Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New ICMI Study Series ((NISS,volume 14))

Abstract

The education of statistics teachers should be based on adequate models for pedagogical knowledge that guide the teachers’ educators in implementing and assessing the training of teachers. In this chapter, some models that are relevant for mathematics and statistics are analysed, and a new framework that complements the previously described models is proposed. The different facets and levels that should be taken into account when educating mathematics and statistics teachers are highlighted. Some implications for the training of teachers are presented and a formative cycle directed to increase the teachers’ statistical and pedagogical knowledge simultaneously is briefly described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds.). (2008). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Burgess, T. A. (2008). Teacher knowledge for teaching statistics through investigations. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students’ statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 375–396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Preparing school teachers to develop students’ statistical reasoning. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., Roa, R., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2008). Assessing and developing pedagogical content and statistical knowledge of primary school teachers through project work. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Bencomo, D. (2005). Suitability criteria of a mathematical instruction process: A teaching experience of the function notion. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, A., & Tirosh, D. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 117–132). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P. (2008). Preparing teachers to meet the challenges of statistics education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practice. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research of the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 461–494). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Towards a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 321–354). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–223). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (2001). Profiling teachers’ competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., Callingham, R. A., & Donne, J. M. (2008). Establishing PCK for teaching statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (Ed.). (2008). The international handbook of mathematics teacher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research supported by the projects: SEJ2007-60110/EDUC. MCYT-FEDER and EDU2010-14947, MICIIN-FEDER.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan D. Godino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Godino, J.D., Ortiz, J.J., Roa, R., Wilhelmi, M.R. (2011). Models for Statistical Pedagogical Knowledge. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics