Abstract
The importance of reflective metacognitive activity during mathematical modelling activity has been recognised by scholars and researchers over the years. The metacognitive activity (or lack of it) of secondary students associated with transitions between stages in the modelling process – especially in relation to the identification and release of blockages to progress – is considered. Productive metacognitive acts are identified as occurring at three levels. Routine metacognition together with metacognitive responses to Goos’ red flag situations are elaborated together with the notion of meta-metacognition being engaged in by teachers trying to foster students’ development of independent modelling competencies especially their metacognitive competencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blum, W., & Kaiser, G. (1984). Analysis of applications and of conceptions for an application oriented mathematics instruction. In J. S. Berry, D. N. Burghes, I. D. Huntley, D. J. G. James, & A.O. Moscardini (Eds.), Teaching and applying mathematical modelling (pp. 201–214). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Borromeo Ferri, R. (2007). Modelling problems from a cognitive perspective. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 260–270). Chichester: Horwood.
Carlson, R.A., Khoo, B. H., Yaure, R. G., & Schneider, W. (1990). Acquisition of a problem-solving skill: Levels of organisation and use of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 193–214.
Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 517–526.
Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgements, and their interactions. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Efklides, A., Kiorpelidou, K., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2006). Worked-out examples in mathematic: Effects on performance and metacognitive experiences. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 11–33). New York: Nova Science.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Edwards, I. (2007). Facilitating middle secondary modelling competencies. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 130–140). Chichester: Horwood.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.
Goos, M. (1998). ‘I don’t know if I’m doing it right or I’m doing it wrong!’ unresolved uncertainty in the collaborative learning of mathematics. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times. (Proceedings of the Twenty-first annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (Vol. 1, pp. 225–232). Gold Coast: MERGA.
Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behaviour. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Maaß, K. (2007). Modelling in class: What do we want the students to learn? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 63–78). Chichester: Horwood.
Oke, K. H., & Bajpai, A. C. (1986). Formulation – Solution processes in mathematical modelling. In J. S. Berry, D. N. Burghes, I. D. Huntley, D. J. G. James, & A. O. Moscardini (Eds.), Mathematical modeling methodology, models and micros (pp. 61–79). Chichester: Ellis Horwood & Wiley.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Stillman, G.A. (1998). The emperor’s new clothes? Teaching and assessment of mathematical applications at the senior secondary level. In P. Galbraith, W. Blum, G. Booker, & I. D. Huntley (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Teaching and assessment in a technology-rich world (pp. 243–253). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Stillman, G. A. (2002). Assessing higher order mathematical thinking through applications. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Stillman, G. A. (2004). Strategies employed by upper secondary students for overcoming or exploiting conditions affecting accessibility of applications tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 41–70.
Stillman, G. A., & Galbraith, P. L. (1998). Applying mathematics with real world connections: Metacognitive characteristics of secondary students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(2), 157–195.
Stillman, G., Galbraith, P., Brown, J., & Edwards, I. (2007). A framework for success in implementing mathematical modelling in the secondary classroom. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. (Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)) (Vol. 2, pp. 688–707). Adelaide: MERGA.
Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2010). Identifying challenges within transition phases of mathematical modeling activities at Year 9. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical modeling competencies ICTMA13 (pp. 385–398). New York: Springer.
Acknowledgement
Examples used in this chapter are from research that was funded by the Australian Research Council linkage project, RITEMATHS (LP0453701), industry partner secondary schools and Texas Instruments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stillman, G. (2011). Applying Metacognitive Knowledge and Strategies in Applications and Modelling Tasks at Secondary School. In: Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R., Stillman, G. (eds) Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0909-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0910-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)