Abstract
Developing a leadership for learning capability throughout a system where schools exercise considerable autonomy challenges policymakers to work with principals and researchers to develop coherent approaches. This chapter outlines the shift in New Zealand from a focus on the principal as the school chief executive, to a current focus on the principal’s pivotal role in leadership of the ways teachers work together to improve student learning. Instrumental in this shift has been the development of a leadership framework that is owned by principals as well as policymakers, underpinned by a best evidence synthesis of the relationship of school leadership and student outcomes. This work has also led to a powerful new tool for schools to use in reviewing their school leadership, as well as informing policymakers about the overall school leadership capability in New Zealand. These developments hold considerable promise, so long as the policy emphasis on capability and joint work can be maintained, and supported rather than undermined by changes in school accountability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, C. (2009). The New Zealand principal’s experience of the school board as employer. Auckland, New Zealand: School Governance Solutions. www.sgsl.co.nz.
Cardno, C. (1999). Appraisal policy and implementation issues for New Zealand schools. The International Journal of Educational Administration, 13(2), 87–97.
Chapman, P. (2008). In search of effective principal appraisal (M.Ed thesis, Victoria University, Wellington).
Elmore, R. F. (2008). Leadership as the practice of improvement. In B. Pont, D. Nusche, & H. Moorman (Eds.), Improving school leadership (Case studies on system leadership, Vol. 2, pp. 37–67). Paris: OECD.
Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When schools compete. A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Fitzgerald, T., Youngs, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2003). Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy? Performance management in New Zealand schools. School Leadership and Management, 23(1), 91–105.
Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave? The Knowledge Society and the future of education. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
Goren, P. (2009). How policy travels: Making sense of Ka Hikitia – Managing for Success: the Mäori Education Strategy 2008–2012. Wellington, New Zealand: Fulbright New Zealand.
Hattie, J. (2009). Horizons and Whirlpools: The well-travelled road of national standards. Cognition Institute, Auckland. www.cognitioninstitute.org/files/docs/horizons-whirlpools-the-well-travelled-pathway-of-national-standards.pdf
House of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee. (2010). School accountability. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
Langley, J. (Ed.). (2009). Tomorrow’s schools 20 years on. Auckland: Cognition Institute. www.cognitioninstitute.org.
Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644.
Lee, J. (2010). Trick or treat: New ecology of education accountability system in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 73–93.
Ministry of Education. (2007). New Zealand country report on improving school leadership. OECD Background Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Ka Hikitia. Managing for Success. Ma-ori Education Strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Kiwi Leadership for Principals. Principals as educational leaders. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Effective governance. Working in partnership. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Office of the Auditor-General. (2008). Ministry of Education Monitoring and supporting boards of trustees. Wellington, New Zealand: Office of the Auditor-General.
Piggott-Irvine, E., & Youngs, H. (in press). Aspiring principals development programme evaluation in New Zealand: What made it work? Journal of Educational Administration.
Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership (Policy and practice, Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.
Robinson, V. M. J., Irving, S. E., Eddy, D., & Le Fevre, D. (2008). Capability in the leadership of teaching and learning in New Zealand. In M. Brundett & M. Crawford (Eds.), Developing school leaders – An international perspective (pp. 155–172). London: Routledge.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Stoop, G. (2009). ERO Priorities for 2009. Secondary Principals Association of New Zealand Symposium, Auckland.
Sunderman, G. (Ed.). (2008). Holding NCLB accountable. Achieving accountability, equity, and school reform. Thousand Oask, CA: Corwin Press.
Thomas, S., & Watson, L. (2011). Quality and accountability: Policy tensions for Australian school leaders. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 189–208). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2010). Standards and quality in English primary schools over time: The national evidence. In R. Alexander, C. Doddington, J. Gray, L. Hargreaves, & R. Kershner (Eds.), The Cambridge primary review research surveys. London: Routledge.
Wylie, C. (2007). School governance in New Zealand: How is it working? Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Wylie, C. (2009). Getting more from school self-management. In J. Langley (Ed.), Tomorrow’s schools 20 years on… (pp. 135–146). Auckland, New Zealand: Cognition Institute.
Wylie, C. (2010). Principal vacancies and appointments 2008–2009. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Wylie, C. (2011, forthcoming). New Zealand: Challenges around capability improvements in a system of self-managed schools. San Francisco: WestEd. Available at http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/turnaround-policy-FINAL.pdf.
Wylie, C. & Hodgen, E. (2010). Educational leadership practices survey baseline 2009 overall profile for the Experienced Principals’ Development programme schools. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Wyse, D., McCreery, E., & Torrance, H. (2010). The trajectory and impact of national reform: Curriculum and assessment in English primary schools. In R. Alexander, C. Doddington, J. Gray, L. Hargreaves, & R. Kershner (Eds.), The Cambridge primary review research surveys. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wylie, C. (2011). The Development of Leadership Capability in a Self-Managing Schools System: The New Zealand Experience and Challenges. In: Townsend, T., MacBeath, J. (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1349-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1350-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)