Skip to main content

New Forest Owners – Small-Scale Forestry and Changes in Forest Ownership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on People and Forests

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 9))

Abstract

Families and individuals own 82% of the European private forest area (data derived from 11 countries). These forests are typically small in scale and are increasing in number as a result of fragmentation. Coincident with these developments is a change in the ownership structure. In the past owners were typically farmers who lived close to their forest, and who relied on their forests for income. In recent decades, the number of non-farmer owners has increased and many now live in urban areas. The new owners tend not to be economically dependent on their forests, nor have timber production as a primary goal, and are instead likely to hold amenity and conservation objectives. This trend, coupled with the increasing fragmentation of small-scale forests, is likely to have negative consequences for timber supply and the sustainable management of these forests. The changing objectives of owners may, on the other hand, have positive impacts on landscape, nature conservation and recreation. However, these may be counteracted by increasing fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Hungary, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, United Kingdom.

  2. 2.

    Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain.

References

  • Anon (2006) Background information. Workshop on pan-European recommendations for afforestation and reforestation in the context of UNFCCC. http://www.mcpfe.org/documents/meetings/2006/unf. Accessed 28 Jan 2009

  • Bauer J, Kniivilä M, Schmithüsen F (2004) Forest legislation in Europe: how 23 countries approach the obligation to reforest, public access and use of non-wood forest products. FAO, Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper 37, FAO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Best C (2002) America’s private forest – challenges for conservation. J Forest 100(3):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ (2004) An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners. Scand J Forest Res 19(4):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church A, Ravenscroft N (2008) Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy 25:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004) Terms and definitions. FRA-2005. FRA working paper 73, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2005) Global forest resource assessment. Main Report. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly N (2007) The farm forest resource in Ireland: opportunities and challenges. Small-scale Forestry 6(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Herbohn J, Niskanen A (2002) Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: what’s in a name? Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 1(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms JA (1998) The dictionary of forestry. Society of American Foresters and CABI Publishing, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn J (2006) Small-scale forestry: is it simply a smaller version of industrial (large-scale) multiple use forestry? In: Wall S (ed) Small-scale forestry and rural development, the intersection of ecosystems, economics and society. Proceedings IUFRO 3.08 Conference, Galway, Ireland. COFORD and GMIT, Ireland, pp 158–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F, Korotkov A, Wilnhammer M (2007) Private forest ownership in Europe. Unasylva 58:3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G (2005) What is new about forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(3):352–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugosson M, Ingermarson F (2004) Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fenn 38(2):271–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyttinen P (2001) Prospects for small-scale forestry in Europe. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyttinen P (2004) Small-scale forestry. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist J (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 663–666

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyttinen P, Ottitsch A, Pelli A et al (eds) (1999) Forest related resources, industries, services and know-how in the border regions of the European Union. EFI working paper 21. EFI, Joensuu

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SM, van Putten IE (2006) Typology of non-industrial private forest owners in Tasmania. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 5(1):37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Jylhä L (2007) Forest management associations – value from cooperation for forest owners. Unasylva 58:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn 32(1):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply. Forest Sci 42(3):300–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvarda ME (2004) Non-agricultural forest owners’ in Austria – a new type of ownership. Forest Policy Econ 6:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillandt M (2001) Forest management association – a major tool to promote economic sustainability of family forestry. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Luloff A, Finley J, Melbye J (2000) Social issues and impacts associated with land parcelisation. In: DeCoster D (ed) Proceedings of forestry fragmentation 2000: sustaining private forests in the 21st century. Sampson Group, Alexandria, pp 183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty TD, Kurtz WB, Gramann JH (1988) PNIF owner attitudes in the Midwest: a case study in Missouri and Wisconsin. North J Appl For 5(3):194–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizaraite D, Mizaras S (2005) The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economy in transition: observations from Lithuania. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(4):437–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Dhubháin Á, Gallagher R, Whelton A, Wiley S (2005) Forest sector entrepreneurship in Europe: Ireland. Acta Silvatica Lignaria Hungarica Special Ed 1:347–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Dhubháin Á, Greene R (2009) How much do Irish private forest owners know about forestry? Small-scale For. doi: doi: 10.1007/s11842-009-9081-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Dhubháin Á, Wall S (1999) The new owners of small private forests in Ireland. J Forest 97(6):28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripatti P (1996) Factors affecting partitioning of private forest holdings in Finland. A logit analysis. Acta Forestalia Fennica 252:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripatti P, Järveläinen VP (1997) Forecasting structural changes in non-industrial private forest ownership in Finland. Scand Forest Econ 36:215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F (2008) Private forest ownership in Europe-advance draft. Geneva timber and forest discussion paper 49. FAO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraml U (2004) Rise and fall of programmatic approaches in German small-scale forest owner research. In: International symposium on contributions of family-farm enterprises to sustainable rural development, Proceedings, Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Berichte, Heft 51, Freiburg, pp 80–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekot W (2001) Analysis of profitability of small-scale farm forestry (SSFF) by means of a forest accountancy data network – Austrian experiences and results. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Skov-og Naturstyrelsen (1993) Vejledning om naturbeskyttelsesloven – udgivet 1993. Kapitel 10.7 Særligt om privatejede skove

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen R, Järvinen E, Lindross K, Rämö A (2005) The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: the Estonia and Finland cases. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(4):451–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Uliczka H, Angelstam P, Gunnar J, Anders B (2004) Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scand J Forest Res 19(3):274–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg JD, Wiersum KF (1996) Styles of forest management by small forest owners, characteristics and scope for rural development. In: Glück P, Weiss G (eds) Forestry in the context of rural development: future research needs. EFI proceedings 15. EFI, Joensuu, pp 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, O’Leary T (2004) Landowners’ perspectives on the future of rural Europe: consequences for farm forestry. In: International symposium on contributions of family-farm enterprises to sustainable rural development, Proceedings, Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Berichte, Heft 51, Freiburg, pp 105–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA (2005) Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: characteristics and future potential. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudelman M, Leaky JM (2000) The graying of farmers. Population reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2000/TheGrayingofFarmers.aspx. Accessed 20 April 2009

  • Ziegenspeck S, Härdter U, Schraml U (2004) Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change. Forest Policy Econ 6:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Áine Ní Dhubháin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dhubháin, Á.N. (2011). New Forest Owners – Small-Scale Forestry and Changes in Forest Ownership. In: Ritter, E., Dauksta, D. (eds) New Perspectives on People and Forests. World Forests, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1150-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics