Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New ICMI Study Series ((NISS,volume 14))

Abstract

Despite its importance for the discipline, the statistical investigation cycle is given little attention in schools. Teachers face unique challenges in teaching statistical inquiry, with elements unfamiliar to many mathematics classrooms: Coping with uncertainty, encouraging debate and competing interpretations, and supporting student collaboration. This chapter highlights ways for teacher educators to support teachers’ learning to teach statistical inquiry. Results of two longitudinal studies are used to formulate recommendations to develop teachers’ proficiency in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allmond, S., & Makar, K. (2010). Developing primary students’ ability to pose questions in statistical investigations. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Ljubljana, Slovenia: International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Anderson, J. (2005). Implementing problem solving in mathematics classrooms: What support do teachers want? In A. D. P. Clarkson, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Building Connections: Theory, Research and Practice (Vol. 1, pp. 89–96). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. (2008a, July). What about the P in the PPDAC cycle? An initial look at posing questions for statistical investigation. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Congress of Mathematics Education (ICME-11), Monterrey, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. (2008b). Developing new statistical content knowledge with secondary school mathematics teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2009). The shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcárate, P., Serrado, A., Cardeñoso, J., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Paparistodemou, E. (2008). An online professional environment to improve the teaching of statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds.) (2008). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Borasi, R. (1992). Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A., Krajcik, J. S., & Marx, R. W. (1998). Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. (2007). Developments in promoting the improvement of statistical education. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute 56th Session. Lisbon, Portugal: International Statistical Institute. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • EarlyStatistics Consortium. (2008). EarlyStatistics: A teacher professional development course in statistics education. Thessaloniki: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2010). Linking problems, conclusions and evidence: Primary students’ early experiences of planning statistical investigations. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Ljubljana, Slovenia: International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Finzer, W. (2005). Fathom dynamic data software. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, R., & Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Online: www.amstat.org/Education/gaise/

  • Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, S., & Doig, B. (2004). Progressive discourse in mathematics classes: The task of the teacher. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fluglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. II, pp. 495–502). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, C., Kaput, J., & Goldsmith, L. (1992). Authentic inquiry into data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. (2007). Is constructivism risky? Social anxiety, classroom participation, competitive game play and constructivist preferences in teacher development. Teacher Development, 11(3), 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, N. C., & Lajoie, S. P. (2007). Statistical reasoning of middle school children engaged in survey inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 630–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. (2008). A model of learning to teach statistical inquiry. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. (2010). Teaching primary teachers to teach statistical inquiry: The uniqueness of initial experiences. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Ljubljana, Slovenia: International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2002). Comparing two distributions: Investigating secondary teachers’ statistical thinking. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Cape Town, South Africa: International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistics Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., et al. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., Mavrotheris, E., Azcárate, P., Serrado, A., & Cardeñoso, J. (2008a). Teachers’ professional development in statistics: The EarlyStatistics European project. In C. Batanero, G. Burill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., Mavrotheris, E., & Stav, J. B. (2008b). EarlyStatistics: Pedagogical framework. Thessaloniki: EarlyStatistics Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorto, M. A. (2006). Identifying content knowledge for teaching statistics. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Salvador, Brazil. International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2008). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). Online: docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/

  • Watson, J. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C. J. (1994). Embracing the ‘wider view’ of statistics. American Statistician, 48(2), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research and writing was funded by the Australian Council for Research (LP0776703), Education Queensland, and The University of Queensland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Makar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Makar, K., Fielding-Wells, J. (2011). Teaching Teachers to Teach Statistical Investigations. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics