Skip to main content

Weyl’s Principle, Cosmic Time and Quantum Fundamentalism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation

Part of the book series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ((PSEP,volume 2))

Abstract

We examine the necessary physical underpinnings for setting up the cosmological standard model with a global cosmic time parameter. In particular, we discuss the role of Weyl’s principle which asserts that cosmic matter moves according to certain regularity requirements. After a brief historical introduction to Weyl’s principle we argue that although the principle is often not explicitly mentioned in modern standard texts on cosmology, it is implicitly assumed and is, in fact, necessary for a physically well-defined notion of cosmic time. We finally point out that Weyl’s principle might be in conflict with the wide-spread idea that the universe at some very early stage can be described exclusively in terms of quantum theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Charis Anastopoulos, “Frequently asked questions about decoherence”, in: International Journal of Theoretical Physics 41, 2002, pp. 1573-1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Belot, “Dust, Time, and Symmetry”, in: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, 2005, pp. 255-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvio Bergia and Lucia Mazzoni, “Genesis and evolution of Weyl’s reflections on de Sitter’s universe”, in: Hubert Goenner et al (Eds.), The expanding worlds of general relativity. Basel: Birkhüuser 1999, pp. 325-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman Bondi, Cosmology (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis Dieks, “Becoming, Relativity and Locality”, in Dennis Dieks (Ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2006, pp. 157-176.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Ehlers, “Contributions to the Relativistic Mechanics of Continuous Media” (1961), translated in: General Relativity and Gravitation 25, 1993, pp. 1225-1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Ehlers, “Editorial note to: H. Weyl, On the general relativity theory”, in: General Relativity and Gravitation 41, 2009, pp. 1655-1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George F. R. Ellis, “Innovation, resistance and change: the transition to the expanding universe”, in: Bruno Bertotti et al (Eds.), Modern cosmology in retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990, pp. 97-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • George F. R. Ellis, “Contributions of K. Gödel to relativity and cosmology”, in: Petr Hajek (Ed.), Gödel ’96: Lecture notes in logic 6. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1996, pp. 325-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • George F. R. Ellis, “83 years of general relativity and cosmology: progress and problems”, in: Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, 1999, pp. A37-A75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen W. Hawking and George F. R. Ellis, The large scale structure of spacetime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1973.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander Friedman, “On the Curvature of Space” (1922), reprinted in: General Relativity and Gravitation 31, 1999, pp. 1991-2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert Goenner, “Weyl’s contributions to cosmology”, in Erhard Scholtz (Ed.) Hermann Weyl’s Raum – Zeit – Materie and a general introduction to his scientific work. Basel: Birkhäuser 2001, pp. 105-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt Gödel, “A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy” in: Paul A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1949, pp. 555-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erich Joos et al (Eds.) Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Berlin: Springer 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus Kiefer and Erich Joos, “Decoherence: Concepts and examples”, in: Philippe Blanchard and Arkadiusz Jadczyk (Eds.), Quantum future. Berlin: Springer 1999, pp. 105-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrzej Krasinski, Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaas P. Landsman, “Between classical and quantum”, in: Jeremy Butterfield and John Earman (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2: Philosophy of Physics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006, pp. 417-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • David B. Malament, “Classical general relativity”, in: Jeremy Butterfield and John Earman (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2: Philosophy of Physics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006, pp. 417-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, John A. Wheeler, Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayant V. Narlikar, An Introduction to Cosmology. Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • John D. North, The measure of the universe – A history of modern cosmology. New York: Dover 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip J. Peebles, Principles of physical cosmology. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amal K. Raychaudhuri, Theoretical Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard P. Robertson, “Relativistic Cosmology”, in: Reviews of Modern Physics 5, 1933, pp. 62-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svend E. Rugh and Henrik Zinkernagel, “On the physical basis of cosmic time”, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40, 2009, pp. 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert M. Wald, General Relativity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann Weyl, “On the general relativity theory” (1923), reprinted in: General Relativity and Gravitation 41, 2009, pp. 1661-1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann Weyl, “Redshift and Relativistic Cosmology”, in: The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 9, 1930, pp. 936-943.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank audiences at talks in Copenhagen, Dortmund, Granada, Heidelberg, Leeds, Oxford, and Utrecht for helpful comments. We also thank George Ellis and Erhard Scholz for comments on the manuscript. We finally thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project FFI2008-06418-C03-02) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. E. Rugh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rugh, S.E., Zinkernagel, H. (2011). Weyl’s Principle, Cosmic Time and Quantum Fundamentalism. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., Weber, M. (eds) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics