on risk and uncertainty. In: Zinn JO (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 168–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn JO, Gooby-Taylor P (2006) Risk as an interdisciplinary research area. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Örebro University, Örebro, SE-701 82, Sweden

    Prof. Rolf Lidskog

  2. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, PB 1108 Blindern, Oslo, N-0317, Norway

    Prof. Göran Sundqvist

Authors
  1. Prof. Rolf Lidskog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Göran Sundqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Lidskog .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  2. Philosophy Department, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  3. Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    Rafaela Hillerbrand

  4. Department of Plant Physiology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Per Sandin

  5. Section for Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Martin Peterson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lidskog, R., Sundqvist, G. (2012). Sociology of Risk. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation