Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Precautionary Principle

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Risk Theory

Abstract

The precautionary principle has come to the fore in risk discourse. It calls for early measures to avoid and mitigate environmental damage and health hazards in the face of uncertainty. This paper reviews the history of and current research on the principle and suggests areas where further scrutiny is needed. The origin of the precautionary principle is traced back to three sources: (1) the general idea of precaution, (2) specific nonjudicial codes of conduct and arguments from precaution, and (3) law texts. Much of the current theoretical study has been concerned with analysis of different aspects of the precautionary principle and with assessment of specific versions of the principle in different regulatory contexts. Issues related to terminology, to basic structure shared by different formulations of the principle, and to the distinction between strong and weak interpretations are considered. Discussion on different versions of the precautionary principle as (1) rules of choice, (2) procedural requirements, and (3) epistemic rules or principles is briefly revisited. General arguments leveled at the principle are spelled out. Despite the attention the precautionary principle has received in academic literature, there remain areas of research which deserve more thorough scrutiny. Formal methods of inquiry have been insufficiently utilized. Topics which deserve further study include the normative underpinnings of the principle, the status of the principle in scientific risk analysis, and the principle’s relationship with stakeholder/public engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams MD (2002) The precautionary principle and the rhetoric behind it. J Risk Res 5:301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahteensuu M (2007) Defending the precautionary principle against three criticisms. Trames J Humanit Soc Sci 11(4):366–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky D (1991) Scientific uncertainty and the precautionary principle. Environment 33(7):4–5, 43–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer-Christiansen S (1994) The precautionary principle in Germany: enabling government. In: O’Riordan T, Cameron J (eds) Interpreting the precautionary principle. Cameron May, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J, Wade-Gery W (1995) Addressing uncertainty: law, policy and the development of the precautionary principle. In: Dente B (ed) Environmental policy in search of new instruments. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr S (2002) Ethical and value-based aspects of the European Commission’s precautionary principle. J Agric Environ Ethics 15:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2000) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle (Brussels, 2 Feb 2000 COM[2000]1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm A, Clarke HR (1993) Natural resource management and the precautionary principle. In: Dommen E (ed) Fair principles for sustainable development: essays on environmental policy and developing countries. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock G (2000) Are the policy implications of the precautionary principle coherent? AgBioWorld 2000. http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&newsid=134. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Conko G (2003) Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 12:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPB (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) (2000) Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranor CF (2003) What could precautionary science be? Research for early warnings and a better future. In: Tickner J (ed) Precaution, environmental science, and preventive public policy. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sadeleer N (2002) Environmental principles: from political slogans to legal rules. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sadeleer N (ed) (2006) Implementing the precautionary principle: approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. http://reports.eea.eu.int/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/en/Issue_Report_No_22.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Fisher E (2001) Is the precautionary principle justiciable? J Environ Law 13(3):315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher E, Harding R (1999) The precautionary principle: towards a deliberative, transdisciplinary problem-solving process. In: Harding R, Fisher E (eds) Perspectives on the precautionary principle. Federation, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice M (2009) Contemporary issues in international environmental law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster K, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000) Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288:979–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone D, Hey E (eds) (1996) The precautionary principle and international law: the challenge of implementation. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner SM (2006) A core precautionary principle. J Polit Philos 14(1):33–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard O (1997) Introduction générale. In: Godard O (ed) Le principe de précaution dans la conduite des affaires humaines. MSH et INRA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goklany IM (2000) Applying the precautionary principle in a broader context. In: Morris J (ed) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 189–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Goklany IM (2001) The precautionary principle: a critical appraisal of environment risk assessment. Cato Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein B, Carruth RS (2004) The precautionary principle and/or risk assessment in world trade organization decisions: a possible role for risk perception. Risk Anal 24(2):491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin RE (1980) No moral nukes. Ethics 90:417–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JD, Hsia S (2002) Europe’s precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls. J Risk Res 5(4):371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS, Bewers M (1996) Towards a scientific definition of the precautionary principle. Mar Pollut Bull 32(11):768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (1997) The limits of precaution. Found Sci 2(2):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J, Holm S (2002) Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox. J Med Philos 27(3):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann H (1994) Precautionary legal duties and principles of modern international environmental law: the precautionary principle: international environmental law between exploitation and protection. International Environmental Law and Policy Series, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm S, Harris J (1999) Precautionary principle stifles discovery. Nature 400:398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2006) How not to criticize the precautionary principle? J Med Philos 31:447–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K (2002) The moral foundation of the precautionary principle. J Agric Environ Ethics 15:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, O’Riordan T (1999) The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policy and politics. In: Raffensberger C, Tickner J (eds) Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M (2006) The precautionary principle, Swedish chemicals policy and sustainable development. J Risk Res 9(4):337–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke A, Renn O, Dreyer M, Losert C (2009) Project outline and conceptual considerations for a general model of precautionary risk regulation. In: Renn O, Schweizer P-J, Müller-Herold U, Stirling A (eds) Precautionary risk appraisal and management: an orientation for meeting the precautionary principle in the European Union. Europäische Hochschulverlag, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx/Houghton-Mifflin Co., Boston. The Riverside Press, Cambridge (Reprinted University of Chicago Press 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemons J, Shrader-Frechette K, Cranor C (1997) The precautionary principle: scientific uncertainty and type I and type II errors. Found Sci 2:207–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow L, Carr S, Wield D (2005) European Union regulation of agri-biotechnology: precautionary links between science, expertise and policy. Sci Public Policy 32(4):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt RE, Fischhoff B, Fischhoff IR (2002) Precautionary principles: general definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms. J Policy Anal Manage 21(3):381–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace PM, Sissenwine MP (2002) Coping with uncertainty: evolution of the relationship between science and management. In: Berkson JM, Kline LL, Orth DJ (eds) Incorporating uncertainty into fishery models. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson NA (1999) The precautionary principle, the catastrophe argument, and Pascal’s wager. J Ends Means 4:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson NA (2002) Formulating the precautionary principle. Environ Ethics 24:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH (1997) If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop breaking it! Found Sci 2:263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascher S (1997) Taking a ‘precautionary approach’: fisheries management in New Zealand. Environ Plan Law J 14:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller HI, Conko G (2000) Genetically modified fear and the international regulation of biotechnology. In: Morris J (ed) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 84–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Declaration of the Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (London, 25 Nov 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Declaration of the Third International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (The Hague, 8 Mar 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region (Bergen, 16 May 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris J (2000) Defining the precautionary principle. In: Morris J (ed) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Munthe C (2011) The price of precaution and the ethics of risk. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myers NJ (2006) Introduction. In: Myers NJ, Raffensperger C (eds) Precautionary tools for reshaping environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhr AI, Traavik T (2003) Genetically modified (GM) crops: precautionary science and conflicts of interests. J Agric Environ Ethics 16:227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollkaemper A (1996) ‘What you risk reveals what you value’ and other dilemmas encountered in the legal assaults on risks. In: Freestone D, Hey E (eds) The precautionary principle and international law: the challenge of implementation. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan T, Cameron J, Jordan A (eds) (2002) Reinterpreting the precautionary principle. Cameron May, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrega Vicuña F (1999) The changing international law of high seas fisheries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff D (1999) The precautionary principle as a screening device. In: Raffensberger C, Tickner J (eds) Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker J (1998) Precautionary principle. In: Chadwick R (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ethics, vol 3. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW et al (1980) The preconditions for achieving consensus in the context of technological risk. In: Dierkes M, Edwards S, Coppock R (eds) Technological risk: its perception and handling in the European Community. Gunn & Hain, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C (1991) Reserved rationality and the precautionary principle. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M (2003) Transformative decision rules. Erkenntnis 58:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M (2006) The precautionary principle is incoherent. Risk Anal 26(3):595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M (2007) Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs? J Med Ethics 33(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffensberger C, Barrett K (2001) In defense of the precautionary principle. Nature Biotechnol 19:811–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall A (2011) Risk and precaution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz J (2004) The post-normal science of precaution. Futures 36:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ready RC, Bishop RC (1991) Endangered species and the safe minimum standard of conservation. Am J Agric Econ 72(2):309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik DB (2003) Is the precautionary principle unscientific? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 34:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers MD (2001) Scientific and technological uncertainty, the precautionary principle, scenarios and risk management. J Risk Res 4(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (1999) Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:889–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (2004a) Better safe than sorry: applying philosophical methods to the debate on risk and the precautionary principle. Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology (Academic dissertation), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (2004b) The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution. Environ Values 13:461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (2006) A paradox out of context: Harris and Holm on the precautionary principle. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 15(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (2007) Common-sense precaution and varieties of the precautionary principle. In: Lewens T (ed) Risk: philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P, Peterson M, Hansson SO, Rudén C, Juthe A (2002) Five charges against the precautionary principle. J Risk Res 5:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saner M (2002) An ethical analysis of the precautionary principle. Int J Biotechnol 4(1):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule E (2002) Assessing the precautionary principle in the regulation of genetically modified organisms. Int J Biotechnol 4(1):18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr C (2003) The precautionary principle versus risk analysis. Risk Anal 23(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner J (2003) Precautionary assessment: a framework for integrating science, uncertainty, and preventative policy. In: Tickner J (ed) Precaution, environmental science, and preventive public policy. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker C (1996) State responsibility and the precautionary principle. In: Freestone D, Hey E (eds) The precautionary principle and international law: the challenge of implementation. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2002) Evolution and status of the precautionary principle in international law. Kluwer Law International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner D, Hartzell L (2004) The lack of clarity in the precautionary principle. Environ Values 13:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCED Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1982) World charter for nature: United Nations General Assembly (Resolution 37/7). UNEP, Nairobi, 28 Oct 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderZwaag D (2002) The precautionary principle and marine environmental protection: slippery shores, rough seas, and rising normative tides. Ocean Dev Int Law 33:165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schomberg R (2006) The precautionary principle and its normative challenges. In: Fisher E, Jones J, von Schomerg R (eds) Implementing the precautionary principle: perspectives and prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 19–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside KH (2006) Precautionary politics: principle and practice in confronting environmental risk. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener JB, Rogers MD (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. J Risk Res 5:317–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1996) But is it true? A citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (1998), Racine, WI, 26 Jan 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public Choice Research Centre (PCRC), University of Turku, Publicum, Assistentinkatu 7, 20014, Turku, Finland

    Dr. Marko Ahteensuu

  2. Department of Plant Physiology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7080, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden

    Dr. Per Sandin

Authors
  1. Dr. Marko Ahteensuu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Per Sandin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Ahteensuu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  2. Philosophy Department, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  3. Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    Rafaela Hillerbrand

  4. Department of Plant Physiology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Per Sandin

  5. Section for Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Martin Peterson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ahteensuu, M., Sandin, P. (2012). The Precautionary Principle. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation